Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

BROKE CRANK AT THE RACE TRACK!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2007, 08:20 PM
  #106  
1AS
Rennlist Member
 
1AS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: dune acres, Indiana
Posts: 4,085
Received 53 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Tom,
I have never extensively tracked my Porsche, but in my road race cars I have a fair amount of experience. I tend to be conservative using the redline, as sustained revs seem to take life out of the engine. For an amateur sport, that seems like a waste. Therefore, I tend to spare the engine by upshifting about 500 rpm shy of the redline. I know I give up some speed, but Ihaven't lost a motor.
I don't know if that is reasonable in a tt where the redline seems quite low. But, I also don't think that shifting right at redline significantly improves acceleration in our cars.
Anyway, I'm posting because I would love to see you keep your enthusiasm, which will be sapped if you lunch another engine. Good luck and keep us posted!!! AS
Old 08-29-2007, 05:03 PM
  #107  
calturbo
Instructor
 
calturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin
All GT series cars AND turbo's received the updated reinforced engine case.. The engine case used in prior years was based off the 964 castiing. This casting had provisions for the oil drain tubes that ran from the cam housings to the engine case. With the addition to the water cooled liners and heads these drain tubes were omitted. BTW, Porsche had to install two large oil sump pumps on each side of the engine.

With the tubes removed, the engineers were able to provide a corrigated reinforced casting in the engine casting..
I believe the dual sumps are for acceleration and deceleration G - forces. Deceleration G forces are incurred during hard braking and can rob a sump of oil.
Old 08-29-2007, 05:12 PM
  #108  
Kevin
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 9,343
Received 339 Likes on 225 Posts
Default

That's incorrect.. Each turbo engine (and GT3)has sump pumps driven off each exhaust camshaft. With the addition of these sump pumps, there is no need to have oil drain tubes. With the drain tubes removed, Porsche reinforced the casting.
Old 08-30-2007, 10:41 AM
  #109  
tkerrmd
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tampa florida
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alexander Stemer
Tom,
I have never extensively tracked my Porsche, but in my road race cars I have a fair amount of experience. I tend to be conservative using the redline, as sustained revs seem to take life out of the engine. For an amateur sport, that seems like a waste. Therefore, I tend to spare the engine by upshifting about 500 rpm shy of the redline. I know I give up some speed, but Ihaven't lost a motor.
I don't know if that is reasonable in a tt where the redline seems quite low. But, I also don't think that shifting right at redline significantly improves acceleration in our cars.
Anyway, I'm posting because I would love to see you keep your enthusiasm, which will be sapped if you lunch another engine. Good luck and keep us posted!!! AS
Thanks AS, no loss of enthusiam by far, but I agree about the shifting and am adding a shift light as a reminder!!
Old 08-30-2007, 10:44 AM
  #110  
tkerrmd
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tampa florida
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin
All GT series cars AND turbo's received the updated reinforced engine case.. The engine case used in prior years was based off the 964 castiing. This casting had provisions for the oil drain tubes that ran from the cam housings to the engine case. With the addition to the water cooled liners and heads these drain tubes were omitted. BTW, Porsche had to install two large oil sump pumps on each side of the engine.

With the tubes removed, the engineers were able to provide a corrigated reinforced casting in the engine casting..
Kevin, you are the engine guru and this is info I sure most of us dont know!!
thanks
Old 08-30-2007, 06:17 PM
  #111  
Mikelly
Rennlist Member
 
Mikelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,625
Received 168 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Any chance we can get this made into a "sticky"?

Mike
Old 08-31-2007, 01:15 PM
  #112  
tkerrmd
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tampa florida
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mikelly
Any chance we can get this made into a "sticky"?

Mike
I think when Kevin gets the motor and analyzes it more info will come.
Again, my initial reason for the post was to let all (esp track and drag racers) know these engines can let go. Why it happens and how to PREVENT it was the primary data I was looking for. Hopefully more will come.

I have changed my track driving habits slightly since the new engine. First I avoid type 1 over revs as they may cause more damage then I had thought.
Also dont run the gas down to empty like I used to.
In the process of adding an oil temp gauge, new boost gauge, A/F gauge, and and EGT gauge. As well as a shift light.
Although this may seem like overkill, I think we may need alittle more real time monitoring of the engine when driven hard and long on the track. Some of my sessions are an hour long and previously for me that was alot of boost and redline driving. I am now somewhat more careful.
For "people" with any mods I am "told" the car is truely not dependable in track situations. I really think that affects alot of us on this forum.
Your opinions about any of the above are as always welcome
tom
Old 08-31-2007, 10:40 PM
  #113  
Boulder GT3
Racer
 
Boulder GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 490
Received 10 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tkerrmd
I have changed my track driving habits slightly since the new engine. First I avoid type 1 over revs as they may cause more damage then I had thought.
A little off topic but some relevance. When I bought my 3.8RSR motor from PMNA via Alex Jobs they had some interesting assumptions around revs and life. At 8200RPM redline and qualifying trim they ran the motor no more than 10 hours. At 7800RPM in race trim they used an engine life of 35 hours. They said if the I lowered the redline to 7400RPMs I should be good for 50-80 hours. Below 7400 it didn't run well so it was a moot point.

The tt I just bought with GIAC redlines at 7K. I short shift at 6K.
Old 09-01-2007, 12:16 AM
  #114  
DublinOh
Instructor
 
DublinOh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dublin Ohio
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Seems I read once that the stress an engine undergoes increases as the "square" of the rpms. Any engineers who can verify?
Old 09-01-2007, 08:27 AM
  #115  
993inNC
Race Car
 
993inNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wilmington NC
Posts: 4,883
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Wow Tom! I just happened onto this post..............what a bummer! Sounds like you got a lot of track miles on that motor though. The GT3's aren't rated for much more IIRC. No consolation I know, but at least it wasn't as bad a s wadding up the car
And hey, what an excellent series of "what not to do" additions to your instructor's collection
Old 09-01-2007, 08:42 AM
  #116  
Mikelly
Rennlist Member
 
Mikelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,625
Received 168 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Well, what I plan to do from here on out is to shortshift it around 6RPMs, and to change the oil before every track weekend. I'm also debating switching to something a little heavier in the oil category... Tom's loss could be our gain...

Interestingly, the only time I've ever gotten into the rev limiter was at watkins glen after the motor started losing boost due to some CEL codes that kicked it into limp mode.

Mike
Old 09-10-2007, 12:25 AM
  #117  
Jarez Mifkin
Three Wheelin'
 
Jarez Mifkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mount Juliet, TN
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bump for a great thread with awesome info...anything new to add...?
Old 09-10-2007, 11:34 PM
  #118  
tkerrmd
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tampa florida
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 993inNC
Wow Tom! I just happened onto this post..............what a bummer! Sounds like you got a lot of track miles on that motor though. The GT3's aren't rated for much more IIRC. No consolation I know, but at least it wasn't as bad a s wadding up the car
And hey, what an excellent series of "what not to do" additions to your instructor's collection
Chris, thanks for visiting our forum!! And thanks again for all your help in the past. Still didnt stop me from blowing an engine!!
The old engine is soon to be on its way to Kevin at UMW's for the long awaited autopsy.
hopefully we will learn some new info to help us in the future soon!!
Old 09-14-2007, 11:51 AM
  #119  
sundog
Race Director
 
sundog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 17,585
Received 197 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DublinOh
Seems I read once that the stress an engine undergoes increases as the "square" of the rpms. Any engineers who can verify?
The forces that the rotating parts see is squared based on the rotational velocity omega. Acceleration is omega^2 * radius, and force = mass * acceleration. Stresses are typically linear with force, but there can be material and geometric effects which make the relationship non-linear.
Old 10-17-2007, 05:10 PM
  #120  
gasman123
Intermediate
 
gasman123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any more info from the autopsy?


Quick Reply: BROKE CRANK AT THE RACE TRACK!!!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:06 PM.