Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Tracking oil temp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2016 | 02:29 PM
  #31  
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,968
Likes: 2,295
From: Cleveland Georgia
Default

The stock sensor has a +/-5% accuracy per its spec. I also have the resistance to temp curve for the sensor published by Porsche.
You believe that?
Old 10-23-2016 | 02:32 PM
  #32  
Ahsai's Avatar
Ahsai
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,328
Likes: 68
Default

Depends on what I find when I test it in hot oil

I plan to calibratfe mine during the engine rebuild.

Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
You believe that?
Old 10-23-2016 | 02:32 PM
  #33  
William Dulaney's Avatar
William Dulaney
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
Its supposed to run about the same, but it does;t on the track. Why? Because the factory great exchanger is thermally overloaded with high RPM. I see 60-80F differentials between coolant and oil temps, and ambient temps make a huge difference too. People that believe you have to keep the engine at redline to have fun are the other issue, as all that added RPM= oil temperature. This engine has 24 valve springs, engines post 2002 have dual springs on the intake that are of interference design. This alone adds huge oil temperature increases.

The factory heat exchanger is exactly that, it isn;t designed to keep oil cool, as much as it is to heat the oil up faster, due to emissions constraints. I throw it away whenever possible, and partition the coolant cooling from the oil cooling.
This all makes sense to me.

Has anyone upgraded the factory location exchanger to something that keeps oil/water within 20-30F? External air oil coolers are great, but unless I had an accusump with oil up front already, I would prefer to minimize oil lines running around the car. My car will see track time at high temps next year so I think this is something that I should be ready for.
Old 10-23-2016 | 02:36 PM
  #34  
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,968
Likes: 2,295
From: Cleveland Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by William Dulaney
This all makes sense to me.

Has anyone upgraded the factory location exchanger to something that keeps oil/water within 20-30F? External air oil coolers are great, but unless I had an accusump with oil up front already, I would prefer to minimize oil lines running around the car. My car will see track time at high temps next year so I think this is something that I should be ready for.
You won't cool 280F oil with coolant thats 220F. Its not happening... Not even with a pair of Cayenne Turbo heat exchangers. (been there, done that)

Partitioning coolant and oil cooling is the only way I've been able to control oil temperatures. With that I've had my R40 engine (4.0, 430HP) to 200F in a Cayman at Road Atlanta with track temps of 135F and ambient air temps of 97F.

IAT that day was reading 117F.
Old 10-23-2016 | 02:37 PM
  #35  
William Dulaney's Avatar
William Dulaney
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
You believe that?
I would bet that the 5% number is correct (ETA: for a new sensor)... wether or not that number is relevant based on measurement location is a different story.
Old 10-23-2016 | 02:38 PM
  #36  
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,968
Likes: 2,295
From: Cleveland Georgia
Default

I believe NOTHING that sensor tells me. Nothing.
Old 10-23-2016 | 02:45 PM
  #37  
William Dulaney's Avatar
William Dulaney
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
I believe NOTHING that sensor tells me. Nothing.
I'm certainly not arguing that the DME reported value is correct, but the VDO supplied NTC thermistor will do what it was designed to do. If I know the resistance of the loop, then I am certain that I also know the temp at the sensor, assuming it is functioning correctly / not broken.
Old 10-23-2016 | 02:49 PM
  #38  
Ahsai's Avatar
Ahsai
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,328
Likes: 68
Default

I agree because it's just an extremely simple electrical circuit. By tapping into the sensor voltage, the DME is bypassed.

Originally Posted by William Dulaney
I'm certainly not arguing that the DME reported value is correct, but the VDO supplied NTC thermistor will do what it was designed to do. If I know the resistance of the loop, then I am certain that I also know the temp at the sensor, assuming it is functioning correctly / not broken.
Old 10-23-2016 | 02:55 PM
  #39  
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,968
Likes: 2,295
From: Cleveland Georgia
Default

Ok, you fellas can go down your own paths...

Install 8 stand alone sensors in the sump (all over) with an 8 position switch feeding he same stand alone instrument...Flip between those and compare to the factory sensor.
Old 10-23-2016 | 03:04 PM
  #40  
Slakker's Avatar
Slakker
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,775
Likes: 270
From: Edmond, OK
Default

Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
Ok, you fellas can go down your own paths...

Install 8 stand alone sensors in the sump (all over) with an 8 position switch feeding he same stand alone instrument...Flip between those and compare to the factory sensor.
What's the best way/location to install a sensor in the sump?
Old 10-23-2016 | 03:07 PM
  #41  
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,968
Likes: 2,295
From: Cleveland Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by Slakker
What's the best way/location to install a sensor in the sump?
Weld a bung onto the sump plate to be tapped for 1/8 NPT, or whatever the diameter is of the sending unit that will be used.
Old 10-23-2016 | 03:24 PM
  #42  
Ahsai's Avatar
Ahsai
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,328
Likes: 68
Default

I think we are mixing 3 things here:
​​​1) the inherent error of the sensor (or any sensor)
2) the location of the sensor whether it's the best location to measure and reflect the oil temp
3) DME substituting the reported value

Each will need to be discussed, understood, and addressed individually.

Originally Posted by Flat6 Innovations
Ok, you fellas can go down your own paths...

Install 8 stand alone sensors in the sump (all over) with an 8 position switch feeding he same stand alone instrument...Flip between those and compare to the factory sensor.
Old 10-24-2016 | 01:47 AM
  #43  
Ahsai's Avatar
Ahsai
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,328
Likes: 68
Default

Re 1) from the Porsche oil temp sensor tolerance curve, at the range of interest (100C to 150C), the error is about +/- 5 degrees C (or +/- 10 degrees F).

Re 2), one potential issue with the stock oil sensor is it sits ~1" above the oil sump bottom, on the right side (bank 2) of the engine and OUTSIDE the plastic oil baffle of the sump. So it's perceivable with extreme g-force (e.g., hard and long right turns), it could be starved of engine oil. If that happens, I think we should see pretty sharp oil temp drop (crankcase air temp) though. This may also explain what Jake saw.

Last edited by Ahsai; 10-24-2016 at 02:10 AM.
Old 07-31-2017 | 10:07 PM
  #44  
daylorb's Avatar
daylorb
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 893
Likes: 81
From: Austin, TX
Default

I realize this is an old thread - but from everything I was able to find, the oil temp can be accessed if the PID code can be determined - as long as the ODB software allows for custom PIDs. ODBLINK Mx wifi does allow for this - now the question is how to determine what the PID code is for temp.

Any thoughts?
Old 08-04-2017 | 03:02 AM
  #45  
afx's Avatar
afx
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by daylorb
I realize this is an old thread - but from everything I was able to find, the oil temp can be accessed if the PID code can be determined - as long as the ODB software allows for custom PIDs. ODBLINK Mx wifi does allow for this - now the question is how to determine what the PID code is for temp.

Any thoughts?
From reading other threads on oil temp, it has been mentioned that the oil temp value from OBD2 is potentially a calculated value vs an actual value from CAN. Would probably need to read both and verify if they are producing the same values.

As far as adding in PIDs, seems like that would be necessary, but I have no clue how you would figure out the PIDs you need.



Quick Reply: Tracking oil temp



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:00 AM.