Narrow body vs. Wide body width
#16
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And I love it
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#17
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think the way the shoulders come into the c pillar makes the WB fairly striking. But I still like the sleeker more understated NB for the 996. 964 WB is about as good as it gets for me though. Different strokes...
#18
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#19
Track Day
#20
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We need a “what makes a C4S so special anyway” post. 😀
Last edited by Argeo; 12-10-2021 at 01:22 PM.
#21
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think most of what makes the C4S special is quite obvious (last real “Turbolook M491” legacy). But there are internal uniqueness that aren’t visible, nor widely known; like the additional engine cooling, etc. I agree it’s unique enough to warrant a “following”
#22
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think they both look great. However, I do prefer a narrow body with wheels as wide as possible. Just looks more agile to me. But make no bones about it, the C4S is a beautiful car. Anyone would be lucky to have a NB or WB.
The following users liked this post:
Argeo (12-10-2021)