Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Narrow body vs. Wide body width

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2014, 12:48 PM
  #1  
Snowball350
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Snowball350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Narrow body vs. Wide body width

With an after market rear turbo style bumper, is the difference negligible? Not talking performance, solely aesthetics. See pic.
Attached Images  
Old 09-05-2014, 12:56 PM
  #2  
Snowball350
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Snowball350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Another angle
Attached Images  
Old 09-05-2014, 02:08 PM
  #3  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,438
Received 1,451 Likes on 905 Posts
Default

The C4S is about 2.4 inches wider than the C2 at the rear fender flare. The visual appeal makes that appear much greater in person. Of course, there is much more than just a wider rear end to the C4S. It's a very striking car. Everything about it the design seems to flow very well.
Old 09-05-2014, 02:41 PM
  #4  
alpine003
Banned
 
alpine003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Does this post in anyway convey a level of insecurity on the OP's part?
Old 09-05-2014, 02:59 PM
  #5  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,438
Received 1,451 Likes on 905 Posts
Default

You can really see how much lower the C4S sits in that photo (assuming stock suspension in each car).
Old 09-05-2014, 03:09 PM
  #6  
kromdom
Drifting
 
kromdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,242
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alpine003
Does this post in anyway convey a level of insecurity on the OP's part?


OP, can you tell the difference? Does it matter to you?

P.S. 2.4 inches IMHO is "neglible" (I have a C2 and it is already a FAT BUTT enough for me) but I will gladly take 2.4 inches LONGER in a specific part of my anatomy anyday...but then I digress
Old 09-05-2014, 06:05 PM
  #7  
996_North
Drifting
 
996_North's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cambridge, ON
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I am really surprised that no one ever did an aftermarket retrofit of the rear deck reflector. That is what makes the 996 C4S appear wider. Blasphemy perhaps, but I think people would buy it. The 996 C4S is still my fav looking Porsche.
The following users liked this post:
Darkboyz68 (01-12-2022)
Old 09-05-2014, 07:00 PM
  #8  
Snowball350
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
Snowball350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I wouldn't call it insecurity, because I love my 996. But, do I wish I had bought a C4S or a turbo? You betcha. So maybe a little wide body envy!
Old 09-05-2014, 08:28 PM
  #9  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,438
Received 1,451 Likes on 905 Posts
Default

A C4S decklid retrofit is possible for a C2, but it's a major PITA. It requires significant trimming of the decklid for width and length along with appropriate priming and painting. Even then, the reflector won't properly line up with the narrow body tail lights. Not worth the cost and effort...
Old 09-05-2014, 09:35 PM
  #10  
alpine003
Banned
 
alpine003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,697
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Snowball350
I wouldn't call it insecurity, because I love my 996. But, do I wish I had bought a C4S or a turbo? You betcha. So maybe a little wide body envy!
Kudos to your honesty and clarification.
Old 09-05-2014, 09:43 PM
  #11  
996_North
Drifting
 
996_North's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cambridge, ON
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dennis C
A C4S decklid retrofit is possible for a C2, but it's a major PITA. It requires significant trimming of the decklid for width and length along with appropriate priming and painting. Even then, the reflector won't properly line up with the narrow body tail lights. Not worth the cost and effort...
The mod would be on the C2 decklid to align with the lights, or a fibreglass one...not the C4S decklid. Still not worth the cost and effort, but that doesn't always matter. . Maybe slap on some tape...
Attached Images  
Old 09-05-2014, 09:57 PM
  #12  
Gonzo911
Rat Balls
Rennlist Member
 
Gonzo911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Scottsdale AZ, USA
Posts: 3,636
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Extenze?
Old 09-06-2014, 01:02 AM
  #13  
vu.q.le
Instructor
 
vu.q.le's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 224
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

There is something wrong about the C4S rear light that extend from one side to the other. Ugly
Old 09-06-2014, 03:07 AM
  #14  
Dennis C
Rocky Mountain High
Rennlist Member
 
Dennis C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 17,438
Received 1,451 Likes on 905 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vu.q.le
There is something wrong about the C4S rear light that extend from one side to the other. Ugly
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, as they say. Many, many people would disagree with you. However, if you're one of the people who doesn't like it, then don't buy one! Everything works out in the end...
Old 09-06-2014, 03:25 AM
  #15  
vu.q.le
Instructor
 
vu.q.le's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 224
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I don't know why you're so offended. It's just my opinion. My opinion doesn't mean much.


Quick Reply: Narrow body vs. Wide body width



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:50 PM.