Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Miles per tank?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2013 | 02:19 PM
  #31  
ditto's Avatar
ditto
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 424
Likes: 2
From: Mass
Default

Originally Posted by 996Ray
Guys,

I know it is high performance. I know it is going to burn gas.....I only ask the question because I am getting so far below what Porsche says I should get in town....I just want to know if something is wrong with my car. I don't want be bathing the cylinder walls in unburned fuel.

If everyone else was getting 14-16 miles per gallon in town.....I would just accept the fact that Porsche, like most manufacturers, publishes numbers better than reality.

Ray
Your mileage is normal. If you milk the cruise control your mileage can get better but your life would be duller.
Old 10-07-2013 | 05:24 PM
  #32  
white out's Avatar
white out
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 5
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by sjfehr
You paid a lot of money for a high performance sports car, presumably because of the high performance part; that performance is worthless if you don't take advantage of it. If mpg is your priority, you bought the wrong car.

If you're getting more than 20mpg out of your 996, you're driving it all wrong.
My Viper ACR would constantly net mileage around 27mpg on the highway and peaked at 30mpg. I know it's mostly gearing for that kind of mileage, but the 3.4-3.6 should come close for mundane driving.

A non-GT2/3/turbo 996 is not a high performance sports car. It's a good GT car, not a pure track-rat. So MPG matters.

Originally Posted by mcbit
I also own a Cayenne turbo, so there's nothing a 996 can do to me fuel-wise to hurt my pocket any more!
LOL!

In general, people who own and drive their cars frequently do care about mpg. When I first picked up my Murci and found out that it would get 10mpg highway, I was irritated because my Viper would net nearly triple the mpg, and even my H1 would get better mpg (sold both for Lambo). It didn't stop me from putting a ton of miles on the car, but I did notice the fuel bills and I would find myself driving the 996 on long drives over the Lambo.
Old 10-07-2013 | 11:02 PM
  #33  
AA717driver's Avatar
AA717driver
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 39
From: Naples, FL/Sapphire, NC
Default

Originally Posted by white out

A non-GT2/3/turbo 996 is not a high performance sports car. It's a good GT car, not a pure track-rat. So MPG.
Guess I have low standards.

TC
Old 10-08-2013 | 02:41 AM
  #34  
V996's Avatar
V996
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: Brockville, ON
Default

Originally Posted by sjfehr
You paid a lot of money for a high performance sports car, presumably because of the high performance part; that performance is worthless if you don't take advantage of it. If mpg is your priority, you bought the wrong car.

If you're getting more than 20mpg out of your 996, you're driving it all wrong.
At what point do you start caring? 10 mpg? 5 mpg? Fact is it does matter.

We're not saying mpg is priority, we're saying it is a factor. A car that gets great performance out of less fuel is to be acknowledged. I'm sure most people who take their cars on longer races would agree too.

We're just wondering what the car is capable of. It's pretty impressive if it can almost match an economy car (from the same model years) even if you are babying it.
Old 10-08-2013 | 02:46 AM
  #35  
mcbit's Avatar
mcbit
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 7
From: Abu Dhabi, UAE
Default

Originally Posted by V996
At what point do you start caring? 10 mpg? 5 mpg? Fact is it does matter.

We're not saying mpg is priority, we're saying it is a factor. A car that gets great performance out of less fuel is to be acknowledged. I'm sure most people who take their cars on longer races would agree too.

We're just wondering what the car is capable of. It's pretty impressive if it can almost match an economy car (from the same model years) even if you are babying it.
But presumably you buy a vehicle with the knowledge that it will perform within a certain range of values and only if there is a significant change in the norm is there something to be concerned about.
Old 10-10-2013 | 02:03 AM
  #36  
whatnot's Avatar
whatnot
Track Day
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

I have had my 996 for about 15k miles and it has never once gone under 20mpg no matter how I drive it. The best I ever got was just under 27 mpg.

It is really rare to see the low fuel light come on with less than 300 miles on the tank.
I usually look for gas without ethanol in it. Not sure if that makes a big difference or not.
Old 10-10-2013 | 05:14 PM
  #37  
DrBrain's Avatar
DrBrain
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Carlsbad, CA
Default

I get around 16 mpg, 10 miles highway, ca. 4 miles city streets with traffic lights. Never gone over 17 mpg. Tank lasts ca. 240-250 miles. 2004 C2.
Old 10-10-2013 | 11:32 PM
  #38  
Throttle's Avatar
Throttle
Advanced
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica, CA
Default

Agree with sjfehr! The vast majority of my driving is in town. I have a Tip and drive it 100% in manual mode. I average about 13.5 mpg.

If I was concerned about mileage and my kids were old enough to sit in the front, I'd sell the 996 and buy the new Corvette which gets 29 mpg on the highway in econ mode. ;-)
Old 10-11-2013 | 12:25 AM
  #39  
996Ray's Avatar
996Ray
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 144
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk, VA
Default

Dr. Brain,
That is exactly what I am experiencing. Sounds like mileage varies greatly between all of us.

Thanks,
Ray
Old 10-11-2013 | 11:43 PM
  #40  
fmmoto's Avatar
fmmoto
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Northeast
Default

Originally Posted by ditto
Your mileage is normal. If you milk the cruise control your mileage can get better but your life would be duller.
.......wait a minute......there's cruise control on these cars???
Old 10-12-2013 | 12:30 AM
  #41  
AA717driver's Avatar
AA717driver
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 39
From: Naples, FL/Sapphire, NC
Default

Not that I care but my last tank was roughly 18 mpg with the 50/50 mix of interstate and stoplight-intensive city streets. Mostly no shifting below 3000 rpm's and several forays above 5000 during each drive.

TC



Quick Reply: Miles per tank?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:12 AM.