Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

The IMS discussion thread (Read this first!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2018, 09:22 PM
  #391  
AA717driver
Rennlist Member
 
AA717driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Naples, FL/Sapphire, NC
Posts: 1,154
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vincent713
So there is a stand alone oil feed you can install and leave the existing original IMS bearing intact?
Yes. Saw an install vid the other day.

Not touching it. I’ll do the solution if my car qualifies at 100k mi....

TC
Old 12-07-2018, 09:27 PM
  #392  
Vincent713
Three Wheelin'
 
Vincent713's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1,453
Received 162 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AA717driver


Yes. Saw an install vid the other day.

Not touching it. I’ll do the solution if my car qualifies at 100k mi....

TC
Do you happen to have the link to this video? This is big news to me and I like to get more info on it. TIA.
Old 12-08-2018, 10:19 AM
  #393  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,054
Received 805 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vincent713
Do you happen to have the link to this video? This is big news to me and I like to get more info on it. TIA.
A simple Google search will get you there.
Old 12-08-2018, 10:33 AM
  #394  
jdoc1949
Rennlist Member
 
jdoc1949's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Covington,KY
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

BRAND NEW IMS KIT FOR SALE
I have a 2003 Targa with 74,000 miles, decided to drop engine and do bearing and seal swap before any issues.
Pulled it apart and found out that bearing was different.
Upon Inspection found out I had a new engine fitted in 2010 under warrantee at 49,000 miles by Porsche. Its the newer engine so IMS is not an issue.
I had talked to the dealer before and asked why they did not tell me, there explanation was they only keep records for 2 yrs, go figure?.
NEW KIT FOR SALE
So I have a LN kit and a new oem seal , I paid $547 for all as I had a coupon, the LN kits are now $650 plus seal $48 ( $698) value
I will seal all for $490 to member. I have photos and receipt, brand new, along with registration card for kit, I can send photos.
John

Last edited by jdoc1949; 12-08-2018 at 10:41 AM. Reason: spellin
Old 12-22-2018, 08:02 PM
  #395  
Sapientoni
Advanced
 
Sapientoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 87
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My money says many people who buy a Porsche rarely check their oil level. I'd bet when it starts making a noise is when they add oil. Porsche tested these engines for millions of miles but they checked the oil when they added fuel. These "fixes" are probably necessary for anybody too busy to comply with factory users manuals. If this 29000 mile car is "good" when acquired, just check the oil regularly and inspect it when another service makes it convenient. Clutch, etc.



Old 12-23-2018, 11:01 PM
  #396  
AA717driver
Rennlist Member
 
AA717driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Naples, FL/Sapphire, NC
Posts: 1,154
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Vincent, I’ll look for the link. It was in one of the threads in this section.

TC
Old 02-23-2019, 09:58 PM
  #397  
amargari
Rennlist Member
 
amargari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Morristown, NJ
Posts: 479
Received 400 Likes on 154 Posts
Default

I have been reading a lot about the IMS and watched the videos online. One of the contributing factors is low RPM load on the engine. In all the statistics was there ever a breakdown between Tip cars and Manual cars? I was wondering if the Tip does a better job of keeping the load off of the bearing.
Old 02-25-2019, 12:41 PM
  #398  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,450
Received 1,071 Likes on 557 Posts
Default

In the grand scheme of things, it really doesn't matter. Less Tip cars were made, so we see less failures. In all actuality, it boils down to how it's driven. In the city, a Tip will gravitate to top gear, with the engine running at lower rpms on average than a manual car. At higher speeds, the final drive on a Tip has the engine rpm being higher than a similar manual car. It's all in how it's driven.
Old 02-25-2019, 01:43 PM
  #399  
911Syncro
Pro
 
911Syncro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Pasqual Valley, CA
Posts: 513
Received 220 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Charles, this is one subject I've been wondering about and would appreciate any additional explanation. Is there a way to understand the mechanism which is happening with higher RPMs? I know this is common advice, that higher RPMs help prevent the IMSB from failing. But what is really happening in this circumstance? Is there more oil splashed on the bearing? Does the oil stay fresher at higher RPMs? Do higher RPMs relate somehow to the oil contaminants? Or in the circumstance of the IMSB seals failing, and the "lifetime" grease coming out, do higher RPMs help to drive that old grease out so oil can get at the bearing? Is there some relationship between higher RPMs and the way the ***** in the bearing behave? Sorry for all the poor guesses, it is only to illustrate the further insight I'd be interested to understand. Thank you!
Old 02-25-2019, 01:50 PM
  #400  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,450
Received 1,071 Likes on 557 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911Syncro
Charles, this is one subject I've been wondering about and would appreciate any additional explanation. Is there a way to understand the mechanism which is happening with higher RPMs? I know this is common advice, that higher RPMs help prevent the IMSB from failing. But what is really happening in this circumstance? Is there more oil splashed on the bearing? Does the oil stay fresher at higher RPMs? Do higher RPMs relate somehow to the oil contaminants? Or in the circumstance of the IMSB seals failing, and the "lifetime" grease coming out, do higher RPMs help to drive that old grease out so oil can get at the bearing? Is there some relationship between higher RPMs and the way the ***** in the bearing behave? Sorry for all the poor guesses, it is only to illustrate the further insight I'd be interested to understand. Thank you!
It has to do with hydrodynamic lubrication. At higher surface speeds, less oil is required to properly lubricate the bearing. Think about it this way - there is a fixed load on the bearing. At higher speeds, the ball spends less time at a given point as the ball is rolling (or sliding) faster. This is obviously an oversimplification, but it gets the point across. Porsche realized this and went to the 6305 bearing to increase the surface speed, which as a byproduct, also restored the load capacity the original dual row bearing had.
Old 02-25-2019, 02:06 PM
  #401  
amargari
Rennlist Member
 
amargari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Morristown, NJ
Posts: 479
Received 400 Likes on 154 Posts
Default

So spinning the bearing faster reduces the amount of load on a given surface at a given time. I find it funny that the 70s GM Super T10 transmission I rebuilt had a roller bearing that survived for over 100K miles without issue but Porsche was having an 8% failure rate at half that mileage. Granted, the T10 doesn't have a side load on it and that may be part of the issue. Also, the roller bearing in the T10 wasn't sealed and relied on splashing from the gear oil in the transmission.
Old 02-25-2019, 02:09 PM
  #402  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,450
Received 1,071 Likes on 557 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by amargari
So spinning the bearing faster reduces the amount of load on a given surface at a given time. I find it funny that the 70s GM Super T10 transmission I rebuilt had a roller bearing that survived for over 100K miles without issue but Porsche was having an 8% failure rate at half that mileage. Granted, the T10 doesn't have a side load on it and that may be part of the issue. Also, the roller bearing in the T10 wasn't sealed and relied on splashing from the gear oil in the transmission.
Yup. As I've said many times, if Porsche had just keep the dual row bearing and left the seals off, I don't believe we'd all be having this discussion now.
Old 02-25-2019, 02:13 PM
  #403  
AdamIsAdam
Rennlist Member
 
AdamIsAdam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,804
Received 3,823 Likes on 1,643 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles Navarro
It has to do with hydrodynamic lubrication. At higher surface speeds, less oil is required to properly lubricate the bearing. Think about it this way - there is a fixed load on the bearing. At higher speeds, the ball spends less time at a given point as the ball is rolling (or sliding) faster. This is obviously an oversimplification, but it gets the point across. Porsche realized this and went to the 6305 bearing to increase the surface speed, which as a byproduct, also restored the load capacity the original dual row bearing had.
I've wondered about this over and over again this after watching Jake in the PCA video. I thought maybe it had to do with centrifugal forces. But you're saying the load is fixed, and at higher speeds the lubrication needs are reduced reduced because of hydrodynamic lubrication. Based on this link, it appears that at higher speeds, the ball bearings basically hydroplane. Interesting!
Old 02-25-2019, 03:29 PM
  #404  
DBJoe996
Rennlist Member
 
DBJoe996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 5,814
Likes: 0
Received 1,093 Likes on 703 Posts
Default

New term for 2019 - hydroplane your IMSB! Love it....
Old 02-25-2019, 05:41 PM
  #405  
AnthonyGS
Rennlist Member
 
AnthonyGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: near Jackson, MS
Posts: 1,021
Received 144 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Charles Navarro
Yup. As I've said many times, if Porsche had just keep the dual row bearing and left the seals off, I don't believe we'd all be having this discussion now.
It definitely would’ve given the equipment a fighting chance. I still don’t get why a cylindrical roller bearing wasn’t employed or even a timken style with an angle for thrust loads too. I’m not sure they can handle the rpm, but materials might make that possible.

It’s a lot to ask of a simple ball roller bearing no matter how you view this issue.


Quick Reply: The IMS discussion thread (Read this first!)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:31 PM.