Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Sumitomo HTR Z III question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2008, 01:23 AM
  #31  
Meister Fahrer
Three Wheelin'
 
Meister Fahrer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not to confuse the subject of III's, but I still like the II's, got new rears about a month ago.

fwiw, I just did an auto-x with them and they were great at about 35 psi rear. I was sliding the car in some sections but the rear felt planted and actually confidence-inspring...
Old 07-31-2008, 08:54 AM
  #32  
TCR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TCR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SW Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Size

Originally Posted by TMAC
What size did you put on the rear?
265/35ZR-18 Sumitomo HTR Z III XL
Old 07-31-2008, 09:28 AM
  #33  
chsu74
Rennlist Member
 
chsu74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 9,615
Received 311 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

I am running 235s up front and 295s in the rears for about 1K miles now. This is coming from 245s in the front and 285s in the rear Conti2s. I noticed more understeer due to the narrower front rubber. I notice more grip overall but have to agree with the softer sidewall which translates into quiter ride.

As a DD, its the best bang for the buck. You may notice the tread pattern matching Dunlop tire magazine advertisement treads. I will not hesitate to buy again.
Old 07-31-2008, 09:29 AM
  #34  
Tippy
Race Car
 
Tippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,978
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I know a guy at work who has them on his Mustang. He put 305's on the rear and said he can roast them on demand.

Speaks a lot because a Mustang is a gutless car IMO. He claims they are pretty slippery but they do have a really nice tread pattern.

He bought them about 6 months ago but I don't know if it is a II or III.
Old 07-31-2008, 11:30 AM
  #35  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I have these tires. They are very good when in dry conditions. In the wet you will be slipping and sliding all over the place. They may perform better in the wet on a rear engine car but they really have trouble holding the road on my front engine car.
Old 07-31-2008, 11:41 AM
  #36  
Doug Donsbach
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Doug Donsbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fabio421
I have these tires. They are very good when in dry conditions. In the wet you will be slipping and sliding all over the place. They may perform better in the wet on a rear engine car but they really have trouble holding the road on my front engine car.
I've driven mine quite a bit in the wet, both in light rain in the twisties and in torrential downpours on the interstate. While I wouldn't confuse them with a high-quality all-season tire in the wet, they stick well enough that I can't knock them too much. Hydroplaning resistance is also better than I expected.

I'm running 225s front and 295s rear on 8s and 11s.
Old 07-31-2008, 11:54 AM
  #37  
caribbeantech
Intermediate
 
caribbeantech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Miami, FL 33189
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Currently I have just shy of 10,000 miles on my rear set. I'm definitely going to buy them again. The set that came with the car (Bridgestones OEM with about 75% left) only lasted 5,000 miles and they went to the cords and to a dangerously wobbly ride. These (HTRZ III's) have held up to the same type of driving (lots of spirited turns on back roads, to and from work - very de-stressing...) for at least twice as long, so they've already exceeded to my expectations. I had to 'rotate' them (change sides, really) at about 1/2 way since the driver's side (rear) one tends to wear at about 1.5 times faster (likely from the more aggressive turns, on that side (sliding left turns they call it...) ALL GOOD STUFF!! It was nice that I could do that with these tires...(not rotationally challenged)

A couple of things though...I don't really go fast, unless it's a straightaway, I prefer challenging the turns...

I don't Mod (stock everything, if they didn't put it in, I don't want it...), track, rally, drift or otherwise compete with my car...So, no feedback on that...

I never do anything in the rain...so I have no feedback other than driving at the speed limit, or less...

And, my *** is not really calibrated to feel the nuances of the sidewall softness/hardness...I just have a lot of fun with it (twice a day, when sunny) so...the 911 IS the best handling car I've ever owned, and that's good enough for me.....I'm sure there's better tires out there...for my money (and fun) I'm buying again...

Last thing, I had the II's on a BMW 328 and absolutely hated them...tramlining, loud..etc...
However, I took a chance on the III's and feel like I've discovered something good (to me)...

I calculate I have about 2,000 miles left on these, but I must also say that the inner thread (which looks like it's specially made for the type of cars that wear the insides...'cambery' cars), has held up pretty nicely...

(other opinions may vary...)
Old 02-13-2009, 10:03 PM
  #38  
maniac
Intermediate
 
maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool

Originally Posted by himself
I have the III's on my car now - for about 5,000 miles. No problems in the dry, or semi-wet. Eh, we don't get much rain here in Texas. No winter condition driving. I use these as my DD tires, and not track use. The III's are low noise, nice profile, and great tread design. I can recommend them for DD, but I have not used them on the track at all.

For the track, I use(d) Yokohama AVS ES100. These have lasted me an entire year on the track (14 days) - and they are only worn by 1/2. Granted, they are not the stickiest tires, but for a cheap tweener tire that gets long life, these are sweet. These were great tires to get to know the car, as they talk alot and break free gradually. Plus, discount tire had them in stock.

However, with my new Christmas rims, I'm putting RA-1s all the way around. So my 17" with ES100's are soon out the door.

Keep in mind that you will be sacrificing something as you compromise for longer tread life. If you are not hardcore into DE/Track time, then the ES100 are a decent tire to get your through a season. If you are a junkie, well, you're going to have to suck it up and get better tires.

-td
Hi Himself,

I trust your recommendations, but I see that the Yokohama AVS ES100 doesn't come in 285/30-18 for my rear tires. My Michelin Pilot sport tires handled very good, but really didn't last in my first DE.
Which one do you recommend for a daily driver an for occasional DE track driving, maybe the SUMITOMO HTR Z lll or the General Exclaim UHP. I'm looking for a tire that will last longer, have strong good handling and the last important factor good price.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3 also looks great, but is 285/35-18, not the same size.
Old 02-14-2009, 12:52 AM
  #39  
himself
Rennlist Member
 
himself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,736
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by maniac
Hi Himself,

I trust your recommendations, but I see that the Yokohama AVS ES100 doesn't come in 285/30-18 for my rear tires. My Michelin Pilot sport tires handled very good, but really didn't last in my first DE.
Which one do you recommend for a daily driver an for occasional DE track driving, maybe the SUMITOMO HTR Z lll or the General Exclaim UHP. I'm looking for a tire that will last longer, have strong good handling and the last important factor good price.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3 also looks great, but is 285/35-18, not the same size.
Unfortunately, there is no great compromise for track/street with price also as a consideration. If you want something that lasts, you're going to need high treadwear. This means long life but poor(er) grip. If you get something with more grip, that means it has softer rubber and shorter life. For a beginner/novice, I would guestimate that around 200 treadwear is a good middle ground. Pilot Sport and Sport 2 are both 220 treadwear. As are the HTRZ IIs. The HTRZs are 300. The Yokohamas are 280, but they actually out perform the HTRZ IIs (as per Tire Rack).

In my experience, the Yokos were a nice compromise in the 17 variety. I have not tried my Sumitomos on the track yet, but if you are going to - I would suggest the IIs instead of the IIIs. I believe the IIIs asymetrical tires. This means that you won't be able to flip the tires and get extra life out of them. [inner part of tire must always be inner, even if you change sides]. The IIs are directional only, so you can flip them.

One other tire you should research is the falken azenis 615. Check with JC3D here on Rennlist. He's used them and now is now racing. He probably has some thoughts. Also check with Dell (LVDell) and Andy (AudiOn19s).

Once you get past the first two run groups though, you should probably have a better performing tire to further develop your skills and understanding of car dynamics at the llimit. A decent R-compound tire will probably work (Toyo R888 or RA1, Nitto NT-01, Pilot Sport Cup, BF Goodrich R1, Hoosier R6, Hankook Z214, etc.) And if I knew then what I know now: I would have bought an extra set of rims and gotten my tires as take off slicks from Bob Chick or John Berget. 50-100 bucks a piece for racing tires. And if you get the endurance compounds, they last a long time...

-td

Last edited by himself; 02-14-2009 at 09:21 PM.
Old 02-14-2009, 09:26 AM
  #40  
maniac
Intermediate
 
maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks Himself for sharing your experience!
Old 02-14-2009, 11:15 AM
  #41  
Dutchie in NC
Burning Brakes
 
Dutchie in NC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO (left NC)
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Eurowerks in CLT is putting HTR Z III 's on my car as we speak... will report back next week when I get the car back. Bought the tires at TireRack for $600 (18 inch)
Old 02-14-2009, 08:57 PM
  #42  
pissedpuppy
Nordschleife Master
 
pissedpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 5,260
Received 490 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

just ordered the IIs myslef (yesterday)
Old 02-15-2009, 01:21 PM
  #43  
bernocco930S
Racer
 
bernocco930S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have years of championship sports car racing (not DE stuff) experience with two championships and I understand tires. I thought they looked good on paper also but when I put them on my C4S with X73 the felt like they were riding on marbles. NO grip, hard to balance, overall bad rating from me. I sold them on eBay after only 150 miles of use (street) I am now using Hankooks on the street. I think these are good tires! eric
Old 02-15-2009, 03:03 PM
  #44  
Dutchie in NC
Burning Brakes
 
Dutchie in NC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Denver, CO (left NC)
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, I just picked my car up and have a whopping 10 miles on these tires and first impression is that they are less noisy and not as hard of a ride as my Pirello P zero's. So far, I am a happy customer
Old 02-15-2009, 03:33 PM
  #45  
gota911
Newbies Hospitality Director
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
gota911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 18,085
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Pirellis get VERY loud after they ger worn down.


Quick Reply: Sumitomo HTR Z III question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:41 AM.