Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Sumitomo HTR Z III question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2008, 05:11 PM
  #16  
BillJ
Burning Brakes
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 868
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I was really unimpressed with the HTRZ II's when I had them on the 993, especially when doing easy laps (7/10's maybe) at a local track in August. They went to mush in 3 laps. Daily they were okay but had minimal confidence on pushing it in any way and found them as Damon described "skittish". Like anything that evolves maybe they have gotten better!!
Old 01-03-2008, 02:21 AM
  #17  
blinkwatt
Pro
 
blinkwatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by damon@tirerack.com
Being a subsidiary of Dunlop means they share much of the rubber compounding technology shared by many of Dunlops more advanced tires. I sell HTR Z II's to many performance car owners and overall it rates to be a very good tire, especially for the money. I don't recommend them much to Porsche owners because many report them to wear pretty quickly and be skittish. I'm hoping that the new tread design of the HTRZIII proves to be better. Time will tell.
How long have the HRT Z III been for sale? I notice there isn't any customer feedback on the tires to date.
Old 01-06-2008, 03:31 PM
  #18  
4flynlow
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
4flynlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vista,California
Posts: 165
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Damon:
As the resident expert what do you recomend for a high performance street tire for the 993 TT ?
Old 05-30-2008, 03:52 PM
  #19  
UCrazyKid
Pro
 
UCrazyKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bump.
Anymore feedback on these tires?
Old 05-30-2008, 03:58 PM
  #20  
BillJ
Burning Brakes
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 868
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I still think they suck
Old 05-30-2008, 04:02 PM
  #21  
Doug Donsbach
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Doug Donsbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UCrazyKid
Bump.
Anymore feedback on these tires?
2,750 miles (street only) and no complaints. I'd buy them again.

And to clarify, these are the IIIs we're discussing here, not the older IIs, right?

Last edited by Doug Donsbach; 05-30-2008 at 05:11 PM. Reason: IIIs vs IIs
Old 05-30-2008, 04:35 PM
  #22  
Patrick E
Rennlist Member
 
Patrick E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 994
Received 57 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BillJ
I still think they suck
Old 05-30-2008, 05:16 PM
  #23  
UCrazyKid
Pro
 
UCrazyKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug Donsbach
And to clarify, these are the IIIs we're discussing here, not the older IIs, right?
YES III's
Old 05-30-2008, 05:17 PM
  #24  
UCrazyKid
Pro
 
UCrazyKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BillJ
I still think they suck
Can you please elaborate. On what data do you base this? Have you had these tires on your vehicle?
Please address the III's not the II's.

Thanks
Old 05-30-2008, 05:53 PM
  #25  
BillJ
Burning Brakes
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 868
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I have no experience with the III - just the II's which really stunk. Looking on tirerack they have radically changed the tread pattern and moved the wear rating from 220 up to 300. They also reduced weight which hopefully does not translate into more sidewall flex. sorry for not having direct experience with that version as they may be better than the old ones (not hard to do IMHO). That said i would go with at least a kumho brand over summitomo if you are looking at the lower range rubber.
Old 05-30-2008, 07:48 PM
  #26  
MechanicalEng
Burning Brakes
 
MechanicalEng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 790
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Like I said in my past tread I got them (HRT Z III) and so far they have been great.. I used them for my first 4 AutoX events and I came 1st in my class in 1 event, 2nd in the other 2, and 3rd in the last event... Tomorrow I am participating in another event.. one of my events was in the wet and the tires behaved perfectly.. I am not saying that they are the best tires out there but for the price there is no better value..

Last edited by MechanicalEng; 01-04-2010 at 03:04 PM.
Old 06-03-2008, 11:48 PM
  #27  
rroobbcc
Racer
 
rroobbcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have about 1000 miles on mine. Overall I prefer them to the Pirelli P-Zero System I had previously. They are quieter and should last for quite a few more miles. Grip is at least on par with the Pirelli as well.

I had 225s on the front, which I upped to 235s when I put on the Sumitomos. This corrected to two complaints I had with the previous tires, namely early lockup under braking and understeer. The car is far better balanced now. I realize that I may have experienced this same result with 235s from other brands as well, so this is not necessarily a direct praise of the Sumitomos.

On the downside, the softer sidewalls take away some steering responsiveness. However, I am not sure to which degree this should be attributed to the Sumitomos, and how much is due to the 235 tires on 8" wheels (the low limit for a 235). It would have been interesting to try a 225 tire up front, as I would have been able to make a direct comparison. Regardless, I am still very happy with the Sumitomos compared to the Pirellis. Considering the price and the expected longer life, they certainly offer great value for a daily driver.
Old 07-30-2008, 10:59 PM
  #28  
TCR
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
TCR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SW Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just had the III's installed today. They are 18's on a 2001 C4.
So far, so good! I only have 9 miles on them and this car is a daily driver in Chicago traffic.
Old 07-30-2008, 11:08 PM
  #29  
Doug Donsbach
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Doug Donsbach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Still very pleased with mine with about 4,000 miles on them.
Old 07-31-2008, 12:45 AM
  #30  
TMAC
Instructor
 
TMAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TCR
I just had the III's installed today. They are 18's on a 2001 C4.
So far, so good! I only have 9 miles on them and this car is a daily driver in Chicago traffic.
What size did you put on the rear?


Quick Reply: Sumitomo HTR Z III question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:27 PM.