Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

2001 C4 vs C2 Price Difference

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2021 | 03:39 PM
  #16  
plpete84's Avatar
plpete84
Drifting
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 2,360
Likes: 2,254
From: Washington DC
Default

I actually wouldn't mind a cab but what kills is for me is the aesthetics of the rear window. Coupe just looks much better IMHO. Having said that, I thought the original GT3 actually used the C4 chassis in RWD config because it was more rigid. I think this is why some folks remove the front diff and axles if they are building a track toy.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2021 | 04:13 PM
  #17  
peterp's Avatar
peterp
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 954
From: NJ/NY area
Default

Originally Posted by Optionman1
IHas anyone driven a cab with the hardtop on who can compare it to a coupe? Just curious how they differ in feel.
I haven't driven a cab, so can't provide any feedback on driving feel versus a coupe, but the weight difference is 174 lbs additional for the cab on a C2 (and 165 lbs additional on a C4).
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2021 | 04:19 PM
  #18  
Porschetech3's Avatar
Porschetech3
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,657
Likes: 6,911
From: Alabama USA
Default

Originally Posted by plpete84
I actually wouldn't mind a cab but what kills is for me is the aesthetics of the rear window. Coupe just looks much better IMHO. Having said that, I thought the original GT3 actually used the C4 chassis in RWD config because it was more rigid. I think this is why some folks remove the front diff and axles if they are building a track toy.
I agree, the hardtop styling looks a little goofy around the rear side windows, it needs some help...and some sort of an Aero wing on the lid.


Reply
Old Aug 12, 2021 | 04:28 PM
  #19  
Optionman1's Avatar
Optionman1
Drifting
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 2,162
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by peterp
I haven't driven a cab, so can't provide any feedback on driving feel versus a coupe, but the weight difference is 174 lbs additional for the cab on a C2 (and 165 lbs additional on a C4).
174lbs with or without the hard top?
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2021 | 04:31 PM
  #20  
Snakebit's Avatar
Snakebit
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 338
Likes: 167
From: Coastal Texas
Default

I gotta take the risk of public scrutiny and say that the more I look at that thing the more I like it. If it's as pristine as the mileage and the pictures imply, I don't think it's overpriced.

But only real life local viewing can confirm
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2021 | 05:06 PM
  #21  
peterp's Avatar
peterp
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 954
From: NJ/NY area
Default

Originally Posted by Optionman1
174lbs with or without the hard top?
That is a great question! I don't know. Apparently the hardtop itself weighs 74 lbs (https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...op-weight.html). It's difficult to know whether Porsche included it in there official spec weight for the Cab (Porsche's spec weights for each model are where the 174 lb difference was derived from).

I think the cabs did come standard with a hardtop (with a delete option for something like $1500 credit to the buyer), so it seems more likely than not they would have included it in the base model weight. The answer is pretty important -- means it would be only 100 lbs more for the Cab in convertible form. Of course, if it's not included, then that means the cab would be 248 lbs heavier with the hardtop on.

Hopefully someone knows and will chime in with the answer.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2021 | 06:27 PM
  #22  
barbancourt's Avatar
barbancourt
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 859
Likes: 513
Default

Originally Posted by 4Driver4
Looks like a narrow body in the pics.
The C4 is a narrow body like the C2. The C4S and Turbo are the wide bodies.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2021 | 10:18 PM
  #23  
Boff's Avatar
Boff
Racer
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 299
Likes: 233
From: London, ON
Default

The next convertible that looks good with the top up will be the first.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2021 | 11:31 PM
  #24  
Snakebit's Avatar
Snakebit
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 338
Likes: 167
From: Coastal Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Boff
The next convertible that looks good with the top up will be the first.
Would the NC PRHT Miata be a convertible in your book?


Reply
Old Aug 13, 2021 | 12:57 AM
  #25  
brontosaurus's Avatar
brontosaurus
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 785
From: Minneapolis
Default


The NC looks better as a convertible + hardtop than the PRHT. Not a fan at all of the PRHT profile.

Weirdly enough, I really dig the 996+hardtop look. I know it's goofy, but it's like, BMW Clownshoe goofy.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2021 | 08:03 AM
  #26  
Boff's Avatar
Boff
Racer
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 299
Likes: 233
From: London, ON
Default

Originally Posted by Snakebit
Would the NC PRHT Miata be a convertible in your book?

Looks passable from that angle but others are not so flattering. Rear window looks strange.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2021 | 10:38 AM
  #27  
masc243's Avatar
masc243
Thread Starter
Track Day
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 18
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by philbert996
It’s a C2





Looks nice but the hardtop paint looks….. a little off

How can you tell based on the picture? And where did you find this particular photo?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2021 | 12:54 PM
  #28  
philbert996's Avatar
philbert996
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 1,450
From: Philly Burbs
Default

Originally Posted by masc243
How can you tell based on the picture? And where did you find this particular photo?
The front trunk of a C4 looks different because of the front differential.

There’s 30+ photos in the link you posted.
Both of the pics are from there.
Reply




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:02 PM.