Notices
996 Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:

Stock air box vs. K+N CAI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2020, 08:38 PM
  #1  
Gregs04.5
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gregs04.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Under one of my cars somewhere in Wisconsin
Posts: 378
Received 49 Likes on 34 Posts
Default Stock air box vs. K+N CAI

I just recently picked up the 2000 996 shown on the left, there are a few issues (IMSB is not one of them, thankfully)
While searching codes P0154, and P1119, I saw a common thing, that is the K+N cai. The PO did keep, and give me the original air box, I think I'll swap it back in.
I'm thinking the K+N flows more air, but at a lower velocity, thus messing with the expected values from the MAF.

Any thoughts?

Thanks, Greg

Last edited by Gregs04.5; 03-21-2020 at 11:08 PM.
Old 03-20-2020, 09:09 PM
  #2  
wyovino
Rennlist Member
 
wyovino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,563
Received 635 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

There are many, many threads about that here. Most would suggest that you re-install the original air box . Your car, your choice. But I would read the threads. And congratulations!
The following users liked this post:
Ratchet1025 (03-22-2020)
Old 03-20-2020, 09:16 PM
  #3  
hatchetf15
Rennlist Member
 
hatchetf15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Mt Juliet, TN
Posts: 2,180
Received 1,044 Likes on 645 Posts
Default

^^^+1
Old 03-20-2020, 09:49 PM
  #4  
dporto
Rennlist Member
 
dporto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: L.I. NY
Posts: 6,794
Received 1,169 Likes on 797 Posts
Default

Original or 997.1 air-box only anything else is a compromise.
The following users liked this post:
Raven 666 (03-22-2020)
Old 03-20-2020, 09:57 PM
  #5  
Flyfishnick
Rennlist Member
 
Flyfishnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Des Moines, WA
Posts: 487
Received 186 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

All I can say is that I was in exact same boat. PO just installed before selling to me, I got codes, cleared them and they kept coming back every few weeks, so I went back to stock and have never had a code in 2 years. Sold the K&N kit to 808Bill and he has had no issues. Can't explain it why it works for him and not me--definitely odd for sure.
Old 03-20-2020, 10:02 PM
  #6  
az968gpw
Rennlist Member
 
az968gpw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,134
Received 196 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

You can certainly swap them and see the differences, easy job. You'll likely gain a few hp and lose a few codes.
Old 03-20-2020, 10:03 PM
  #7  
Gregs04.5
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gregs04.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Under one of my cars somewhere in Wisconsin
Posts: 378
Received 49 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

I have the stock air box, and am convinced that re-installing it is a good idea. I need this to run without codes so I can pass emissions here.

Thanks, Greg
Old 03-21-2020, 03:44 AM
  #8  
Weazer
Racer
 
Weazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 433
Received 201 Likes on 130 Posts
Default

When I purchased my 996, it came with a new K&N cold air kit uninstalled. So I installed it and got one code, cleared the code and it never came back. I like the look and sound of it compared to the original, and it has a sheet metal box/shroud that isolates the conical air filter from the rest of the engine compartment and vents directly to the original cold air snorkel. I dig it and its not causing me any problems, so I'm keeping it!
Old 03-21-2020, 04:33 AM
  #9  
pdxmotorhead
Three Wheelin'
 
pdxmotorhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA/Oregon
Posts: 1,695
Received 399 Likes on 297 Posts
Default

One key to a MAF functioning correctly is laminar flow across it,, I would not be a bit surprised if
the root of the problem is the positioning of the sensor and the overall install of the Filter.
Hot wire MAF sensors don't like buffeting air, its why many applications have a honeycomb air director
before them in the intake. The more tube in front of the MAF the better (to a point) And
avoiding anything that would cause the air to tumble ..

If the oiling is uneven on a K&N it can do
some weird stuff. I switched out a Hilllborn K&N setup to a Foam Media system and it got rid of
some surging problems when the car hit cross winds.. The car pulled better a thte top end with the
K&N so the owner like to run it..

Eventually changed the hood on the Sprint to go lower on the
leading side and that fixed the issue, and this wasn't even a electronic system.

I eventually figured out how to really get a good consistent coat
using a cheap harbor freight paint gun to apply the oil.
And run a over filter sock so I could pull it off between heats and
put a clean one on to easily get rid of the mud that would build up.
(Remember this K&N was 30" long, 14 wide and 14 high.. It covered the whole system. )






Old 03-21-2020, 10:58 AM
  #10  
az968gpw
Rennlist Member
 
az968gpw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,134
Received 196 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

My 996 came with an Evolution Motorsports air box. Never any codes. Air box includes a snorkle so it pulls in outside air just like a stock box. Dry air filter cone so it doesn't get oil on the MAF. I like the looks and sounds and it probably adds a few hp.

Had a k&n on my 968 with the modified air box and it was great, esp since the air box forced in outside air thru velocity stacks.

Have an AES cold air intake on my Tacoma with a Green filter and love it. It also has a forced air intake.

But I've read not good things about the k&n with the 996. I think it the lack of forced air so it pulls hot air from the engine compartment, thus robbing hp and seems to throw error codes.

YMMV.
Old 03-21-2020, 11:08 AM
  #11  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,053
Received 809 Likes on 545 Posts
Default

Over oiling is the biggest issue fouling MAF's..
Old 03-21-2020, 11:12 AM
  #12  
lowpue
Rennlist Member
 
lowpue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,525
Received 544 Likes on 263 Posts
Default

Dundon tested air temp and HP with and without cold airbox. We got better performance with stock. We found that more engine heat was sucked in with cold air kits....in my case we measured 20F higher air temp for "cold" air kit....
The following 4 users liked this post by lowpue:
808Bill (03-21-2020), Elumere (03-21-2020), Ratchet1025 (03-22-2020), Raven 666 (03-22-2020)
Old 03-21-2020, 11:21 AM
  #13  
808Bill
Rennlist Member
 
808Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Kauai
Posts: 8,053
Received 809 Likes on 545 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lowpue
Dundon tested air temp and HP with and without cold airbox. We got better performance with stock. We found that more engine heat was sucked in with cold air kits....in my case we measured 20F higher air temp for "cold" air kit....
I believe it.
My new motor will go back to stock (not quite) 3.8 upgraded airbox if I can find one.
Old 03-21-2020, 11:24 AM
  #14  
lowpue
Rennlist Member
 
lowpue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,525
Received 544 Likes on 263 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 808Bill
I believe it.
My new motor will go back to stock (not quite) 3.8 upgraded airbox if I can find one.
Definitely the way to go. Totally agree
Old 03-21-2020, 01:13 PM
  #15  
Flat6 Innovations
Former Vendor
 
Flat6 Innovations's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cleveland Georgia
Posts: 6,968
Received 2,293 Likes on 903 Posts
Default

If you want a choppy idle, MAF readings that are improper at idle, and hotter air inlet temperatures, go ahead and buy an aftermarket system.

Last week we made 480HP with a bone stock 3.8L OEM airbox. #FACT
The following 3 users liked this post by Flat6 Innovations:
808Bill (03-22-2020), Flyfishnick (03-22-2020), pdxmotorhead (03-21-2020)


Quick Reply: Stock air box vs. K+N CAI



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:51 PM.