UMW stage 2 kit - up and running at last :O)
#31
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Great display of data! Thanks Ace and Phelix for sharing all this. 6-8 deg. C still in the UK?
we're seeing 36C today! ![banghead](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/banghead.gif)
Edit: The long Gs data (acceleration) has a problem, the numbers are not realistic.
![EEK!](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
![EEK!](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
![banghead](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/banghead.gif)
Edit: The long Gs data (acceleration) has a problem, the numbers are not realistic.
Last edited by Jean; 03-28-2008 at 02:16 PM.
#33
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#34
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes extrapolation of acceleration shows that the car has more hp and torque than TB993TT and much higher than Phelix or Bill S. (60-130 in 9s.), looks like around 600hp. The speed vs. time does not reflect that however, to be accurate.
I do think that the car should be running less than 10s especially in that cold, so it is realistic, however with the above in mind and a top speed of 126mph only, I would do another run to confirm and get more accurate data for proper analysis purposes (boost vs. torque vs IAT).
I do think that the car should be running less than 10s especially in that cold, so it is realistic, however with the above in mind and a top speed of 126mph only, I would do another run to confirm and get more accurate data for proper analysis purposes (boost vs. torque vs IAT).
#36
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I had thought that the consensus was that Bill S's RUF TurboR had a conservative 490-500 hp, with times in the mid 8's, Toby with a bit more, and Phelix speculating at around 470 with the UMW Stage 2 with the 1.35 bar max boost program.
#37
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ace's software that is loaded in his '96 ECU is not Stage 2. It has been modified to reduce boost, the timing map has also been altered.
#43
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well as there's so much negativity going around the tuning scene I will sum up that i'm as happy as a happy thing on prozac. Sub 10 seconds 60-130 kind of confirms my buttometer reading of 10-15% which makes it the tuning bargain of the century I think..
Cost break down for anyone in the UK
Turbos, ECU & lots of bits like MAF etc. APX £4000+vat
Cats & new exhausts £1000+vat
Installation £750+vat
Plus a load of bits which drop off that may/may not always need doing £500
Diamond ring for the other half £7500 (what I blow on the car I had to blow on her too)
So all in £6250+vat.
Cost break down for anyone in the UK
Turbos, ECU & lots of bits like MAF etc. APX £4000+vat
Cats & new exhausts £1000+vat
Installation £750+vat
Plus a load of bits which drop off that may/may not always need doing £500
Diamond ring for the other half £7500 (what I blow on the car I had to blow on her too)
So all in £6250+vat.
#45
Pro
Thread Starter