Notices
993 Turbo Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The real 100-300kph ultimate hp test thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2008, 06:25 AM
  #151  
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Felix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,750
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Not sure I would want to pay the difference between kits 1 and 6 to take a measly 2.6 seconds off my 0-300 time. That's €66K not well spent!

Those numbers smell funny.
Old 04-01-2008, 07:13 AM
  #152  
MOD500
Racer
 
MOD500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Heard back from Herr. Schnarr, who says the issue of Sport Auto out on the 11th April will have 0 - 300 km / h data in there, and in the mean time to look at the numbers from this 544PS car test:

http://www.cargraphic.de/stepone/dat...Auto0308_1.pdf

Last edited by MOD500; 04-01-2008 at 07:31 AM.
Old 04-01-2008, 09:34 AM
  #153  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,050
Received 1,226 Likes on 599 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jussi
Did you use 1.2 factor as air density?
I get those same numbers if I use 9.5% for transmission loss, I think that transmission loss is bit more for AWD.. maybe 17%,
so that would make
00 mph = 317 hp
10 mph = 371 hp
15 mph = 400 hp
20 mph = 431 hp
or do you have 2WD?
Good pickup Jussi. My calcs were erroneously based on 2wd losses. Your #'s make more sense because the long G's really start to flatten up there
Old 04-01-2008, 09:49 AM
  #154  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,050
Received 1,226 Likes on 599 Posts
Default

Some other #'s from the Mile -

996GT2 700 evo kit - 176 mph
997TT evo shop car - 190.010 mph (my guess was this car was extensively tweaked - they were running PIWIS diagnostics on it all day)
Dinan E60M5 stage II (intake, throttle bodies, exhaust, tune) - 164 mph

Here is another plot from the next run. The top speed actually dropped 1mph but I shifted at about 7k rpms instead of 6500-7600 in the 1st run. Was able to get 130.59mph at 1320 feet:

http://www.picvault.info/images/5370...le%20speed.jpg

The wind got progressively stronger thru the day, and was enough to knock one motorcycle rider down! Fortunately he survived with only road rash and some minor fracture IIRC. This next run above was actually filmed by a helicopter. When I get that video I'll post it as well.
Old 04-02-2008, 02:43 AM
  #155  
Freak997tt
Banned
 
Freak997tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My non-sport car with Protomotive upgraded vtg's , exhaust , intercoolers and ecu with 2 passengers and pump gas ran

0-100 3.2sec
100-200 7sec
200-300 18sec

0-300 28sec

My friend in Greece has same mods plus headers ( his cas has SC ) ran

0-100 3.1sec
100-200 6.3-6.4sec
Old 04-03-2008, 06:05 AM
  #156  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

I posted this on one of your 997tt threads - but it is probably more pertinent here...
Some more data:
Apparatently they tested the Cargraphic/RST 598PS 997tt and it did 0-300kph in 26s with the 645PS version doing 23s (this is one with the $$$$$ intercoolers).

Eclou I note on another forum that AWE will be pricing your kit near the Ruf 550 kit - is that around $15K ?

I know its always "we need more data" but with that head wind and the heat/humidity we/I may be underrating your car's real output. Do you have any suitable "track" straights where you can wind it up again - even a squirt to 160mph will tell us plenty (since you have already proven that the motor can pull sustained Gs to 300 !)
Old 04-03-2008, 06:21 AM
  #157  
Stummel
Pro
 
Stummel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
... even a squirt to 160mph will tell us plenty...
That could have been me
Old 04-03-2008, 09:06 AM
  #158  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,050
Received 1,226 Likes on 599 Posts
Default

23s to 300 is just insane! I don't think the wind could make that much difference. The CG/RST car is immensely strong. I may not have a chance to get data to 160mph responsibly, but can safely get some 130mph data on the next 60-130 competition (I might have to contact a divorce attorney if my wife found me sneaking out at 4am to get a cool blast on the open freeway....)
Old 04-03-2008, 11:34 AM
  #159  
Felix
Addict
Rennlist Lifetime Member
 
Felix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,750
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
I might have to contact a divorce attorney if my wife found me sneaking out at 4am to get a cool blast on the open freeway....
She should be pleased that's all you're sneaking out for...
Old 04-04-2008, 05:13 AM
  #160  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
23s to 300 is just insane! I don't think the wind could make that much difference. The CG/RST car is immensely strong. I may not have a chance to get data to 160mph responsibly, but can safely get some 130mph data on the next 60-130 competition (I might have to contact a divorce attorney if my wife found me sneaking out at 4am to get a cool blast on the open freeway....)
One of the beauties of these power levels is that the blast 100-250 takes less than half a mile + braking distance - surely you have such a stretch nearbye ?

Geeez if I was that way inclined I could easily do this two or three times on my 20 mile journey to/from work (and I work in a major city), "if" I was that way inclined
Old 04-04-2008, 05:13 AM
  #161  
Freak997tt
Banned
 
Freak997tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TB993tt
I posted this on one of your 997tt threads - but it is probably more pertinent here...
Some more data:
Apparatently they tested the Cargraphic/RST 598PS 997tt and it did 0-300kph in 26s with the 645PS version doing 23s (this is one with the $$$$$ intercoolers).

Eclou I note on another forum that AWE will be pricing your kit near the Ruf 550 kit - is that around $15K ?

I know its always "we need more data" but with that head wind and the heat/humidity we/I may be underrating your car's real output. Do you have any suitable "track" straights where you can wind it up again - even a squirt to 160mph will tell us plenty (since you have already proven that the motor can pull sustained Gs to 300 !)
DAMN!!!

I just check CG website

LKP97T598
440KW / 598PS / 6280 1/min
811Nm / 3770 1/min
Price: 19.995,00 EUR /5

consists of:
Sportexhaust,
Sport air filter,
DME control unit exchange,
Manifoldset,
Turbochargers modified LH + RH exchange,
Airpipeset,
Pressure plate Sport 890Nm

GALKP97T598
TÜV-certificate for
LKP97T598
Price: 750,00 EUR /10

ATTENTION!
For the fitment of the airpipeset and pressure plate the engine needs to be removed!


---


LKP97T645
474KW / 645PS / 6750 1/min
855Nm / 4000 1/min
Price: 59.995,00 EUR /6

consists of:
Sportexhaust,
Sport air filter,
DME control unit exchange,
Manifoldset,
Turbochargers modified LH + RH exchange,
Airpipeset,
Intercooler LH + RH,
Inlet plenum,
Single mass Sport clutch kit,
3.8L piston and steellinerset,
Conrodset 3.8L,
Gasketset 3.8L,
Additional fuelpumpkit,
Engine conversion,
Dynorun

ATTENTION!
Engineconversion only in house!
For Motorsport use it is necessary to fit gearbox cooling kits for front- and rearaxle!


So modded vtg's on CG698 kit and Gerrett turbos on CG645 kit?

I mean Protomotive 997 GT30's still has stock engine , cams..etc and made 830hp

Last edited by Freak997tt; 04-04-2008 at 05:37 AM.
Old 04-04-2008, 06:17 AM
  #162  
TB993tt
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
TB993tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,441
Received 108 Likes on 68 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Freak997tt

So modded vtg's on CG598 kit and Gerrett turbos on CG645 kit?
Both kits have the same modded VTGs - RS claim they are "spezial" from their racing relationship with KKK - but then all the other tuners claim something similar
Originally Posted by Freak997tt
I mean Protomotive 997 GT30's still has stock engine , cams..etc and made 830hp
Doesn't this thread and in particular the discussion of the acceleration of Eclou's AWE 700hp make you want to know the actual on road acceleration of Protomotive's 830hp kit rather than the "hp" numbers which (when coming from 9s chassis dyno run) means little in relation to engine dyno "Porsche" standard hp ?

If it really has 830 equivalent hp then 0-300kph will be in what, 17s ?

RS Tuning apparently limit the torque on the first few kits to sub 820NM and for kits with more torque than this they build engines with Carrillo rods since the stock rods will bend over these levels. The Protomotive 830hp you quote will have 950NM (@ peak power ~6200rpm) so maybe it has magic rods ( or maybe the torque is measured differently for a different audience )?
Old 04-04-2008, 03:19 PM
  #163  
Jean
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Jean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,445
Received 169 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Freak997tt
I mean Protomotive 997 GT30's still has stock engine , cams..etc and made 830hp
Freak997TT

I think your timing of 0-300kph in 28 seconds is outstanding. I believe you have sent me the data of your DBOX once, if so, I can tell you what your car is putting in real life.

As to Protomotive's 830 bhp, I think there is no heroism in building an engine with those power levels on stock internals, that has now been proven so many times with all those 996TTs putting mad chassis dyno numbers and insane boost levels and then end up disappearing from the scenery.

Knowing Todd very well, I know that he does not approve or encourage such setups but he does have to listen to what his customers want or he will loose them to the tuner next door, and unfortunately for him he does not have racing teams backing him up financially. At least he warns them, and also he has full control of his tuning as he does it himself, which helps.

More importantly, those 830hp numbers are simply incorrect, just like almost everyone elses that we see lately everywhere, it is just getting worse with time and out of control, the numbers are insane and completely irrelevant, especially when it comes to torque curves and peak torque numbers thrown out there. Everyone talks about efficiency of engines blablabla, intake this and that, better fueling, state of the art intercoolers for $2-3k , special injectors and what have you, yet we have yet to see one of these zillion hp cars going below 20 seconds in a 0-300kph run, which is what this thread is about. The best I have seen so far around these forums on a 996TT/997TT has been 27-28 seconds I believe.

Funny enough I did today the calculations for Eddie Bello's recent run, where he clocked 226mph in one mile, the 0-300 kph must have been around 15-16 seconds, I estimate his HP to be around 750FWHP, with his aerodynamics and weight (IMO opinion around 2500lbs), sounds impossible, but trust me it is not far off. On a lightened 3000 lbs 996TT, the same run would have needed another 200HP....All of this is theoretical, but will not be too far off the reality.

Let us not forget the GTR 750 that did it in 21.3 seconds, and it was not a prototype running 2500 lbs and special one off custom made stuff, just a car that the magazine took and tested Independently. Some others like 9FF did 0-300kph in 21.2 with 780HP.

I for one would love to see one of these cars going below 20seconds, but so far I have not seen anything close to it.

Last edited by Jean; 04-05-2008 at 01:43 AM.
Old 04-06-2008, 05:49 AM
  #164  
Freak997tt
Banned
 
Freak997tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

All respect for CG/RS tuning and Protomotive..They r the best in the world IMO!!
Old 04-06-2008, 09:29 AM
  #165  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,050
Received 1,226 Likes on 599 Posts
Default

It is possible that some of the discrepancies in calcs vs performance may be simply due to factoring in overdrive gearing. In the 0-300 the last pull (in my car at least) is in 6th which is overdriven so the engine has to put out say 1.2(x) HP and TQ at the crank to achieve the required (x) HP at the wheels. Assuming a car needs 575hp to hit the 300kph in 5280ft with a given drag and time then the car has to achieve ~690hp at the crank before the power gets reduced by 0.79 OD gearing in 6th.


Quick Reply: The real 100-300kph ultimate hp test thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:07 PM.