993 Twin Turbo or F355 Berlinetta
#31
#32
Registered User
Well, I'm in the same boat. Cross-shopping a 993 turbo vs. testarossa/348/355. It would be nice to have a ferrari at least once, to experience what it is all about. The concern regarding repair bills is mounting. I never had problems with my porsches, and could drive aggressively without fear of bankrupting myself.
I have already had nightmares about taking a ferrari on a course or DE, I'm just not sure I could afford straining an already delicate car.
You buy ferrari's because they are rare and special...there is a certain WOW factor. Anyone who says they bought a Ferarri solely for performace, and not because it gathers attention, is delusional. Cars 1/3 the price can outperform it.
Porsches offer a great riding experience, and I believe in most instances are much faster that equivilant ferrari's. But quite frankly, very few folks notice porsches anymore, and they are becoming more mundane...
I got much more attention from folks in my 76 911s than in my Boxter S, 996, 944 turbo, etc. If you want attention/to feel special, most porsches don't do it anymore. The 993 turbo, that stills qualifies as unique...and special!
Tough calls.
I have already had nightmares about taking a ferrari on a course or DE, I'm just not sure I could afford straining an already delicate car.
You buy ferrari's because they are rare and special...there is a certain WOW factor. Anyone who says they bought a Ferarri solely for performace, and not because it gathers attention, is delusional. Cars 1/3 the price can outperform it.
Porsches offer a great riding experience, and I believe in most instances are much faster that equivilant ferrari's. But quite frankly, very few folks notice porsches anymore, and they are becoming more mundane...
I got much more attention from folks in my 76 911s than in my Boxter S, 996, 944 turbo, etc. If you want attention/to feel special, most porsches don't do it anymore. The 993 turbo, that stills qualifies as unique...and special!
Tough calls.
#33
Drifting
At the end of the day, you only live once and you really have to go with what your heart is saying. Buying a car that is CAD$100k+ is an emotional decision for the most part. What is the realisit worst case scenerio? You might spend $20k on maintenance for a year. Factor that into your decision and assume you will spend that. If it doesn't break, you're $20k ahead.
A while back, I wanted to buy a Ducati superbike. All of my motorcycle friends told me all the horror stories they had heard, the $3k engine repairs of bikes that were only a few years old, etc, etc. I was told they are fragile track bikes, need constant maintenance and repair bills were more like a car than a bike. I factored in $5k in maintenance in my purchase decision for the first two years and decided to buy the bike.
I put a set of carbon pipes on the bike and a DP chip. I did 15 (FIFTEEN!) track days on that bike in the first two years and another 8-9 in the last two years. I only did routine maintenance and replaced worn tires. The bike never let me down and I had none of the "common" problems. Sometimes you luck out I guess. I do not regret buying the bike and enjoyed it greatly. I recently sold it when I bought the 993 Turbo and it even held its value really well too.
Factor in the worst case scenerio and if the Ferrari still makes you go weak at the knees, go for it!
A while back, I wanted to buy a Ducati superbike. All of my motorcycle friends told me all the horror stories they had heard, the $3k engine repairs of bikes that were only a few years old, etc, etc. I was told they are fragile track bikes, need constant maintenance and repair bills were more like a car than a bike. I factored in $5k in maintenance in my purchase decision for the first two years and decided to buy the bike.
I put a set of carbon pipes on the bike and a DP chip. I did 15 (FIFTEEN!) track days on that bike in the first two years and another 8-9 in the last two years. I only did routine maintenance and replaced worn tires. The bike never let me down and I had none of the "common" problems. Sometimes you luck out I guess. I do not regret buying the bike and enjoyed it greatly. I recently sold it when I bought the 993 Turbo and it even held its value really well too.
Factor in the worst case scenerio and if the Ferrari still makes you go weak at the knees, go for it!
#34
Rennlist Member
Friend loaned a 355 to me for a few days.
IMHO - The Ferrari has one thing that makes me buy over a 993TT and that's the sound of the motor. It's performance is silky smooth and sounds like sex but I'd still drop my dollars on a Porsche. I prefer the all around flexibility of a 993TT.
IMHO - The Ferrari has one thing that makes me buy over a 993TT and that's the sound of the motor. It's performance is silky smooth and sounds like sex but I'd still drop my dollars on a Porsche. I prefer the all around flexibility of a 993TT.
Last edited by nota_troll; 10-16-2004 at 12:11 PM.
#35
If you like speed and reliability, the 993TT will win over the 355. However, the 360 is another story. I have a Challenge Stradale. It's an incredible car. There's no way I can keep up with it on a mountain road, even with my Ruf Turbo R. The car's throttle, steering, braking and shifting response is just too fast. It also accelerates the same as a stock 993TT or 996TT. The incredible straight-line high-speed stability, road view and sound add to the experience. If you like engineering, the Stradale is a winner also. Aluminum frame, panels, titanium engine and suspension parts, 8500 RPM redline, F1 paddle shifters, carbon brakes, active suspension, active traction control, and others add to the experience. I have a Ruf Turbo R which, in a straight line, is faster. However, when I drove my friend in the Stradale, he said "Your Ruf is fast, but this car is absolutely insane". It's just a totally different experience.
However, there is one important difference for me between the Porsche and the Ferrari (I've owned Porsche turbos for over 20 years, and just bought my first Ferrari). I don't drive the Ferrari as much for a few reasons:
1. I don't want to "wear-out" the experience (i.e., I get bored of things fast).
2. It's much more enjoyable to look at, and thus you feel obligated not to damage it too much (i.e., it has an "artwork" appeal about it).
3. All evidence points to the italians finally having the german reliability, but I'm a little reluctant to confirm that.
4. It attracts much more attention than most any other car, even my Viper. So, I'm reluctant to park it at the same places I'd park my Ruf.
However, there is one important difference for me between the Porsche and the Ferrari (I've owned Porsche turbos for over 20 years, and just bought my first Ferrari). I don't drive the Ferrari as much for a few reasons:
1. I don't want to "wear-out" the experience (i.e., I get bored of things fast).
2. It's much more enjoyable to look at, and thus you feel obligated not to damage it too much (i.e., it has an "artwork" appeal about it).
3. All evidence points to the italians finally having the german reliability, but I'm a little reluctant to confirm that.
4. It attracts much more attention than most any other car, even my Viper. So, I'm reluctant to park it at the same places I'd park my Ruf.
#36
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Bill,
Your Stradale is beautiful. If you don't mind me asking, how many miles do you have on it? What, if anything, has needed fixing?
What do you think about the upcoming 430? Looks like a great car.
BTW, fc racer, my 1999 Ducati was completely reliable as well.
Your Stradale is beautiful. If you don't mind me asking, how many miles do you have on it? What, if anything, has needed fixing?
What do you think about the upcoming 430? Looks like a great car.
BTW, fc racer, my 1999 Ducati was completely reliable as well.
#37
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: new york, new york
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
speaking of F-cars... whats the story on the new ferrari 475?? Is it the next model of the 360? or is it a big/heavy touring car? i looks beautiful, but i dont know anything else.
#38
Originally Posted by Anir
Bill,
Your Stradale is beautiful. If you don't mind me asking, how many miles do you have on it? What, if anything, has needed fixing?
What do you think about the upcoming 430? Looks like a great car.
BTW, fc racer, my 1999 Ducati was completely reliable as well.
Your Stradale is beautiful. If you don't mind me asking, how many miles do you have on it? What, if anything, has needed fixing?
What do you think about the upcoming 430? Looks like a great car.
BTW, fc racer, my 1999 Ducati was completely reliable as well.
Regarding the 430. It will have more horsepower and torque, so it will be faster than a 360 and clearly an improvement over that car. However, I'm not sure how much better it will be than the Stradale. It may be a bit faster in a straight line, but not much. The Stradale has 425 HP and weighs about 3000 lbs. The 430 has 483 HP and will likely weigh more. However, comparing the Stradale to the 430 would be like comparing the Porsche GT3 to the Porsche 996TT. They're both nearly as fast in a straight line, but the GT3 is more of a track car. That's like the Stradale: lightweight, stiff, low, loud and no sound insulation. That's what I like. The 430 will likely be more refined.
Now, a "430 Stradale" would be a different story.
Most people don't realize that the 430 is not a completely new car, but an upgraded 360, unlike the 355 to 360 transitions. Regarding looks, I don't care for the smaller headlights and the larger overall look much, but that may change when I see the car in person.
430 pics...
Last edited by Bill S.; 10-16-2004 at 02:29 PM.
#39
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by Bill S.
However, comparing the Stradale to the 430 would be like comparing the Porsche GT3 to the Porsche 996TT. They're both nearly as fast in a straight line, but the GT3 is more of a track car. That's like the Stradale: lightweight, stiff, low, loud and no sound insulation. That's what I like. The 430 will likely be more refined.
Most people don't realize that the 430 is not a completely new car, but an upgraded 360, unlike the 355 to 360 transitions.
#40
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Bill,
Nice stable of cars you have. I knew about your Ruf but this Stradale is just plain gorgeous.
I am afraid however that we are not doing the right comparisons.
- Ferrari 355 vs stock 993TT as far as performance on nice twisty roads, the 993TT has beaten every single time the F 355 by a margin and with the same driver (me ).
- 993TT vs 360 Modena, the 993TT beat it, but to be fair, I was not used to the Modena and my time improved on the third run to get closer to 993TT with a difference of 4 seconds over a 3 mile distance.
- 993 platform TT or RUF vs Stradale, not a fair comparison, a fair one would be a GT3 RS with the Stradale, still costing about 1/2 the price, it will be very very tight challenge, the best driver winning.
I have driven the GT3 RS a few times and have seen it on the track beat all the 996TTs (except a 750 Gemballa) and GT2s by a margin of 3-4 seconds with a medium/fast driver on board.. that same driver was 2-3 seconds behind the leaders when he was driving in his 600 hp 996TT.
Nothing beats the looks and sound though of a Ferrari, and if money was not an issue, I would definitely pick a Stradale over a GT3RS anyday, let alone a 993TT.
Thanks for sharing your experiences with those unique cars you have.
Viken, I understand you have a 360 and a GT3, what is your opinion as far as performance between the two, I would guess they are very close other than in straight line.
Jean
Nice stable of cars you have. I knew about your Ruf but this Stradale is just plain gorgeous.
I am afraid however that we are not doing the right comparisons.
- Ferrari 355 vs stock 993TT as far as performance on nice twisty roads, the 993TT has beaten every single time the F 355 by a margin and with the same driver (me ).
- 993TT vs 360 Modena, the 993TT beat it, but to be fair, I was not used to the Modena and my time improved on the third run to get closer to 993TT with a difference of 4 seconds over a 3 mile distance.
- 993 platform TT or RUF vs Stradale, not a fair comparison, a fair one would be a GT3 RS with the Stradale, still costing about 1/2 the price, it will be very very tight challenge, the best driver winning.
I have driven the GT3 RS a few times and have seen it on the track beat all the 996TTs (except a 750 Gemballa) and GT2s by a margin of 3-4 seconds with a medium/fast driver on board.. that same driver was 2-3 seconds behind the leaders when he was driving in his 600 hp 996TT.
Nothing beats the looks and sound though of a Ferrari, and if money was not an issue, I would definitely pick a Stradale over a GT3RS anyday, let alone a 993TT.
Thanks for sharing your experiences with those unique cars you have.
Viken, I understand you have a 360 and a GT3, what is your opinion as far as performance between the two, I would guess they are very close other than in straight line.
Jean
Last edited by Jean; 10-17-2004 at 07:47 AM.
#41
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by Jean
993TT vs 360 Modena, the 993TT beat it, but to be fair, I was not used to the Modena and my time improved on the third run to get closer to 993TT with a difference of 4 seconds over a 3 mile distance.
Originally Posted by Jean
Viken, I understand you have a 360 and a GT3, what is your opinion as far as performance between the two, I would guess they are very close other than in straight line.
For a mere mortal like myself, the 360 out of the box with factory installed street tires handles better, grips better and gives better and more linear road feedback. The GT3 can come close with some R-compound tires and a tweaked alignment, but will always fall short in the bumpy pavement test. I have driven the Challenge Stradale extensively and it is a vast improvement over the 360 Modena in every respect. Although I have not driven a GT3 RS, I doubt that its improvements over the standard GT3 are as substantial. At least, that's what most of the ROW press has reported.
#42
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Great insight Viken, you have described with so much precision the differences in handling, thank you for your input.
Without wanting to hijack this thread, I would just like to add that the latest GT3s and GT3 RS have been known to have a problem with the front suspension whereas the steering feels a bit "loose" especially on bumpy roads. Some European tuners have identified this as being a problem with a bushing in the front suspension, and fixed it, the improvement being important apparently.
The GT3 RS has been tested by Flat 6 magazine at 2.4" faster than the latest generation GT3 on a 2kms track, around 1.6 miles, which is substantial. Suspension mods, modifications to the heads and around 100 lbs lighter than the GT3.
Again apologies for the hijack.
Without wanting to hijack this thread, I would just like to add that the latest GT3s and GT3 RS have been known to have a problem with the front suspension whereas the steering feels a bit "loose" especially on bumpy roads. Some European tuners have identified this as being a problem with a bushing in the front suspension, and fixed it, the improvement being important apparently.
The GT3 RS has been tested by Flat 6 magazine at 2.4" faster than the latest generation GT3 on a 2kms track, around 1.6 miles, which is substantial. Suspension mods, modifications to the heads and around 100 lbs lighter than the GT3.
Again apologies for the hijack.
#43
One thing I might add regarding the F-cars: their high-speed stability is extraordinary. My wife, who often doesn't notice subtle performance differences, commented on how incredibly stable the CS feels at high speed. It's just feels like an arrow slicing through the air. The P-cars wander all over the place at similar speeds, especially the 993.
BTW, the CS and GT3 accelerate nearly identically. Here's info from Car & Driver magazine:
0-60: 4.0 seconds
0-150: 23.9 seconds
1/4-mile: 115 @ 12.4 (CS); 114 @ 12.3 (GT3)
BTW, the CS and GT3 accelerate nearly identically. Here's info from Car & Driver magazine:
0-60: 4.0 seconds
0-150: 23.9 seconds
1/4-mile: 115 @ 12.4 (CS); 114 @ 12.3 (GT3)
#44
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fishers, Indiana (USA) and Barrie, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bill S.
One thing I might add regarding the F-cars: their high-speed stability is extraordinary. My wife, who often doesn't notice subtle performance differences, commented on how incredibly stable the CS feels at high speed. It's just feels like an arrow slicing through the air. The P-cars wander all over the place at similar speeds, especially the 993...
Hmm..I find this interesting. Having driven our '95 993 Carrera 4 Cabriloet at about 175 mph I thought it was very stable and planted. No wandering whatsoever. I also piloted a '90 348ts at about 170 mph and felt stable, but a little more jittery than the 993 Cab. What I really need to do is drive an F355 and see how it compares.
#45
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by Meeyatch1
Hmm..I find this interesting. Having driven our '95 993 Carrera 4 Cabriloet at about 175 mph I thought it was very stable and planted. No wandering whatsoever. I also piloted a '90 348ts at about 170 mph and felt stable, but a little more jittery than the 993 Cab. What I really need to do is drive an F355 and see how it compares.