Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Question regarding replacing engine mounts.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2013, 03:01 PM
  #1  
crw
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
crw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 353 Likes on 210 Posts
Default Question regarding replacing engine mounts.

It seems that many people do this and comment that the car handles better.

How so?
Old 04-14-2013, 03:25 PM
  #2  
chaoscreature
Burning Brakes
 
chaoscreature's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vista, CA
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

It doesn't necessarily make the car handle better, but what it does do is give you a better feel for the car. The engine will feel more connected to your rear end.

If the engine mounts are worn enough that the engine is shifting around a lot in the engine compartment that could actually throw the handling out a bit but I think it's more of a perceptual thing.

Do it, you won't regret it. WEVO mounts are very nice and have two stiffness options (start soft).
- Peter
Old 04-14-2013, 03:40 PM
  #3  
Texas993
Race Car
 
Texas993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 3,934
Received 22 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Less engine movement, better handling. Some sound improvement.

Lots of opinions here if the search function works. I did the Wevo mounts and like them.
Old 04-14-2013, 04:00 PM
  #4  
IXLR8
Rennlist Member
 
IXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada & the Alps
Posts: 8,492
Received 694 Likes on 482 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by crw
How so?
Some think they've gained 25 HP just because the exhaust is louder.

For street use.
Old 04-14-2013, 05:21 PM
  #5  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,521
Received 80 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Most stock mounts are sagging a bit, by now. My biggest improvement was smarter shifting from 1st-2nd, when accelerating hard.
Old 04-14-2013, 05:36 PM
  #6  
Al Z
Burning Brakes
 
Al Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

CRW

If you are thinking of replacing your engine mounts. I have a set of RS engine mounts with all the hardware needed to install with less then 50 miles on them. In other words almost New.
Al Z
Old 04-14-2013, 06:15 PM
  #7  
Paul902
Three Wheelin'
 
Paul902's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Hughes
My biggest improvement was smarter shifting from 1st-2nd, when accelerating hard.
Mine too. I used to crunch the box every time going into 2nd at a particular uphill lefthander at Calabogie. RS mounts fixed that.
Old 04-14-2013, 07:10 PM
  #8  
Ed Hughes
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 16,521
Received 80 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

The only NVH with my Porsche RS mounts is when the A/C compressor is on. I can hear a slight whirring noise, as it cycles.
Old 04-14-2013, 07:13 PM
  #9  
kg4nih
Intermediate
 
kg4nih's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As part of my recent suspension re-do (I was following your FSD/M033 DIY thread), I replaced the front control arm bushing w/ Elephant Racing sport hardness bushings (mine were shot) and swapped my original motor mounts for Wevo SS/blacks. The motor mounts were likely a "slippery slope" decision; changing the rear shocks required fiddling w/ the motor mounts, so I figured why not?

With just 300 miles and one DE day, I'm happy with the results. I can't say how much is attributable to replacing worn structs/shocks/control arm bushings, the lowered height, or the Wevo's.

But overall, the car feels more direct and planted w/o being harsh.
Old 04-14-2013, 07:32 PM
  #10  
Kika
Nordschleife Master
 
Kika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Torrance, CA USA
Posts: 5,632
Received 80 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

The difference depend on how bad your current motor mounts are.
In my case, my mounts were in pretty good shape, when I put WEVO blacks on. What I noticed was a little more direct feeling steering and shifting. It wasn't a huge difference, and there is a little more noise transmitted to the cabin, but after a few drives it becomes the standard and I don't even notice it.

Am I glad I did it? Sure, at some point in time they would have needed to be replaced anyway. Did they need to be replaced, no not really.with my other suspension mods though, I like the overall feel of the car and think that my car is better with the Wevos than the stock MMs.

Keep in mind, though, everyone has different levels of tolerance, and different tastes, my suggestion is to drive someone's car that has the Wevos, or the RS mounts to see if you like them.

I have driven Gonzillas car, who has the RS mounts with very similar suspension to my own, and I cannot really tell the difference between his car and my car. Except he has way cooler seats than I do.
Old 04-14-2013, 08:33 PM
  #11  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Al Z
I have a set of RS engine mounts with all the hardware needed to install with less then 50 miles on them.
How much?
Old 04-14-2013, 10:44 PM
  #12  
TMc993
Rennlist Member
 
TMc993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dahlonega, Georgia
Posts: 3,597
Received 554 Likes on 349 Posts
Default

My stock mounts were getting tired and as a result, the rear end had a vague feel to it. I put in a set of Wevo blacks and a TRG strut tower bar at the same time. The car does seem significantly more "planted" than before and the shifts are more precise as well.

YRMV....

Last edited by TMc993; 04-15-2013 at 05:18 PM. Reason: More info
Old 04-15-2013, 01:28 AM
  #13  
stickypatch
Rennlist Member
 
stickypatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 1994 tiptronic daily driver and changed the engine mounts to RS mounts. The gear changes on the tipo were much faster and tighter as a result and I had much better feel of the car through the throttle. Almost no change in vibration/noise that I could detect and I spend at least an hour in the car every day (11,000 kilometres in 6 months) so I noticed it - if it was a weekend car I don't think I would have been able to tell.
Old 04-15-2013, 02:25 AM
  #14  
Mike J
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike J's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 8,363
Received 71 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

I did this upgrade on both the Targa and Turbo - the stock mounts in both cars were in good shape - and honestly no difference that I could tell.

Maybe your mileage would be different with worn mounts.

Cheers,

Mike
Old 04-15-2013, 07:24 AM
  #15  
Guest89
Drifting
 
Guest89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CHI / ATL
Posts: 2,794
Received 202 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ed Hughes
Most stock mounts are sagging a bit, by now. My biggest improvement was smarter shifting from 1st-2nd, when accelerating hard.
Originally Posted by Ed Hughes
The only NVH with my Porsche RS mounts is when the A/C compressor is on. I can hear a slight whirring noise, as it cycles.
I had both observations; the improved shifting was very nice. The increased NVH is pretty slight for me - not an issue at all.


Quick Reply: Question regarding replacing engine mounts.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:57 AM.