When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I called two places today (dealer and independant) to get a leak down done for a PPI on my car I'm selling and both places denied me and told me its a waste of money. "The car is OBDII, if there was something wrong, the check engine light would be on." I guess I never thought of it that way, but they are right to a point. Im sure a cylinder could be getting close to high leak down percentages and still not have a CEL on. What do you guys think?
I agree, but this is the request of the buyer. In reading my PMs and emails and a lot of threads, it seems that a leak down test is the preferred test among buyers, I just never thought about it much from an OBDII perspective. Of couse if I mention it, it will loook like I'm just hiding something, or not wanting to get it done.
You want a leakdown test, not a compression test. The leakdown test will give you an idea of the health of an engine. This is particularly important on the 993 where the exhaust valves pit easily and lose their seat concentricity and begin to leak. OBD2 will not tell you mechanically that anything is wrong, it will only look at the symptom of a problem. ie CEL for SAI port BECAUSE the valve guides are worn and leaking, plugging the ports.
Unless you knew the previous owner and car from new, I would get a leakdown and compression test. It is cheap insurance especially if did not know how car was driven and maintained in the past.
A leak down test is far more informative than compression test. I strongly recommend having one done by any perspective 911 buyer. Its a bit time consuming on a 993, so that may explain the service facility's
reluctance to do it. I would fine someone that will.
A leak down test is far more informative than compression test. I strongly recommend having one done by any perspective 911 buyer. Its a bit time consuming on a 993, so that may explain the service facility's
reluctance to do it. I would fine someone that will.
Good luck, Jerry
Yeah, what he said... Nice to see you posting Jerry. Also good to talk with you this week. Hopefully I will see you at least at the Glen in June or July....
So which one would occur first on a OBDII car? A CEL or bad leak down readings? In otherwords could a bad leak down catch a potetntial problem that OBDII hasnt recognized yet? I know OBDII is highly sensative. I think that is their point. I completely agree with pre OBDII cars.
And what is considered good/ bad readings?
Originally Posted by Geoffrey
You want a leakdown test, not a compression test. The leakdown test will give you an idea of the health of an engine. This is particularly important on the 993 where the exhaust valves pit easily and lose their seat concentricity and begin to leak. OBD2 will not tell you mechanically that anything is wrong, it will only look at the symptom of a problem. ie CEL for SAI port BECAUSE the valve guides are worn and leaking, plugging the ports.
A good leak down done correctly will expose engine issues before the same engine begins to misfire. It is the presence of misfires that will usually trigger the dreaded CEL. As for what is a good vs bad leakdown result can vary depending on many factors. We generally want to see leak down numbers under 10% but more importantly, the results should be fairly consistent from one cylinder to the next.
Porsche Reveals Coupe Variant of the Electric Cayenne With a Fresh Look
Slideshow: Porsche's latest electric Cayenne Coupe blends dramatic styling with supercar acceleration, turning the brand's midsize SUV into a 1,139-horsepower flagship.
One-Off Porsche 911 S/T Takes Inspiration From Famous '70s Race Car
Slideshow: A one-off Porsche 911 S/T created through the Sonderwunsch program pays tribute to a little-known 1970s race car from the Camel GT Challenge.