Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

992.2 World premiere

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2024, 03:12 PM
  #46  
TheGreatJ
Racer
 
TheGreatJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Right below the Northern Lights, when not travelling all around.
Posts: 307
Received 178 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
Standard 2 seater.

2+2 is an option now.

About time that changed.
This is another odd choice just for the sake of cost saving and better profits. Porsche 911 has remained a 4-seater (as a default) for 70 years, why start changing it now? (For other than the obvious reasons already mentioned..) Oh, the greed never ends..

Edit: I guess it's also because now they can state their car's "overall" weight without the back seats..

So, how much was the weight increase again between 992.1 and 992.2 (if you don't remove the back seats)? I bet 50 kgs isn't enough..

Last edited by TheGreatJ; 05-28-2024 at 03:15 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Needsdecaf (05-28-2024)
Old 05-28-2024, 03:14 PM
  #47  
PSPorsche
Burning Brakes
 
PSPorsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 753
Received 428 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Crusje
I think the semicircle base one looks way better.
We had the "fried egg" headlamps of the
1997 996.

Now we have the “Ringing Telephones” of 2024.

(I’m officially coining and Trade Marking this, so, journalists, please be sure to contact me. ;-) ).



The following 11 users liked this post by PSPorsche:
3uros (05-28-2024), Autobacs (05-28-2024), Dezeinstein (05-28-2024), GuardsRed992 (05-28-2024), KOTYKB (05-28-2024), Lebreeze (05-28-2024), nerdtalker (05-28-2024), NewShockerGuy (05-29-2024), silverscooby27 (05-28-2024), sycheah (05-28-2024), wang22101 (05-29-2024) and 6 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 05-28-2024, 03:22 PM
  #48  
GT4RSYMPHONY
Advanced
 
GT4RSYMPHONY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 74
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PSPorsche
We had the "fried egg" headlamps of the
1997 996.

Now we have the “Ringing Telephones” of 2024.

(I’m officially coining and Trade Marking this, so, journalists, please be sure to contact me. ;-) ).

How did they miss this?
Old 05-28-2024, 03:27 PM
  #49  
Autobacs
Racer
 
Autobacs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 368
Received 160 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Crusje
I think the semicircle base one looks way better.
I agree....it keeps more to the tradition but the base of old I think looks better than that.
Old 05-28-2024, 03:28 PM
  #50  
Maskman
Rennlist Member
 
Maskman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Western NY
Posts: 189
Received 95 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

I have mine S Cabriolet coming the end of July and absolutely agree with your post. Couldn’t be happier…so glad to have manual and the Heritage Interior!
Old 05-28-2024, 03:53 PM
  #51  
dhirm5
Rennlist Member
 
dhirm5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 2,609
Received 1,460 Likes on 801 Posts
Default

I'll be skipping this gen. Overall I like the hybrid, but not enough to jump right in and forego the manual transmission.
Old 05-28-2024, 04:16 PM
  #52  
VarTheVar
Rennlist Member
 
VarTheVar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 752
Received 721 Likes on 335 Posts
Default

What's interesting to me is that it sounds like the base Carrera now has the old Carrera GTS's turbos and a larger intercooler from the Turbo. That means the base 3.0LTT motor will now be more laggy. This is for emissions restrictions of maintaining Lambda throughout the entire rev range. The larger turbos and intercooler seems like they're being used to bring temperatures down so that Porsche can get away without fuel enrichment at the top end.

Also, Porsche hit the nail on the head in understanding what the GTS crowd is. More like Turbo and Turbo S customers than GT3, and that's what the car is geared for. Tech forward customers who care more about numbers and not so much about silly things like engagement, feel, lightweight, or manual gearboxes

Last edited by VarTheVar; 05-28-2024 at 04:18 PM.
Old 05-28-2024, 04:50 PM
  #53  
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Needsdecaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Woodlands, TX.
Posts: 8,903
Received 2,606 Likes on 1,619 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drcollie
Here is Car and Driver's take on it, with a photo set. Comes across to me as somewhat of an Emissions exercise. The internal water pump is scary - that's going to be quite pricey to replace I would imagine.

https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a6...Y6sMWVOnKFRQCQ

I think the value of my three pedal 992 S just went up. Looks like the manual trans is a thing of the past, or probably going to be left only for already unobtainable GT3's and special editions. Time marches on.....
This whole thing very much strikes me as an emissions exercise. Kind of reminds me of the malaise era of 150 hp 455 ci V8's. Look at all of this technology: more capacity (20%), electric drive motor and HV battery, electrically powered turbo....and for very negligible HP gain.

Internal water pump is not the only thing that's scary. Given the amount of sheer tech on this engine, literally the most minute thing will likely be a full engine out service. But, this is Porsche who determined that taking the bumper cap off on a 991 to change the air filter was normal so...maybe it's not so bad?

I dunno. I was hoping for more from this hybrid setup...as a current Porsche hybrid owner, we've loved our experience. On paper, this......really just seems like getting more of the same, with more complexity, just for lower emissions.
The following users liked this post:
drcollie (05-28-2024)
Old 05-28-2024, 05:26 PM
  #54  
detansinn
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
detansinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 5,676
Received 8,145 Likes on 3,010 Posts
Default

I look at the changes here with 992.2 as a real dilution of the 911 character and experience. I am sure that it's fast and I have no doubt that the throttle response is improved by the hybrid.
For the people who were complaining that the 992.1 was too slow, Porsche has the answer.

There will be people that love this 992.2 GTS. I hope that they do, because they're looking at $200k with just a few options checked off.

I loved the 992.1. I put over 35k miles on my C4S in 2.5 years.
For me, we'll see what the 994 brings. In the interim, I am going to go out and enjoy my 3 pedal 991.2 Targa.

I do want to thank Porsche for lifting values of every 3 pedal 911. It does appear that the rowing your own gears will be reserved for the GT cars and a maybe a non-Hybrid T.
The following 3 users liked this post by detansinn:
drcollie (05-28-2024), samsnc (05-28-2024), txpackers (05-29-2024)
Old 05-28-2024, 05:28 PM
  #55  
shrimp money
Race Car
 
shrimp money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,405
Received 5,189 Likes on 2,066 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Needsdecaf
This whole thing very much strikes me as an emissions exercise. Kind of reminds me of the malaise era of 150 hp 455 ci V8's. Look at all of this technology: more capacity (20%), electric drive motor and HV battery, electrically powered turbo....and for very negligible HP gain.

Internal water pump is not the only thing that's scary. Given the amount of sheer tech on this engine, literally the most minute thing will likely be a full engine out service. But, this is Porsche who determined that taking the bumper cap off on a 991 to change the air filter was normal so...maybe it's not so bad?

I dunno. I was hoping for more from this hybrid setup...as a current Porsche hybrid owner, we've loved our experience. On paper, this......really just seems like getting more of the same, with more complexity, just for lower emissions.

If you read the C&D article about the GTS released today, it is all about emissions. The boost itself is like 7psi more but only gets a few HP over the .1 version.
Old 05-28-2024, 06:19 PM
  #56  
K996
Racer
 
K996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Clearwater, FL
Posts: 353
Received 85 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by westsiderkg01
OMG, too funny....and fugly too! This looks cheapo, something more akin to if they brought back the beetle, not the 911.
Making the base headlights ugly is a tried and true Porsche way to get the upgrade box checked off.

The good news is that if you buy one, in 25 yrs they'll be quite rare as desirable "early build" cars. Getcher ringin' phone headlamps now fellas!
Old 05-28-2024, 06:32 PM
  #57  
TheMurse
Racer
 
TheMurse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 385
Received 592 Likes on 177 Posts
Default

I have a feeling that the value of my 997 has just increased a bit...

There's a lot about the 992.2 that is interesting if not immediately appealing.

I'm not married to the idea that the 911 absolutely positively must not under any circumstances have a hybrid powerplant. Until I drive it I'll reserve judgement on the new engine.

Exploring the configurator I found some oddities - can't have deviated color seatbelts if you select the GTS interior package? PASM reverts to Carrera S sway bars and eliminates helper springs while raising ride height?

The vent slats have grown on me a little but that rear end/tail pipe arrangement is just not quite right. I think what my eye gets caught on is the space between the tailpipes, perhaps side-by-side is too close to the design of a GT3? Not a huge fan of the aesthetics of the rear on base Carrera either.

Disappointing that the electric shaver shifter has survived. Such a significant touch point in the cabin deserves a bit more thought. Every time I see one I feel like I have to gently grasp it between thumb and forefinger like I'm carefully lifting one strand of slippery pasta from my plate.

And now we get to the pricing - as optioned (and I'll admit that I didn't hold back on a stripper build) my GTS would touch a quarter million after taxes and insurance ($220,665). The argument that Porsche is leaving money on the table has merit but the idea that a non-GT division product would exceed the 200k mark is just not something I've come to grips with. And all that is before ADM and allocation games reach even deeper into my pocket.

But wait! My 997 (original MSRP of $106k) would cost $170k in today's dollars so maybe my gripe isn't with Porsche at all.

So I'm interested, and willing to give the .2 a chance, but so far the want factor is pretty low. Driving one might be a revelation, and that possibility is exciting, but from today's unveiling I'm just not bowled over.
Old 05-28-2024, 06:33 PM
  #58  
drcollie
Race Car
 
drcollie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fairfax County, Virginia
Posts: 4,234
Received 4,192 Likes on 1,479 Posts
Default

I just ordered a 2025 Cayenne S Hybrid Coupe yesterday, coming from an ICE V8 2021 Cayenne GTS. The difference in the two vehicles is significant and quite amazing.

I can only hope the 992.2 proves likewise. I'm withholding judgement until I see / drive one later this year, but without a manual transmission I would just buy a Ferrari instead.
The following 3 users liked this post by drcollie:
AlexCeres (05-28-2024), silversurfer6 (05-28-2024), yronzff (05-29-2024)
Old 05-28-2024, 07:05 PM
  #59  
Wilder
Rennlist Member
 
Wilder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somewhere in Mexico
Posts: 6,593
Received 5,041 Likes on 1,794 Posts
Default

I just clocked 1,300 miles in a 1986 3.2 911 Carrera.
I drove from Germany to Belgium, then back to Germany, then Italy through Switzerland in twisty mountain passes.
I'm seriously considering replacing my 992 with an aircooled 911.
That car was the most FUN I've had driving in a long time and I also own a 7.2 GT3.
My thoughts on the 992.2 is that Porsche needs to stop being dragged into the idiotic HP race and use fun as the metric.
Fun = raw, light, manual, visceral, analog.
Sad to see Porsche transition from a bunch of passionate engineers to a bunch of pubco managers squeezing brand value on behalf of shareholders.
We don't need a faster 911. We need a more driver-focused 911.
The following 11 users liked this post by Wilder:
5thGen Texan (05-28-2024), Christopher G (05-28-2024), detansinn (05-28-2024), golftime (05-28-2024), InfiniteSmiles (05-29-2024), Mondo1 (05-28-2024), NewShockerGuy (05-29-2024), TheMurse (05-28-2024), VarTheVar (05-28-2024), Victory911 (05-28-2024), yronzff (05-29-2024) and 6 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 05-28-2024, 08:08 PM
  #60  
VarTheVar
Rennlist Member
 
VarTheVar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 752
Received 721 Likes on 335 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wilder
I just clocked 1,300 miles in a 1986 3.2 911 Carrera.
I drove from Germany to Belgium, then back to Germany, then Italy through Switzerland in twisty mountain passes.
I'm seriously considering replacing my 992 with an aircooled 911.
That car was the most FUN I've had driving in a long time and I also own a 7.2 GT3.
My thoughts on the 992.2 is that Porsche needs to stop being dragged into the idiotic HP race and use fun as the metric.
Fun = raw, light, manual, visceral, analog.
Sad to see Porsche transition from a bunch of passionate engineers to a bunch of pubco managers squeezing brand value on behalf of shareholders.
We don't need a faster 911. We need a more driver-focused 911.

I agree with the sentiment but the fact is that Porsche has always been a progressive company. If they had this tech back in the 60s they would have used it then too


Quick Reply: 992.2 World premiere



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:47 AM.