hybrid 911 speculation
This doesn't make any sense. The environmental impacts of EVs are largely positive except for the mining practices which will be sorted out eventually. So in your thought experiment you're take away a positive aspect of EVs for what reason? How does that provoke thought?
Forget emissions, its more energy efficient to burn fossil fuels in a power plant to charge an EV than it is to burn them locally to run an ICE.
Synthetic fuels are still gasoline. The advantage is only that they're carbon neutral but only if they're created with carbon neutral energy sources. They're still a hydrocarbon. The cost of synthetic fuels is still an unknown until they are produced at scale. Hydrogen may be the answer since the byproduct of combusting it is water. EVs break even with carbon output compared to ICE at around 10k miles of use and improve after that.
I don't know the impacts of mining for lithium vs extracting and refining crude oil, but as far as the vehicles themselves EVs are more environmentally friendly as of today in the long run. They are also quieter and smoother with less moving parts and less maintenance requirements.
That being said I've never driven an EV that I'd spend my own money on, which includes every Tesla ever made, the Nissan Leaf, and a Taycan. And that's not including me having to figure out the challenge of charging with day to day use which would be another detractor.
Well consider that fossil fuels are part of an open system. You pull them out of the ground, burn them, and then the products are released / stuck in the atmosphere.
With metals in batteries you have a closed system. Once you have them you can keep recycling/upcycling them in a closed loop.
With metals in batteries you have a closed system. Once you have them you can keep recycling/upcycling them in a closed loop.
I wonder why every single Porsche model is selling more than last year in US except for their EV Taycan which is down 10%, but Taycan sales are up 11% WW. I guess once incentives are no longer offered (as they went away for US buyers in 2023), people buy what they really want.
I wonder why every single Porsche model is selling more than last year in US except for their EV Taycan which is down 10%, but Taycan sales are up 11% WW. I guess once incentives are no longer offered (as they went away for US buyers in 2023), people buy what they really want.
Looking forward to Porsche having to slash the price of the next 911 because it’s all-wheel-drive, watercooled, not a mezger, PDK, electric steering, too big, hybrid.
*feel free to copy and paste this with the correct amendment each generation*
*feel free to copy and paste this with the correct amendment each generation*
Rennlist Member

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,237
Likes: 3,649
From: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Won't happen. Just like people bought the water cooled-996 they'll buy the Hybrid 911.
Was principally poking fun at the ridiculous statement that if you ignore one massive contributor to a systems emissions the system becomes okay. Not intending to present/represent that ICE is the answer.
Actually, Taycans had an early problem where the 12V battery would drain and die. And…(this is the best part)…as I recall, the issue only occurred when the car was plugged in.
This has since been fixed (it wasn’t an issue by the time I got my car in 21, so I’m only vaguely familiar with it). And it was, of course, an error on the Taycan and not an inherent flaw in EVs generally. Amusing none-the-less.
This has since been fixed (it wasn’t an issue by the time I got my car in 21, so I’m only vaguely familiar with it). And it was, of course, an error on the Taycan and not an inherent flaw in EVs generally. Amusing none-the-less.


