Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

hybrid 911 speculation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 02:16 AM
  #121  
Nein Eleven's Avatar
Nein Eleven
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 676
Likes: 615
From: CA
Default

This is what it must have been like at the Porsche meets when the water cooled engine rumors started circulating in the 90s.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 02:52 PM
  #122  
Oreos's Avatar
Oreos
Intermediate
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 47
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by VarTheVar
This doesn't make any sense. The environmental impacts of EVs are largely positive except for the mining practices which will be sorted out eventually. So in your thought experiment you're take away a positive aspect of EVs for what reason? How does that provoke thought?
ICE engines are "largely" better than EVs except for the day to day emissions which will be sorted out eventually (synthetic fuels, hydrogen).
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 03:45 PM
  #123  
Mike818's Avatar
Mike818
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 833
From: West Coast
Default

Originally Posted by Oreos
ICE engines are "largely" better than EVs except for the day to day emissions which will be sorted out eventually (synthetic fuels, hydrogen).
Anyone who knows much about this will recognize how false this statement is.

Forget emissions, its more energy efficient to burn fossil fuels in a power plant to charge an EV than it is to burn them locally to run an ICE.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 03:57 PM
  #124  
VarTheVar's Avatar
VarTheVar
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 998
Likes: 1,015
Default

Originally Posted by Oreos
ICE engines are "largely" better than EVs except for the day to day emissions which will be sorted out eventually (synthetic fuels, hydrogen).

Synthetic fuels are still gasoline. The advantage is only that they're carbon neutral but only if they're created with carbon neutral energy sources. They're still a hydrocarbon. The cost of synthetic fuels is still an unknown until they are produced at scale. Hydrogen may be the answer since the byproduct of combusting it is water. EVs break even with carbon output compared to ICE at around 10k miles of use and improve after that.

I don't know the impacts of mining for lithium vs extracting and refining crude oil, but as far as the vehicles themselves EVs are more environmentally friendly as of today in the long run. They are also quieter and smoother with less moving parts and less maintenance requirements.

That being said I've never driven an EV that I'd spend my own money on, which includes every Tesla ever made, the Nissan Leaf, and a Taycan. And that's not including me having to figure out the challenge of charging with day to day use which would be another detractor.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 04:09 PM
  #125  
Mike818's Avatar
Mike818
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 833
From: West Coast
Default

Well consider that fossil fuels are part of an open system. You pull them out of the ground, burn them, and then the products are released / stuck in the atmosphere.

With metals in batteries you have a closed system. Once you have them you can keep recycling/upcycling them in a closed loop.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 04:28 PM
  #126  
DodoBrd's Avatar
DodoBrd
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 1,663
Likes: 1,592
From: Frisco, TX
Default

I wonder why every single Porsche model is selling more than last year in US except for their EV Taycan which is down 10%, but Taycan sales are up 11% WW. I guess once incentives are no longer offered (as they went away for US buyers in 2023), people buy what they really want.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 04:42 PM
  #127  
Jockey's Avatar
Jockey
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 96
Likes: 160
From: Park City, UT
Default

Originally Posted by Oreos
ICE engines are "largely" better than EVs except for the day to day emissions which will be sorted out eventually (synthetic fuels, hydrogen).
ICE engines are highly inefficient
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 05:12 PM
  #128  
Wilder's Avatar
Wilder
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,158
Likes: 11,121
Default

Originally Posted by DodoBrd
I wonder why every single Porsche model is selling more than last year in US except for their EV Taycan which is down 10%, but Taycan sales are up 11% WW. I guess once incentives are no longer offered (as they went away for US buyers in 2023), people buy what they really want.
Sorry but this seems oversimplistic. People hoarding the last of ICE and manuals before they become extinct does not mean there is little or no appetite for EVs. Tesla has been nearly doubling sales every year since inception. Not defending EVs as I don't have a dog in that fight. Just adding context.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 05:19 PM
  #129  
Mike818's Avatar
Mike818
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 833
From: West Coast
Default

it's an incomplete picture anyway. Sales could be down because they simply couldn't ship as many for what ever reason.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 05:42 PM
  #130  
Haros's Avatar
Haros
Pro
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 568
Likes: 554
From: Vancouver
Default

Looking forward to Porsche having to slash the price of the next 911 because it’s all-wheel-drive, watercooled, not a mezger, PDK, electric steering​​​​​, too big, hybrid.



*feel free to copy and paste this with the correct amendment each generation*
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 06:45 PM
  #131  
aggie57's Avatar
aggie57
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,237
Likes: 3,649
From: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Haros
Looking forward to Porsche having to slash the price of the next 911 because it’s all-wheel-drive, watercooled, not a mezger, PDK, electric steering​​​​​, too big, hybrid.



*feel free to copy and paste this with the correct amendment each generation*
Won't happen. Just like people bought the water cooled-996 they'll buy the Hybrid 911.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 07:43 PM
  #132  
Oreos's Avatar
Oreos
Intermediate
 
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 47
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Mike818
Anyone who knows much about this will recognize how false this statement is.

Forget emissions, its more energy efficient to burn fossil fuels in a power plant to charge an EV than it is to burn them locally to run an ICE.
Shame batteries lose their power overnight though.

Was principally poking fun at the ridiculous statement that if you ignore one massive contributor to a systems emissions the system becomes okay. Not intending to present/represent that ICE is the answer.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 07:57 PM
  #133  
jhenson29's Avatar
jhenson29
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 1,591
From: St. Louis, MO
Default

Originally Posted by Oreos
Shame batteries lose their power overnight though.
Lol…what?
Any energy (batteries store energy, not power) loss over night is negligible.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 07:59 PM
  #134  
aggie57's Avatar
aggie57
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,237
Likes: 3,649
From: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by Oreos
Shame batteries lose their power overnight though.
You are right, 992's are notorious for doing this. EV's not so much.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2023 | 08:09 PM
  #135  
jhenson29's Avatar
jhenson29
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 1,591
From: St. Louis, MO
Default

Originally Posted by aggie57
You are right, 992's are notorious for doing this. EV's not so much.
Actually, Taycans had an early problem where the 12V battery would drain and die. And…(this is the best part)…as I recall, the issue only occurred when the car was plugged in.

This has since been fixed (it wasn’t an issue by the time I got my car in 21, so I’m only vaguely familiar with it). And it was, of course, an error on the Taycan and not an inherent flaw in EVs generally. Amusing none-the-less.
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:57 AM.