992 base 7mt Petition
#31
You know I have a 991.2 C2 and waiting on my 992 C2S manual. I really wanted to order another C2 MT, but of course had to order the C2S. I am wondering if you had a C2 before and how they compare? Or anybody else that just received their C2S MT - how do they compare? I know it’s faster, but more about turbo lag and driving dynamics.
#32
Did not own a 991.2 or .1- Never owned a turbo equipped car but have driven a couple- last car was a e90M3 V8 NA
and I do not experience any lag whatsoever. I would never know unless someone told me it was turbocharged.
The transmission is perfect.... the rev-match feature, for those of use who still have not perfected the rev-matched
downshift, makes corners much more enjoyable.... it is a blast!
and I do not experience any lag whatsoever. I would never know unless someone told me it was turbocharged.
The transmission is perfect.... the rev-match feature, for those of use who still have not perfected the rev-matched
downshift, makes corners much more enjoyable.... it is a blast!
The following users liked this post:
Dan Nagy (05-07-2020)
#33
You know I have a 991.2 C2 and waiting on my 992 C2S manual. I really wanted to order another C2 MT, but of course had to order the C2S. I am wondering if you had a C2 before and how they compare? Or anybody else that just received their C2S MT - how do they compare? I know it’s faster, but more about turbo lag and driving dynamics.
The following users liked this post:
Dan Nagy (05-07-2020)
#35
For me, a manual gearbox is a key component in the experience of a sports car. Get rid of it, and my interest in the car evaporates with very few exceptions (track cars are a separate thing). Any longings I had for new Ferraris disappeared 10-15 years ago, and I think it coincided with the end of the gated manual. I've driven several new Ferraris since then, and have been blown away by the engines, handling, turn-in, sounds, styling (in some cases), etc. The 458 and F12 are fabulous cars, and yet I have zero desire to own them as I did (and still do) with particular models from the 1960s through the mid-2000s. Don't even dream about it.
I suppose we should be thankful that there's a manual at all in modern 911s. There have been (and are) a number of legislative and financial decisions working against the manual transmission—and it wasn't so many years ago that a plan was afoot to make all 911s PDK (possibly with AWD), and you see shades of it in the 992: all are wide-body, and the base is (so far) PDK only. But I didn't put a lot of stock in that rumor, and still don't like putting stock in rumors. The lack of the 7MT in the base 992 Carrera might be something worth starting a petition over, imo. At worst, a group of enthusiasts let PCNA know their feelings—and we've seen PCNA respond to well-organized, respectful petitions/customer groups in surprisingly cool ways. At best, the 7MT will make a return as a no-cost option. Or the group will learn that it's being held as part of a "driver's model" based on the Carrera like the Carrera T.
The following users liked this post:
lapisblue (05-12-2020)
#36
I will only buy a 992 if l can get a base with a manual transmission. In 2018 l ordered a 718 and in 2019 l ordered a BMW M2 Competition [both manual] but what l really want is a 911. The 992 just has gotten too expensive for the normal person to buy so the manual is to save money as well.
RET
RET
#37
I will only buy a 992 if l can get a base with a manual transmission. In 2018 l ordered a 718 and in 2019 l ordered a BMW M2 Competition [both manual] but what l really want is a 911. The 992 just has gotten too expensive for the normal person to buy so the manual is to save money as well.
RET
RET
#38
I'm not going to hold my breath, but given the plethora of options Porsche offers for these cars it would make sense (other than for CAFE numbers) to offer some performance-type options on the Base Carrera 992. Since the C2 is standard with the higher profile 19/20 inch wheels (but can be ordered with 20/21) it would be great to be able to order the lowered Sport PASM and the 7MT with a LSD. I'm going to guess that most guys who want a 7MT would also like Sport PASM and a LSD (okay, PTV and mechanical LSD). I realize that such a model would be the 991.2 911T in a significantly wider body. The argument for such a model is that the take rate would likely be small enough to have minimal impact on the overall CAFE rating; however, that small take rate argues against providing it in the first place. Probably the only way to have any chance to accomplish what we want would be to have enough people petition PCNA to really get their attention.
Somebody correct me, because I cannot recall the pricing on the 991.2 C2 Base vs. C2T vs. C2S, but I thought the C2T had to some degree copied the GTS package/value concept over the C2S. That would mean both the C2T and GTS appealed to people who wanted particular options grouped together in a reduced cost package.
The main reason I am leaning toward a C2 Base Carrera in the first place is that I keep hearing guys saying that the Base 3.0L twin turbo motor has noticeably less turbo lag than the S motor. And, taking this one more step, does the 3.0L twin turbo motor in the 991.2 GTS have even more lag? The only 991.2 I have ever driven was a Base C2 with PDK, so I'm unfortunately in a position of complete ignorance. Then, to make me even more confused, I've read reliable sources who say that the new 992.1 3.8L Turbo and Turbo S motors are newly based on the 9A2 motor family, and that the turbochargers are located and configured (they each spin in the opposite direction) to yield much quicker spin-up and therefore less turbo lag. If the turbo opposite spin is now used on the 3.8L 9A2-based motor, is it now, or will it likely at some point, be used in the 9A2 3.0L Carrera motors?
I really hope that all of us in this section of the Porsche audience are not just making a lot of noise signifying nothing. Porsche, like nearly all for-profit enterprises, tends to design product differentiation to move consumers toward more expensive models.
Somebody correct me, because I cannot recall the pricing on the 991.2 C2 Base vs. C2T vs. C2S, but I thought the C2T had to some degree copied the GTS package/value concept over the C2S. That would mean both the C2T and GTS appealed to people who wanted particular options grouped together in a reduced cost package.
The main reason I am leaning toward a C2 Base Carrera in the first place is that I keep hearing guys saying that the Base 3.0L twin turbo motor has noticeably less turbo lag than the S motor. And, taking this one more step, does the 3.0L twin turbo motor in the 991.2 GTS have even more lag? The only 991.2 I have ever driven was a Base C2 with PDK, so I'm unfortunately in a position of complete ignorance. Then, to make me even more confused, I've read reliable sources who say that the new 992.1 3.8L Turbo and Turbo S motors are newly based on the 9A2 motor family, and that the turbochargers are located and configured (they each spin in the opposite direction) to yield much quicker spin-up and therefore less turbo lag. If the turbo opposite spin is now used on the 3.8L 9A2-based motor, is it now, or will it likely at some point, be used in the 9A2 3.0L Carrera motors?
I really hope that all of us in this section of the Porsche audience are not just making a lot of noise signifying nothing. Porsche, like nearly all for-profit enterprises, tends to design product differentiation to move consumers toward more expensive models.
The following users liked this post:
SantaFePorsche (05-08-2020)
#40
I'm not going to hold my breath, but given the plethora of options Porsche offers for these cars it would make sense (other than for CAFE numbers) to offer some performance-type options on the Base Carrera 992. Since the C2 is standard with the higher profile 19/20 inch wheels (but can be ordered with 20/21) it would be great to be able to order the lowered Sport PASM and the 7MT with a LSD. I'm going to guess that most guys who want a 7MT would also like Sport PASM and a LSD (okay, PTV and mechanical LSD). I realize that such a model would be the 991.2 911T in a significantly wider body. The argument for such a model is that the take rate would likely be small enough to have minimal impact on the overall CAFE rating; however, that small take rate argues against providing it in the first place. Probably the only way to have any chance to accomplish what we want would be to have enough people petition PCNA to really get their attention.
Somebody correct me, because I cannot recall the pricing on the 991.2 C2 Base vs. C2T vs. C2S, but I thought the C2T had to some degree copied the GTS package/value concept over the C2S. That would mean both the C2T and GTS appealed to people who wanted particular options grouped together in a reduced cost package.
The main reason I am leaning toward a C2 Base Carrera in the first place is that I keep hearing guys saying that the Base 3.0L twin turbo motor has noticeably less turbo lag than the S motor. And, taking this one more step, does the 3.0L twin turbo motor in the 991.2 GTS have even more lag? The only 991.2 I have ever driven was a Base C2 with PDK, so I'm unfortunately in a position of complete ignorance. Then, to make me even more confused, I've read reliable sources who say that the new 992.1 3.8L Turbo and Turbo S motors are newly based on the 9A2 motor family, and that the turbochargers are located and configured (they each spin in the opposite direction) to yield much quicker spin-up and therefore less turbo lag. If the turbo opposite spin is now used on the 3.8L 9A2-based motor, is it now, or will it likely at some point, be used in the 9A2 3.0L Carrera motors?
I really hope that all of us in this section of the Porsche audience are not just making a lot of noise signifying nothing. Porsche, like nearly all for-profit enterprises, tends to design product differentiation to move consumers toward more expensive models.
Somebody correct me, because I cannot recall the pricing on the 991.2 C2 Base vs. C2T vs. C2S, but I thought the C2T had to some degree copied the GTS package/value concept over the C2S. That would mean both the C2T and GTS appealed to people who wanted particular options grouped together in a reduced cost package.
The main reason I am leaning toward a C2 Base Carrera in the first place is that I keep hearing guys saying that the Base 3.0L twin turbo motor has noticeably less turbo lag than the S motor. And, taking this one more step, does the 3.0L twin turbo motor in the 991.2 GTS have even more lag? The only 991.2 I have ever driven was a Base C2 with PDK, so I'm unfortunately in a position of complete ignorance. Then, to make me even more confused, I've read reliable sources who say that the new 992.1 3.8L Turbo and Turbo S motors are newly based on the 9A2 motor family, and that the turbochargers are located and configured (they each spin in the opposite direction) to yield much quicker spin-up and therefore less turbo lag. If the turbo opposite spin is now used on the 3.8L 9A2-based motor, is it now, or will it likely at some point, be used in the 9A2 3.0L Carrera motors?
I really hope that all of us in this section of the Porsche audience are not just making a lot of noise signifying nothing. Porsche, like nearly all for-profit enterprises, tends to design product differentiation to move consumers toward more expensive models.
The following users liked this post:
stevensivak (05-07-2020)
#41
For me, a manual gearbox is a key component in the experience of a sports car. Get rid of it, and my interest in the car evaporates with very few exceptions (track cars are a separate thing). Any longings I had for new Ferraris disappeared 10-15 years ago, and I think it coincided with the end of the gated manual. I've driven several new Ferraris since then, and have been blown away by the engines, handling, turn-in, sounds, styling (in some cases), etc. The 458 and F12 are fabulous cars, and yet I have zero desire to own them as I did (and still do) with particular models from the 1960s through the mid-2000s. Don't even dream about it.
I suppose we should be thankful that there's a manual at all in modern 911s....The lack of the 7MT in the base 992 Carrera might be something worth starting a petition over, imo. At worst, a group of enthusiasts let PCNA know their feelings—and we've seen PCNA respond to well-organized, respectful petitions/customer groups in surprisingly cool ways. At best, the 7MT will make a return as a no-cost option. Or the group will learn that it's being held as part of a "driver's model" based on the Carrera like the Carrera T.
I suppose we should be thankful that there's a manual at all in modern 911s....The lack of the 7MT in the base 992 Carrera might be something worth starting a petition over, imo. At worst, a group of enthusiasts let PCNA know their feelings—and we've seen PCNA respond to well-organized, respectful petitions/customer groups in surprisingly cool ways. At best, the 7MT will make a return as a no-cost option. Or the group will learn that it's being held as part of a "driver's model" based on the Carrera like the Carrera T.
Some of us think the motor in the base 991.2 C2 provides a little more "naturally aspirated experience" than the motor in the 991.2 C2S. That said, the 991.2 C2S (which I have driven several times in PDK form) is a wonderful car. No doubt about it.
God bless,
TT
Last edited by TomTarzian; 05-07-2020 at 11:03 PM.
The following users liked this post:
smiles11 (05-07-2020)
#42
I'm not quite ready to buy a 992 yet, partly because so far I can't make a final decision on which model. My wants (as opposed to needs) have gradually changed over the past five years. I bought a '15 991.1 GTS and did enough modifications to make it a good track car (DE events, no actual racing) but still be an enjoyable road car.I had planned to keep the '15 for a long time, until I found out my insurance company decided to exclude driver ed track coverage. Event based track insurance was too expensive for me to tolerate, so I sold it and went to a much less expensive track focused '02 Boxster S. I've now realized that while I still feel safe on road circuits I'm approaching the point (age!) where I will have to make the decision to stop. Therefore, I sold the track car early this year and plan to use my daily driver '18 VW Golf R for track events. As most of you probably know, the Golf R has a 2.0L single turbo motor with about 290hp/280tq in stock form. It's a lot of fun on roads, but I have yet to drive it on a track. It also has some turbo lag issues from that single turbo, which I've had to learn to drive around.
Since any 992 I buy will be primarily a road car, with at most only an occasional track day, I'd really like to at least consider the 7MT. For the road I also cannot see the need for the performance of either the 992 S or GTS. So, the ideal model for me could be a Base C2, especially if I could get one with Sport Chrono, PTV/LSD, Sport PASM, and the 7MT. In my dreams only, probably. Oh well, this is all about wants, not needs.
#43
Be patient, though, I doubt we will see it before the 2022 M/Y, if not 2023.
#44
like i said before i don't think its turbo lag.. once you floor the car it takes a second then goes but its not like turbo lag.. turbo lag you feel the power increasing slowly then it pushes you back in your seat .. this feels like a electronic delay
#45