Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why doesn't Porsche make a smaller 911?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2020, 09:24 AM
  #61  
Penn4S
Rennlist Member
 
Penn4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,732
Received 1,330 Likes on 750 Posts
Default

They already build one it’s called a Cayman or in cab version a Boxster. Both very capable canyon carvers and great driving cars. If it must be a 6cyl go to the GT4. Porsche will never put a watered down version of the 911 at 300-350 hp in between the 911 and Cayman. It would not make financial sense in a line up that already has more than enough variations.
If you want a more raw version it’s GT3 is you want a more compact version it’s the Cayman.
The following 2 users liked this post by Penn4S:
AlexCeres (10-30-2020), ldamelio (11-03-2020)
Old 10-30-2020, 02:35 PM
  #62  
fstezaws
Advanced
 
fstezaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: AZ
Posts: 95
Received 50 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Porsche (and any major manufacturer at this point) designs, makes, and sells what people WANT. Their market research and data is infinitely greater than anyone's opinions here on what will or will not sell.

Could they make a couple thousand models of a specific type? Yes. Will it sell? Probably...scarcity of a unique model will always sell for any brand that has several thousand loyalists in it's rolodex. Just because you can, doesn't mean you should though, and Porsche is smart.

Keeping brutally sharp focus on the most important thing that drives the purpose of the company comes with sacrifices. Steve Jobs once said that he was more proud of what Apple DID NOT make, than the few things they did make.

Focus, simplicity, economies of scale, and following the greatest return for the least effort is what drives the 911 to evolve over time. You can't please everyone, but Porsche is clearly very intentional in its choices.
The following users liked this post:
macanspnw (10-30-2020)
Old 10-30-2020, 03:17 PM
  #63  
bmclaurin
Instructor
 
bmclaurin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 159
Received 222 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

I know it's not rear-engine, but IMHO the Mazda MX-5 Club w/ MT checks a *lot*of those boxes. The relatively new ND2 update with its (slightly) increased power is very tempting to me as a fun little weekend car. Not to mention its good looks, reliability, build quality, etc. Plus it has a 30-year heritage and IMO has earned its spot as a true sports car icon.
The following 2 users liked this post by bmclaurin:
Bluehighways (10-30-2020), LnC993 (10-30-2020)
Old 10-30-2020, 03:42 PM
  #64  
Bluehighways
Rennlist Member
 
Bluehighways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Orange County California
Posts: 2,798
Received 2,647 Likes on 1,246 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmclaurin
I know it's not rear-engine, but IMHO the Mazda MX-5 Club w/ MT checks a *lot*of those boxes. The relatively new ND2 update with its (slightly) increased power is very tempting to me as a fun little weekend car. Not to mention its good looks, reliability, build quality, etc. Plus it has a 30-year heritage and IMO has earned its spot as a true sports car icon.
I'd have to agree. The Miata really does a good job of filling the 356/912 market slot IMHO.
Old 10-30-2020, 04:15 PM
  #65  
Gentian21
Racer
 
Gentian21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 327
Received 217 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

I think the 718 is underrated on this board. My wife has a 718 Boxster, and it is a hoot to drive. Like all mid-engine Porsches, in steers and handles beautifully-- better than practically anything else on the road save for a 911. Sure, the noise from the four cylinder is less pleasing than the old six, and if that's the most important thing, then forget the 718. But what car under $75,000 delivers this much enjoyment, or mirrors the older, smaller, less powerful 911's better?
The following 2 users liked this post by Gentian21:
AlexCeres (10-31-2020), Asker509 (11-03-2020)
Old 10-30-2020, 05:03 PM
  #66  
Dan Nagy
Rennlist Member
 
Dan Nagy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: The Beach
Posts: 4,509
Received 2,218 Likes on 1,117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OwingsMills
I think the 718 is underrated on this board. My wife has a 718 Boxster, and it is a hoot to drive. Like all mid-engine Porsches, in steers and handles beautifully-- better than practically anything else on the road save for a 911. Sure, the noise from the four cylinder is less pleasing than the old six, and if that's the most important thing, then forget the 718. But what car under $75,000 delivers this much enjoyment, or mirrors the older, smaller, less powerful 911's better?
Or the Cayman/Boxster 4.0. If that had been available when I ordered my 992 It might have changed my direction....
The following users liked this post:
Master Deep (10-31-2020)
Old 10-31-2020, 12:57 AM
  #67  
AlexCeres
Rennlist Member
 
AlexCeres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 2,849
Received 1,662 Likes on 1,019 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OwingsMills
I think the 718 is underrated on this board. My wife has a 718 Boxster, and it is a hoot to drive. Like all mid-engine Porsches, in steers and handles beautifully-- better than practically anything else on the road save for a 911. Sure, the noise from the four cylinder is less pleasing than the old six, and if that's the most important thing, then forget the 718. But what car under $75,000 delivers this much enjoyment, or mirrors the older, smaller, less powerful 911's better?
the gts 4.0 is quite phenomenal. And the gt4 is a ton of fun. If you want an older smaller 911, these are excellent alternatives to just buying a 20 yro 911
Old 10-31-2020, 03:32 AM
  #68  
aircooledpurist
Pro
 
aircooledpurist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 697
Received 220 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

The new 992 is a fabulous car. Very fast, very capable, very much a status symbol. If you have 150 or 200k to spend, there are a lot of new cars out there today that are very fast, very capable and are very much a status symbol.

Unfortunately, when Porsche stopped making hand built cars, who's doors closed with an unmistakable thunk and who's air cooled engines sounded like no other, who's steering was telepathic and who's character and charisma was undeniable.... modern Porsche cars stopped having a *soul*. The new cars accelerate and brake brilliantly, all the electronic wizardry masks the size and weight reasonably well. The stereo even pipes engine noise into the cabin.

Starting with the 996, every 'new' 911 has been Porsche number next. As soon as the next latest and greatest is released, the previous models just fade away, save for the most expensive examples. Why is this? Because the new cars have no soul.

The 993 is a very nice example because it is the most modern of the air cooled era. Properly specified and properly sorted, they are a perfect blend of analog and raw while not feeling at all like an antique. These cars exude character and possess a specialness that the modern cars can not begin to match. Nothing matches the drive of an air cooled 911.

That certainly does not mean the older vintage cars replace the new, modern, more technically advanced cars. The old cars certainly are not a substitute for that modern everyday driver. However, if you can afford a new 911, you can certainly find a nice example of an older air cooled car, pay the 15 or 20 grand to get it sorted and properly modded, and experience that smaller, lighter Porsche. You know, the ones that talk to you like your new, fast, expensive car never will.

I must say this post is not in any way a knock on the new cars. Things have just changed over the years.

Last edited by aircooledpurist; 10-31-2020 at 03:36 AM.
Old 10-31-2020, 05:08 AM
  #69  
Jim Wilke
Racer
 
Jim Wilke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 233 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

How 'bout that Sony Trinitron? What a picture!
The following 2 users liked this post by Jim Wilke:
detansinn (10-31-2020), SFernando (11-01-2020)
Old 10-31-2020, 08:07 AM
  #70  
ldamelio
Rennlist Member
 
ldamelio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 1,427
Received 957 Likes on 517 Posts
Default

I agree with those who have said that the 718 is what OP is asking for. To be specific, the GTS 4.0 models are exactly what he describes (with the exception of the arguably superior mid-engine layout). Tossable, naturally aspirated, smaller. About as pure a sports car as one can buy in 2020. Buy one and put a heavy suitcase in the trunk if you want a small 911. The extra 15 hp over a base 911 will be more than enough to compensate for that.

Last edited by ldamelio; 10-31-2020 at 08:14 AM.
Old 10-31-2020, 08:28 AM
  #71  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,145
Received 6,465 Likes on 2,813 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aircooledpurist
The new 992 is a fabulous car. Very fast, very capable, very much a status symbol. If you have 150 or 200k to spend, there are a lot of new cars out there today that are very fast, very capable and are very much a status symbol.

Unfortunately, when Porsche stopped making hand built cars, who's doors closed with an unmistakable thunk and who's air cooled engines sounded like no other, who's steering was telepathic and who's character and charisma was undeniable.... modern Porsche cars stopped having a *soul*. The new cars accelerate and brake brilliantly, all the electronic wizardry masks the size and weight reasonably well. The stereo even pipes engine noise into the cabin.

Starting with the 996, every 'new' 911 has been Porsche number next. As soon as the next latest and greatest is released, the previous models just fade away, save for the most expensive examples. Why is this? Because the new cars have no soul.

The 993 is a very nice example because it is the most modern of the air cooled era. Properly specified and properly sorted, they are a perfect blend of analog and raw while not feeling at all like an antique. These cars exude character and possess a specialness that the modern cars can not begin to match. Nothing matches the drive of an air cooled 911.

That certainly does not mean the older vintage cars replace the new, modern, more technically advanced cars. The old cars certainly are not a substitute for that modern everyday driver. However, if you can afford a new 911, you can certainly find a nice example of an older air cooled car, pay the 15 or 20 grand to get it sorted and properly modded, and experience that smaller, lighter Porsche. You know, the ones that talk to you like your new, fast, expensive car never will.

I must say this post is not in any way a knock on the new cars. Things have just changed over the years.

Not going to disagree on the virtues of a classic Porsche. All of it is true. But owning an air cooled car is a serious commitment and a much different proposition than owning a modern water cooled car with a warranty that any basic Porsche dealer can service. In my opinion, you need to be mechanically savvy and have access to a top tier air cooled specialist and the capacity to spend exorbitant amounts of money if needed.

I love mine and will never sell it. But it's definitely not for everyone.
The following 2 users liked this post by rk-d:
Dan Nagy (10-31-2020), detansinn (10-31-2020)
Old 10-31-2020, 08:32 AM
  #72  
detansinn
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
detansinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 5,655
Received 8,099 Likes on 2,995 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aircooledpurist
The new 992 is a fabulous car. Very fast, very capable, very much a status symbol. If you have 150 or 200k to spend, there are a lot of new cars out there today that are very fast, very capable and are very much a status symbol.

Unfortunately, when Porsche stopped making hand built cars, who's doors closed with an unmistakable thunk and who's air cooled engines sounded like no other, who's steering was telepathic and who's character and charisma was undeniable.... modern Porsche cars stopped having a *soul*. The new cars accelerate and brake brilliantly, all the electronic wizardry masks the size and weight reasonably well. The stereo even pipes engine noise into the cabin.

Starting with the 996, every 'new' 911 has been Porsche number next. As soon as the next latest and greatest is released, the previous models just fade away, save for the most expensive examples. Why is this? Because the new cars have no soul.

The 993 is a very nice example because it is the most modern of the air cooled era. Properly specified and properly sorted, they are a perfect blend of analog and raw while not feeling at all like an antique. These cars exude character and possess a specialness that the modern cars can not begin to match. Nothing matches the drive of an air cooled 911.

That certainly does not mean the older vintage cars replace the new, modern, more technically advanced cars. The old cars certainly are not a substitute for that modern everyday driver. However, if you can afford a new 911, you can certainly find a nice example of an older air cooled car, pay the 15 or 20 grand to get it sorted and properly modded, and experience that smaller, lighter Porsche. You know, the ones that talk to you like your new, fast, expensive car never will.

I must say this post is not in any way a knock on the new cars. Things have just changed over the years.
A 993 is only about 10% lighter than the equivalent 992. 911s were never “lightweight” cars.

Having experienced a lot of 911 generations, I don’t subscribe to the “new cars don’t have soul” nonsense. Of course, you’re also making a number of incorrect assertions. For example, the stereo isn’t responsible for engine noise in a modern 911 — it’s not a BMW.

“...not in any way knock on the new cars”, yet, that was your entire post. The holier than thou posture of some air cooled enthusiasts is some of the most laughable bull**** of Porsche culture.

I love every generation of the 911 and every generation improved on the prior generation, even the 996, which manages to be LIGHTER than the 993. Having experienced them all, the heritage and legacy is amazing, they all manage to feel like 911s.

Last edited by detansinn; 10-31-2020 at 08:36 AM.
The following 7 users liked this post by detansinn:
aggie57 (11-03-2020), AlexCeres (11-01-2020), Dan Nagy (10-31-2020), gcurnew (10-31-2020), Guaji (11-03-2020), SamD (11-01-2020), smiles11 (10-31-2020) and 2 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 10-31-2020, 12:14 PM
  #73  
aircooledpurist
Pro
 
aircooledpurist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 697
Received 220 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by detansinn
A 993 is only about 10% lighter than the equivalent 992. 911s were never “lightweight” cars.

Having experienced a lot of 911 generations, I don’t subscribe to the “new cars don’t have soul” nonsense. Of course, you’re also making a number of incorrect assertions. For example, the stereo isn’t responsible for engine noise in a modern 911 — it’s not a BMW.

“...not in any way knock on the new cars”, yet, that was your entire post. The holier than thou posture of some air cooled enthusiasts is some of the most laughable bull**** of Porsche culture.

I love every generation of the 911 and every generation improved on the prior generation, even the 996, which manages to be LIGHTER than the 993. Having experienced them all, the heritage and legacy is amazing, they all manage to feel like 911s.

I'm really NOT knocking the newer cars. I happen to daily drive BMW's because they are, for my needs more practical than a new 911. My M3's, while wickedly fast and very capable, are digital appliances. I also have plenty of seat time in newer 911's and while they are awesome, they have become like any other (high end) car. When I get in my 993, there is no denying I am in an old school Porsche..... made at a time when engineering came first and cost didn't matter. If they stayed on that path they would have gone out of business. The truth is, when they started listening to the accountants, the cars have never been the same.

I don't think the 993 is the holy grail. I just think they are more special than the new cars will ever be. There is a reason they are trying to duplicate the 5 gauges with the analog tach and the digital rest of the dash. The 993's (and all the air cooled cars) have stood the test of time. Do you think in 2045 folks will be lusting over the 2021 992? I will reserve my thoughts.

Last edited by aircooledpurist; 10-31-2020 at 12:24 PM.
Old 10-31-2020, 12:28 PM
  #74  
smiles11
Rennlist Member
 
smiles11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,487
Received 3,378 Likes on 1,479 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aircooledpurist
I'm really NOT knocking the newer cars. I happen to daily drive BMW's because they are, for my needs more practical than a new 911. My M3's, while wickedly fast and very capable, are digital appliances. I also have plenty of seat time in newer 911's and while they are awesome, they have become like any other (high end) car. When I get in my 993, there is no denying I am in an old school Porsche..... made at a time when engineering came first and cost didn't matter. If they stayed on that path they would have gone out of business. The truth is, when they started listening to the accountants, the cars have never been the same.

I don't think the 993 is the holy grail. I just think they are more special than the new cars will ever be. There is a reason they are trying to duplicate the 5 gauges with the analog tach and the digital rest of the dash. The 993's (and all the air cooled cars) have stood the test of time. Do you think in 2045 folks will be lusting over the 2021 992? I will reserve my thoughts.
964 is the holy grail

and yes... I’d gladly lust over a 992 as everything in 2045 will likely be fully electric.
Old 10-31-2020, 12:43 PM
  #75  
rk-d
Rennlist Member
 
rk-d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 8,145
Received 6,465 Likes on 2,813 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smiles11
964 is the holy grail

and yes... I’d gladly lust over a 992 as everything in 2045 will likely be fully electric.
Fightin words.


The following 2 users liked this post by rk-d:
detansinn (10-31-2020), smiles11 (10-31-2020)


Quick Reply: Why doesn't Porsche make a smaller 911?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:42 AM.