992 needs RAS or not?
#46
Burning Brakes
#47
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Newport Beach, CA and Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,379
Received 2,906 Likes
on
1,534 Posts
#48
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I stand by my assertion that Sport Chrono is the only option that you actually need. It's hard to sell a used 911 without it.
#49
Since a car without SC doesn't have sport+ and individual mode, the two buttons still offer everything with one click, which is as simple as turning one click. It's a matter of taste nonetheless. Yet it's still a sportscar and resale value doesn't make a car faster or more fun to drive. If I had to make the choice between SC and RAS, I'd always take the rear axle steering. It's a much bigger gain in driving experience and performance than SC. You don't just get two actuators in the rear. Steering rack up front is also quicker, front axle setup is changed as the added stability in the rear allows for a different toe change over kinematics/wheel travel up front. Vehicle response is dramatically different, yet not even remotely synthetic (at least in the Porsches sports cars). Thus this is were I put my money.
#50
Burning Brakes
You know what really needs RAS...
My Chevy Silverado 😋
My Chevy Silverado 😋
Last edited by jkautz; 11-17-2019 at 12:47 AM.
The following 5 users liked this post by jkautz:
aggie57 (11-16-2019),
detansinn (11-16-2019),
markchristenson (11-17-2019),
Multimodal (02-09-2023),
Osv (11-17-2019)
#51
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Since a car without SC doesn't have sport+ and individual mode, the two buttons still offer everything with one click, which is as simple as turning one click. It's a matter of taste nonetheless. Yet it's still a sportscar and resale value doesn't make a car faster or more fun to drive. If I had to make the choice between SC and RAS, I'd always take the rear axle steering. It's a much bigger gain in driving experience and performance than SC. You don't just get two actuators in the rear. Steering rack up front is also quicker, front axle setup is changed as the added stability in the rear allows for a different toe change over kinematics/wheel travel up front. Vehicle response is dramatically different, yet not even remotely synthetic (at least in the Porsches sports cars). Thus this is were I put my money.
As I have posted above, I fully dig RAS and for the folks that want it, great. It does change the driving dynamics -- and not everyone wants those changes. That's why Porsche still makes it an option on most models.
I don't understand why anyone would configure RAS and NOT Sport Chrono. That doesn't make a lick of sense to me. Obviously, it's your money and your decision, but it's an odd choice to delete if you're budgeting options. Hey, this is how Porsche doesn't produce more than two 911s a year configured exactly the same. Whatever floats your boat. :P
#52
Rennlist Member
They used to offer it. Didn't sell. Too bad because it was awesome. Tight turning radius in parking lots and at highways speeds the rear wheels were "in phase" with the fronts so they acted like the front wheels of the trailer if you were towing. Couldn't even tell the trailer was there! too bad people are cheap-asses.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrasteer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrasteer
The following users liked this post:
jkautz (11-17-2019)
#54
RAS is now essential option for me having driven a 991.2 without it the difference is remarkable. Your also less likely to inadvertently kerb your alloys!