Notices
992 Turbo and Turbo S 2019-Current
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Porsche San Francisco

911 TTS vs DB12

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2024, 05:30 PM
  #1  
harrish1985
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
harrish1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 73
Received 43 Likes on 14 Posts
Default 911 TTS vs DB12

My daily is my 911 TTS. It’s the perfect balance of power, handling, comfort, ergonomics and creature comforts. Above all, it’s super reliable and really allows you to fly under the radar. Resale in general is also very good.

Being a car enthusiast of course I wanted to see and drive the new DB12. I have no issue stating that it’s beautiful both inside and out. That is where my appreciation stopped. I drove the car for about 20 minutes and felt very uninspired.

For one, it’s BIG and you notice the size. The exhaust note is blah, the 911 TTS with PSE isn’t much better. And the car just felt very uninspiring and underwhelming. I felt as if I was almost driving an SUV. I floored it a few times and while it’s quick it doesn’t have the linear power band of the 911. Just felt very torquey and then lost steam. I didn’t get much of a chance to toss it around but I sensed that it would be floaty. The 911 seems so connected to the road and I feel like an F1 driver when I’m going around twisties.

For anyone even contemplating the DB12 coming out of a 911 please heed this word of advice. DON’T. I felt at peace and smiled when I got back in 911 and started it up. There really is no substitute to the 911. I fully understand now why the dealer had preowned models sitting for 1/3rd of the price of what they were new. It’s a no brainer why the 911s hold as much as value as they do.
The following 2 users liked this post by harrish1985:
nikanarani (02-22-2024), RJR88 (02-22-2024)
Old 02-22-2024, 10:09 PM
  #2  
shrimp money
Race Car
 
shrimp money's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,217
Received 4,867 Likes on 1,970 Posts
Default

It’s way faster though.



At depreciation 😁
The following 5 users liked this post by shrimp money:
alexb930 (02-25-2024), eclou (02-22-2024), Highline-Autos.com (02-26-2024), iso87 (02-23-2024), NEH51 (02-23-2024)
Old 02-22-2024, 10:12 PM
  #3  
harrish1985
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
harrish1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 73
Received 43 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shrimp money
It’s way faster though.



At depreciation 😁
Exactly!!

4 year old DB11s with 1500 miles going for less than half MSRP…
The following users liked this post:
iso87 (02-23-2024)
Old 02-23-2024, 01:01 AM
  #4  
neil.schneider
Drifting
 
neil.schneider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Jersey(outside Phila)
Posts: 2,105
Received 402 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

Haha. That’s funny about the depreciation.
Old 02-23-2024, 07:43 AM
  #5  
jlee504
Rennlist Member
 
jlee504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 2,695
Received 416 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

I thought the new vantage was meant to be a direct competitor?

while the depreciation does suck and has kept me away, I drove the last gen vantage and I thought it was a hoot. More fun than my 991 TTS.
Old 02-23-2024, 10:24 AM
  #6  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,686
Likes: 0
Received 11,289 Likes on 4,974 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlee504
I thought the new vantage was meant to be a direct competitor?

while the depreciation does suck and has kept me away, I drove the last gen vantage and I thought it was a hoot. More fun than my 991 TTS.
It is, but we're talking about the DB12, which is probably more luxo-GT cruiser than sports coupe (like the Vantage).
Old 02-23-2024, 04:20 PM
  #7  
neil.schneider
Drifting
 
neil.schneider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Jersey(outside Phila)
Posts: 2,105
Received 402 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

Isn't the last gen Vantage just a dumbed down version of the MB GTS?
Old 02-24-2024, 08:05 AM
  #8  
jlee504
Rennlist Member
 
jlee504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 2,695
Received 416 Likes on 239 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neil.schneider
Isn't the last gen Vantage just a dumbed down version of the MB GTS?
while I hated the interior I thought it drove a lot better, the length of the hood isn't an issue on the vantage you could feel it on the GTS and the vantage danced around, it was a lot of fun. the gts felt a lot heavier and rigid.

I'm tempted by the new one, love the interior finally..TTS power with RWD only has got to be a ton of fun

just hate the depreciation curve on them.
Old 02-24-2024, 08:42 PM
  #9  
3-Pedals
Rennlist Member
 
3-Pedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,710
Received 1,602 Likes on 892 Posts
Default

How does it compare to 812/F12?
Old 02-25-2024, 05:47 PM
  #10  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,686
Likes: 0
Received 11,289 Likes on 4,974 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3-Pedals
How does it compare to 812/F12?
It doesn't.
Old 02-25-2024, 06:10 PM
  #11  
3-Pedals
Rennlist Member
 
3-Pedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,710
Received 1,602 Likes on 892 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
It doesn't.
how so
Old 02-25-2024, 06:17 PM
  #12  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,686
Likes: 0
Received 11,289 Likes on 4,974 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3-Pedals
how so
V8 v. V12
FI v. NA
812 is also double the price of the DB12 (the F12 is probably on parity, but it's also 3-4 years older than a new DB12)
Old 02-25-2024, 06:31 PM
  #13  
3-Pedals
Rennlist Member
 
3-Pedals's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,710
Received 1,602 Likes on 892 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
V8 v. V12
FI v. NA
812 is also double the price of the DB12 (the F12 is probably on parity, but it's also 3-4 years older than a new DB12)
Ok, I know all of that but both are front engine, long hood, wide, heavy, GT cars. I meant to say in terms of driving dynamics how the two compares.

By that train of thought, we shouldnt compare any ferrari to porsche including 488 Pista to GT3RS. Pista also costed more than twice the cost of 991.2 GT3RS when it came out.
Old 02-26-2024, 12:45 AM
  #14  
neil.schneider
Drifting
 
neil.schneider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Jersey(outside Phila)
Posts: 2,105
Received 402 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

I had a chance to drive the GTS back when I bought my 2015 turbo S. It was not the car for me. I did not like the way it felt. I did not like the high belt line. I did not like the inability to see the road in front of me.
I know it was reviewed as a great vehicle and I’m sure it was. It just wasn’t for me. It may have been because I was coming from another 911 and I just wasn’t used to it.
I never had a chance to drive the vantage.
Before I got my current car, I did consider just keeping my last turbo S and adding a vantage. But every time I thought about it, I thought back to when I drove the GTS and didn’t really like it.
Old 02-26-2024, 07:58 PM
  #15  
bmcginn
Advanced
 
bmcginn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Jupiter, Florida
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

My wife and I have owned several Aston Martins (in fact she currently drives a DBX) and several Porsches. We were excited about the DB12 because we loved the reviews and thought it looked great in the photos. We both had a chance to drive it and I’d describe our reaction as ‘meh’. My wife drove it first and when she got out of the car I asked what she thought and all she said was ‘it’s nice’…which I thought was a little odd because she loves Aston Martins. But then I drove it and she’s right, it’s nice, and strangely it looks better in photos than it does in the flesh. After our drive we sat down with our salesperson to build one and it came in at $285,000, which we’d happily pay, but not for a car that’s just ‘nice’.
The following users liked this post:
cavemanmoore (02-27-2024)


Quick Reply: 911 TTS vs DB12



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:50 AM.