Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.2 GTS'es are coming as 2017 MY, 3.0L tt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2016, 04:39 PM
  #151  
GTS1
Advanced
 
GTS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 63
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Historically , it has always been the case that Porsche only utilized turbo motors in 911's for the Carrera Turbo and Turbo S and a few specialty derivatives, GT2/GT2RS, since really originating the distinction of the turbo approach through the 930 Carrera Turbo. And have been masterful at providing an absolutely distinctive model for decades. Through the years, this gave the Carrera Turbo models their special character amidst the other models in the range . So , regardless of how the brand and marketing execs want to spin it and promote the new turbo motor 911's, to me it is a shame and just another example of the current trend of diminishing 911 aura and character seemingly brought about by the need to meet emissions standards? I guess no one at Porsche could figure out an alternative approach?
Old 10-18-2016, 06:35 PM
  #152  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,772
Received 3,599 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by subshooter
That is funny. A belly laugh for me.
+1!
Old 10-18-2016, 06:43 PM
  #153  
Gary JR
Rennlist Member
 
Gary JR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: S Carolina coast & N Carolina mountains
Posts: 1,785
Received 158 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
+1!
I want my 2 secs back tho.
Old 10-19-2016, 01:46 PM
  #154  
Elphilly
Intermediate
 
Elphilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 39
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by subshooter
That is funny. A belly laugh for me.
+1
Old 10-19-2016, 04:10 PM
  #155  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I question the change only because I would have loved to see what the next generation N/A would have looked like. 450 hp possibly more. Similar advancements with retaining the classic sound and throttle response. Surely it's going to be missed by many.
Old 10-19-2016, 04:13 PM
  #156  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,772
Received 3,599 Likes on 2,341 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimbo1111
I'm thinking a GT4 PDK, but I have greater humility for your prediction.
could be - not long too wait!
Old 10-19-2016, 04:20 PM
  #157  
Gary JR
Rennlist Member
 
Gary JR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: S Carolina coast & N Carolina mountains
Posts: 1,785
Received 158 Likes on 113 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimbo1111
I question the change only because I would have loved to see what the next generation N/A would have looked like. 450 hp possibly more. Similar advancements with retaining the classic sound and throttle response. Surely it's going to be missed by many.
and big gas guzzler tax surcharges.
Old 10-19-2016, 04:28 PM
  #158  
KenTO
Burning Brakes
 
KenTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,110
Received 548 Likes on 207 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
+1!
Originally Posted by subshooter
That is funny. A belly laugh for me.
😉 I thought it would end the NA vs Turbo debate once and for all
Old 10-19-2016, 04:29 PM
  #159  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary JR
and big gas guzzler tax surcharges.
What's another $2000 going to do? $hit. I bet the added markup on the turbo tech is more than that. Let's see the msrp on this new and improved GTS
Old 10-19-2016, 04:33 PM
  #160  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
could be - not long too wait!
Why keep us in suspense? If you know something spill the beans to your fellow listers. Lol
Old 10-19-2016, 05:00 PM
  #161  
GTS1
Advanced
 
GTS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 63
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Jimbo - I'm with you . We need a new cost approachable NA drivers car version as a regular in the model range. It is getting embarrassing out there. Two excerpts from a recent major car mag article comparing 17 Corvette GS vs 2017 911 S:

"Not exactly thrilling in normal driving, but this is, when rated as an automobile, an excellent car," he says. "This 911 offers shocking levels of performance for its engine size and output, and indeed it would make a comfortable, easy-to-live-with daily driver. But it's missing a lot of the excitement that would make it a great occasional-use sports car."

"I think that the issue of which one of these two cars is better partly comes down to a head-versus-heart battle," Lieberman says. "Logically speaking, I think the 911 makes great sense and would easily satisfy all of my everyday needs. The only problem is that I'd be daydreaming of driving the Grand Sport while I'm out grocery shopping in the Porsche."
Old 10-19-2016, 05:07 PM
  #162  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GTS1
Jimbo - I'm with you . We need a new cost approachable NA drivers car version as a regular in the model range. It is getting embarrassing out there. Two excerpts from a recent major car mag article comparing 17 Corvette GS vs 2017 911 S:

"Not exactly thrilling in normal driving, but this is, when rated as an automobile, an excellent car," he says. "This 911 offers shocking levels of performance for its engine size and output, and indeed it would make a comfortable, easy-to-live-with daily driver. But it's missing a lot of the excitement that would make it a great occasional-use sports car."

"I think that the issue of which one of these two cars is better partly comes down to a head-versus-heart battle," Lieberman says. "Logically speaking, I think the 911 makes great sense and would easily satisfy all of my everyday needs. The only problem is that I'd be daydreaming of driving the Grand Sport while I'm out grocery shopping in the Porsche."
Yeah but a vette carries no status. Unfortunately it has become labeled as a guido aspirated vehicle and those that own it are grouped into the fold. The Porsche on the other hand screams out success and turbo or not will glorify the driver.

Last edited by jimbo1111; 10-19-2016 at 06:10 PM.
Old 10-19-2016, 05:12 PM
  #163  
Hurricane
Race Car
 
Hurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,392
Received 691 Likes on 314 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary JR
and big gas guzzler tax surcharges.
My 3.8 liter Powerkit is rated at 19/27 - how bad would it have to be to get gas guzzler surcharge? Does the GT3 or GT3RS get gas guzzler surcharges? (I am honestly asking - I really don't know.)

Old 10-19-2016, 06:08 PM
  #164  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hurricane
My 3.8 liter Powerkit is rated at 19/27 - how bad would it have to be to get gas guzzler surcharge? Does the GT3 or GT3RS get gas guzzler surcharges? (I am honestly asking - I really don't know.)

Yes they do. I believe it was around $1300 at the end of 15 when I was in the market for one.
Old 10-19-2016, 06:25 PM
  #165  
Hurricane
Race Car
 
Hurricane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,392
Received 691 Likes on 314 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jimbo1111
Yes they do. I believe it was around $1300 at the end of 15 when I was in the market for one.
Well shoot, if that is all it is then...





Quick Reply: 991.2 GTS'es are coming as 2017 MY, 3.0L tt



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:40 AM.