On the Road in the 2017 Porsche 911 Carrera S
#16
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Still really not loving the tail pipe arrangement. Or the rear grill. Otherwise, it doesn't seem remarkably different in appearance, to my eye, from the pictures.
And the manual transmission isn't dead, which is good.
And the manual transmission isn't dead, which is good.
#18
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I wonder if that will be part of a "Sports Chrono" pkg...
#19
Race Car
#20
Rennlist Member
#21
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
RAS is a big deal. Shoulda done it on the GTS.
All the rest is pretty much what I expected- modest HP increase with plenty of low end torque overcompensating for RIP NA.
Okay I am gonna go out on a limb here and subject myself to endless ridicule (okay, that's not a limb, that's SOP) and ask, two thousand SEVENTEENS go on order November two thousand FIFTEEN???
All the rest is pretty much what I expected- modest HP increase with plenty of low end torque overcompensating for RIP NA.
Okay I am gonna go out on a limb here and subject myself to endless ridicule (okay, that's not a limb, that's SOP) and ask, two thousand SEVENTEENS go on order November two thousand FIFTEEN???
#22
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looks, and by all accounts, drives great.
Can't wait to get one to try out.
#WhatsNotToLike
Can't wait to get one to try out.
#WhatsNotToLike
#24
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looks like a detuned version of my M4
It will be interesting to see the first comparison between these two cars. I think the consensus best tuner for BMW is Dinan and they have a pretty good explanation on their website for 'getting around' a stock ECU. It seems these turbo charged engines have pretty big capabilities beyond the stock tune
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
The use of same engine block, with minor difference in tuning and possible supporting hardware (intercooler, exhaust setup, etc.) is a bit of lazy engineering, but expected after all... The C2S better have a significant chassis upgrade over the standard Carrera to justify the price difference.
#25
Instructor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for posting! Undoubtedly it has to be faster. Every iteration is slightly faster.
The true test is what kind of visceral reactions you get when driving it. A lot of us appreciate the air-cooled sound and response. Others love the rougher and more direct 997 generation. And still most of us on the 991 forum appreciate the execution combined with a (mostly) analogue experience.
I completely understand the move towards turbos, but I will always be happy about my NA 991. Whenever my massive (by future standards) 3.8 engine winds up and I can hear it fully with my windows down, I will say a prayer of thanks to the gods that allow me to experience this.
The true test is what kind of visceral reactions you get when driving it. A lot of us appreciate the air-cooled sound and response. Others love the rougher and more direct 997 generation. And still most of us on the 991 forum appreciate the execution combined with a (mostly) analogue experience.
I completely understand the move towards turbos, but I will always be happy about my NA 991. Whenever my massive (by future standards) 3.8 engine winds up and I can hear it fully with my windows down, I will say a prayer of thanks to the gods that allow me to experience this.
#27
Three Wheelin'
#28
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Starting to look like there will be more positives than negatives. The real proof will be in the driving experience.
On our current cars the key to wringing out the best performance is keeping the car in the higher rev range as our torque is modest for low end grunt. The turbos will have the grunt down low so finessing the RPM's to minimize lag might be similar with greater payback in overall performance.
I drive on twisty back roads daily. This will the real test for me to see if I can get the same thrill level when taking the car through gear changes for this type of driving. I am a turbo fan so it will interesting to SS how the car handles in real life. I'm tired of all the debate and just reading about it but I know that is part of he pre launch mania.
On our current cars the key to wringing out the best performance is keeping the car in the higher rev range as our torque is modest for low end grunt. The turbos will have the grunt down low so finessing the RPM's to minimize lag might be similar with greater payback in overall performance.
I drive on twisty back roads daily. This will the real test for me to see if I can get the same thrill level when taking the car through gear changes for this type of driving. I am a turbo fan so it will interesting to SS how the car handles in real life. I'm tired of all the debate and just reading about it but I know that is part of he pre launch mania.
#30
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nothing revolutionary as far as I can see over my 50th or the current GTS...more evolutionary despite the move to Turbos. Believe they are leaving a lot of room for more performance with the modest hp/Q gains in the future .2 model. The RAS and Front Axle Lift are interesting to me though may not be the worth the extra cost. Cosmetics--neutral on the front, negative on the rear...bet the vertical grilles go away on the next evolution.