Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

On the Road in the 2017 Porsche 911 Carrera S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2015, 08:35 PM
  #16  
mathfuzzy
Rennlist Member
 
mathfuzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 1,423
Received 397 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

Still really not loving the tail pipe arrangement. Or the rear grill. Otherwise, it doesn't seem remarkably different in appearance, to my eye, from the pictures.

And the manual transmission isn't dead, which is good.
Old 08-07-2015, 08:43 PM
  #17  
john45in
Rennlist Member
 
john45in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: just west of Cincinnati
Posts: 251
Received 22 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

What's not to like? More torque, more power and more gismos. When my 13 C4 comes off CPO in 2019 there'll be a CPO 991.2!!!!
Old 08-07-2015, 08:46 PM
  #18  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,529
Received 3,433 Likes on 2,244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tomc_mets
Article said (or I read it) rear wheel steering would be optional on the S. Anyone excited by that?
T
not really, but its claimed that this is a major contributor to the cornering abilities of the GT3 and RS ... so it moves the S closer to the GTs in handling
I wonder if that will be part of a "Sports Chrono" pkg...
Old 08-07-2015, 08:52 PM
  #19  
chuckbdc
Race Car
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,558
Received 309 Likes on 184 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
not really, but its claimed that this is a major contributor to the cornering abilities of the GT3 and RS ... so it moves the S closer to the GTs in handling
I wonder if that will be part of a "Sports Chrono" pkg...
Sport Chrono+$$ more likely!
Old 08-07-2015, 08:54 PM
  #20  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,529
Received 3,433 Likes on 2,244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuckbdc
Sport Chrono+$$ more likely!
Old 08-07-2015, 11:38 PM
  #21  
chuck911
Race Car
 
chuck911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,522
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

RAS is a big deal. Shoulda done it on the GTS.

All the rest is pretty much what I expected- modest HP increase with plenty of low end torque overcompensating for RIP NA.

Okay I am gonna go out on a limb here and subject myself to endless ridicule (okay, that's not a limb, that's SOP) and ask, two thousand SEVENTEENS go on order November two thousand FIFTEEN???
Old 08-08-2015, 01:14 AM
  #22  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,337
Likes: 0
Received 10,770 Likes on 4,771 Posts
Default

Looks, and by all accounts, drives great.

Can't wait to get one to try out.

#WhatsNotToLike
Old 08-08-2015, 01:23 AM
  #23  
MJG911
Three Wheelin'
 
MJG911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Loganville (Atlanta) GA
Posts: 1,675
Received 54 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

I'm looking forward to it. While my S has 100 more hp than the M235i I traded it in on, it doesn't feel as fast in everyday driving. I love a factory turbo setup.
Old 08-08-2015, 01:41 AM
  #24  
cloud9blue
Rennlist Member
 
cloud9blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: East Coast, USA
Posts: 211
Received 83 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96redLT4
Looks like a detuned version of my M4It will be interesting to see the first comparison between these two cars. I think the consensus best tuner for BMW is Dinan and they have a pretty good explanation on their website for 'getting around' a stock ECU. It seems these turbo charged engines have pretty big capabilities beyond the stock tune
I am sorry but you couldn't be more wrong than that. I sincerely hope Dinan doesn't get involved with the tuning of these new turbocharged Porsche down the line. Or else we will end up with overpriced $5000 tune with some shady "warranty" that does virtually nothing ... Would much prefer the guys at Cobb and BMS get instead.

The use of same engine block, with minor difference in tuning and possible supporting hardware (intercooler, exhaust setup, etc.) is a bit of lazy engineering, but expected after all... The C2S better have a significant chassis upgrade over the standard Carrera to justify the price difference.
Old 08-08-2015, 04:23 AM
  #25  
PDX991
Advanced
 
PDX991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 98
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Thanks for posting! Undoubtedly it has to be faster. Every iteration is slightly faster.

The true test is what kind of visceral reactions you get when driving it. A lot of us appreciate the air-cooled sound and response. Others love the rougher and more direct 997 generation. And still most of us on the 991 forum appreciate the execution combined with a (mostly) analogue experience.

I completely understand the move towards turbos, but I will always be happy about my NA 991. Whenever my massive (by future standards) 3.8 engine winds up and I can hear it fully with my windows down, I will say a prayer of thanks to the gods that allow me to experience this.
Old 08-08-2015, 04:49 AM
  #26  
freeflow
3rd Gear
 
freeflow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for sharing. That engine grill...
Old 08-08-2015, 07:43 AM
  #27  
hinckley
Three Wheelin'
 
hinckley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,409
Received 253 Likes on 144 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chuck911
two thousand SEVENTEENS go on order November two thousand FIFTEEN???
You may be able to place an order this year, but you're not going to see a 991.2 until early-2016. And a MY17 model in early CY16 (even if it's January) is not crazy uncommon.
Old 08-08-2015, 09:15 AM
  #28  
Penn4S
Rennlist Member
 
Penn4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,668
Received 1,300 Likes on 730 Posts
Default

Starting to look like there will be more positives than negatives. The real proof will be in the driving experience.

On our current cars the key to wringing out the best performance is keeping the car in the higher rev range as our torque is modest for low end grunt. The turbos will have the grunt down low so finessing the RPM's to minimize lag might be similar with greater payback in overall performance.

I drive on twisty back roads daily. This will the real test for me to see if I can get the same thrill level when taking the car through gear changes for this type of driving. I am a turbo fan so it will interesting to SS how the car handles in real life. I'm tired of all the debate and just reading about it but I know that is part of he pre launch mania.
Old 08-08-2015, 09:31 AM
  #29  
guod
Intermediate
 
guod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I think it looks great! Front is a big improvement
Old 08-08-2015, 09:43 AM
  #30  
Pavegeno928
Rennlist Member
 
Pavegeno928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,959
Received 429 Likes on 228 Posts
Default

Nothing revolutionary as far as I can see over my 50th or the current GTS...more evolutionary despite the move to Turbos. Believe they are leaving a lot of room for more performance with the modest hp/Q gains in the future .2 model. The RAS and Front Axle Lift are interesting to me though may not be the worth the extra cost. Cosmetics--neutral on the front, negative on the rear...bet the vertical grilles go away on the next evolution.


Quick Reply: On the Road in the 2017 Porsche 911 Carrera S



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:44 PM.