Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

On the Road in the 2017 Porsche 911 Carrera S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2015, 02:57 PM
  #1  
-Ryan-
Pro
Thread Starter
 
-Ryan-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Palm Springs
Posts: 500
Received 29 Likes on 19 Posts
Default On the Road in the 2017 Porsche 911 Carrera S

Interesting read from Automobile Magazine

http://www.automobilemag.com/reviews...911-carrera-s/
Old 08-07-2015, 03:09 PM
  #2  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,531
Received 3,437 Likes on 2,247 Posts
Default

"Look closer, though, and you’ll spot the two intercoolers stowed away in the rear fenders. They cool a new turbocharged, 3.0-liter flat-six. The base Carrera has the same engine in 370-hp tune. Here in the Carrera S, it produces 420 hp at 6,500 rpm. As far as the maximum torque is concerned, it’s 332 lb-ft against 369 lb-ft in the Carrera, which is available from 1,700 to 5,000 rpm in both trims. That’s a boost of about 20 hp and about 45 lb-ft over its predecessor, which isn’t much. But Porsche claims the way in which that power and torque is delivered makes all the difference
"

there we go
Old 08-07-2015, 03:24 PM
  #3  
joeyrocks
Advanced
 
joeyrocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Southwest
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Glad that I picked up the 2015 and didn't wait for this one.

What I don't like:

- Turbos
- Too much Plastic
- Rear Tail Lights
- Interior seems unchanged?
Old 08-07-2015, 03:40 PM
  #4  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,531
Received 3,437 Likes on 2,247 Posts
Default

1) one 3.0L engine two tunes
2) optional front axle lift
3) optional RWS
5) five "Sport Chrono" modes
6) optional GT3 PCCBs ... I wonder if the S will get the GT3 steels as stock?
Old 08-07-2015, 03:41 PM
  #5  
CAPTAIN 911
Instructor
 
CAPTAIN 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WOW! It is beautiful and as mesmerizing like never before.
Old 08-07-2015, 04:26 PM
  #6  
mtbscott
Burning Brakes
 
mtbscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I predict lots of handwringing but many here and elsewhere will continue to buy. Like every iteration of 911 that has come before it is faster, more powerful, and more efficient than the one it replaces.
My only thought is they really need to make the S version a good value for more than its horsepower bump. It's inevitable that with the same engine an aftermarket tuner will unlock the withheld ponies on the base car in short order.
Old 08-07-2015, 04:30 PM
  #7  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,531
Received 3,437 Likes on 2,247 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mtbscott
I predict lots of handwringing but many here and elsewhere will continue to buy. Like every iteration of 911 that has come before it is faster, more powerful, and more efficient than the one it replaces.
My only thought is they really need to make the S version a good value for more than its horsepower bump. It's inevitable that with the same engine an aftermarket tuner will unlock the withheld ponies on the base car in short order.
The latest (991) generation of ECU systems are incredibly difficult to "hack" into since Siemens/Bosch have responded to manufacturers requests to prohibit aftermarket tuners from changing the programming... but we will see!
Old 08-07-2015, 04:49 PM
  #8  
mtbscott
Burning Brakes
 
mtbscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

MINI's (BMW) used to be that way too Larry but the genie's been out of the bottle for a while now. The newest generation F56 JCW that's only been out a couple of months already has tunes.
Old 08-07-2015, 04:53 PM
  #9  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,531
Received 3,437 Likes on 2,247 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mtbscott
MINI's (BMW) used to be that way too Larry but the genie's been out of the bottle for a while now. The newest generation F56 JCW that's only been out a couple of months already has tunes.
good to know ... I looked around after I posted seems that there are a couple of 991 flashes....
Old 08-07-2015, 05:09 PM
  #10  
BobPopular
Intermediate
 
BobPopular's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 42
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Although there appear to be some interesting upgrades, I don't see anything that makes me regret the 2016 C2S I have on order. Perhaps the more thorough reviews that will come later in the year will lead to that.
Old 08-07-2015, 05:14 PM
  #11  
PTSRS
Racer
 
PTSRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Boston/Toronto
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wow these are the first official shots of the 991.2 I guess then. I have to say as much as I love the current naturally aspirated 991s, it looks like Porsche did the best they could with the transition to turbo. And frankly, I think the exterior looks fine. I find the new front fascia much more harmonious than the 991.1's and the rear looks decent. My only gripe so far is the new rear vents (much prefer the horizontal slats) but I'll get used to them too.
Old 08-07-2015, 06:28 PM
  #12  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,858 Likes on 1,902 Posts
Default

Positives. If those times are accurate, it's a fair bit quicker than the current C2S.

Negatives. It's not better looking than the car it replaces. We still have no idea about lag, as the author wasn't driving and the car was being driven in manual model by a pro driver who admittedly was keeping the revs up in the meat of the power band.

Seems like the fuel efficiency gain is dead on what I expected (1-2 city, 2-4 highway), in fact may be a little less, since those are the improvements in the silly European tests.

Still think both bumpers look kinda fugly, but that color hides it better than most.
Old 08-07-2015, 07:40 PM
  #13  
96redLT4
Rennlist Member
 
96redLT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,859
Received 280 Likes on 159 Posts
Default

Looks like a detuned version of my M4It will be interesting to see the first comparison between these two cars. I think the consensus best tuner for BMW is Dinan and they have a pretty good explanation on their website for 'getting around' a stock ECU. It seems these turbo charged engines have pretty big capabilities beyond the stock tune
Old 08-07-2015, 07:49 PM
  #14  
vantage
Three Wheelin'
 
vantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,846
Received 169 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
" As far as the maximum torque is concerned, it’s 332 lb-ft against 369 lb-ft in the Carrera, which is available from 1,700 to 5,000 rpm in both trims. That’s a boost of about 20 hp and about 45 lb-ft over its predecessor, which isn’t much. But Porsche claims the way in which that power and torque is delivered makes all the difference[/I]
"
What the article is missing is that it's not only peak numbers, but area under the curve that matters. For example, 370 lb-ft at 2k rpm in the new turbo car. Compare that to the torque available in the current car at 2k!

I still prefer n/a engines in my sports cars, but the performance advantage of turbos is undeniable. This article makes the new car seem very relaxed in character, yet fast. So even more of a GT then.
Old 08-07-2015, 08:21 PM
  #15  
tomc_mets
Sir Thomas Lord of All Mets Fans
Rennlist Member
 
tomc_mets's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,983
Received 113 Likes on 90 Posts
Default On the Road in the 2017 Porsche 911 Carrera S

Article said (or I read it) rear wheel steering would be optional on the S. Anyone excited by that?
T


Quick Reply: On the Road in the 2017 Porsche 911 Carrera S



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:31 AM.