Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 PSDS review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2012, 06:23 PM
  #106  
sapman
Rennlist Member
 
sapman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 897
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wanna911
Stop reading magazines and drive more, then you will understand my response below.




I think you may have misunderstood the information I am trying to gather. The only way to truly test two platforms is to eliminate the variables as much as possible. PDK, whilst even in regular mode, will still shift faster than manual, so for a same day test of the two vehicles, the 991 still had all of the advantages, having more hp, lighter weight, and faster shifting. I would buy a 991 with absolutely the least amount of options possible.

For anyone who does not like to drive with all the crap on it, we will be interested in how the platfom handles in it's most basic form, not laden with a bunch of error fixing electronics, because that's how most of us like driving on the track.

This means a lot more to me than any magazine test. And even still, in sport mode, it's not like the 991 was going to pick up several seconds, so still a win for the 997 in my book.
You're avoiding the question.

You said "You don't find out what a car is really about until you strip it down of all of the nannies and go for it."

A manual 997 beat a 991 shifting in comfort mode around the track. How is that a realistic or fair comparison? To drive a PDK round a track in such a manner is handicapping the car.

Your response did nothing to explain how you driving a PDK without sport mode is a "Nanny".

Can you clarify how that is a "Nanny"? Or are you going to try to avoid that question again?


Originally Posted by alexb76
+1...

Love it that all 991 fanboys are trying to find EXCUSES why 997 was faster and preffered during this event by multiple folks! ooh, there was no sports button, PDK shifting was off, driver was an idiot, etc...

Actually, IF Sports button was disabled, it makes it more even between those.
The only excuses being made here are people grasping at straws to try and explain how a 997 could beat a 991 while ignoring the fact that an integral part of the 991's functionality is disabled.

Are you really going with this? You think Porsche would release a 911 slower than the previous model? You are going to believe one badly written report devoid of details versus the world's motoring press?

I can understand when people say they don't like how the 991 drives. That's a perfectly rational argument (though it is sometimes used to cover other reasons why a new model 911 is threatening), but your argument that the 997 is faster than the 991 flies in the face of overwhelming evidence. Sorry, but that's a fact and your neuroses are going to have to find some other posts to quote and put your +10000000000s on.

Originally Posted by alexb76
991 is a Sports GT car, targeted to a new audience, while *trying* not to lose the old audience, that's the bottom line! GET IT?! It is for some who like a softer, bigger, more cushy Porsche, and not to others who prefer a more raw and sporty experience... that's it!
Simple question - Have you driven a 991?
Old 04-26-2012, 06:32 PM
  #107  
zanwar
Pro
 
zanwar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mike in CA
In normal or even spirited driving, it's a LOT different. In a track situation, PDK in standard mode does adapt but the mapping changes between sport and comfort when the opportunity arises. Shifts generally occur well short of redline unless you are foot to the floor and torque is reduced between shifts for smoother action. Also in sport plus 7th gear is locked out; you don't want OD to engage on track. Unlike sport plus or even sport mode I find standard mode to be less responsive and consistent, which makes it harder for me to be consistent and fast.
It never occurred to me they might be running at the track in standard automatic mode, rather than manual override. Even then, in a road course situation you're generally deep into the gas or the brake, or you're subject to corner load which should prevent the computer from initiating a shift. If there was a difference in 997/991 performance on the day, I would imagine it was related to lack of experience with the newer car. Just from looking at the specs of the 991, it should be faster on a medium speed track.
Old 04-26-2012, 08:04 PM
  #108  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sapman
Simple question - Have you driven a 991?
YES, Twice... Once was AFTER test driving the new McLaren, which was simply amazing!

How many time did you drive it? and for how long? Have you EVER lapped Nurburgring before? Did you attend last 3yrs of Porsche Cup in Germany? At Hockenheim and Nurburgring?

Even the sales manager (who I know for years) said 991 is more luxury, softer while 997 was more sporty, less luxury. It is also being targeted like that at the dealer, they were telling this guy that the new 911 is larger, more compliant ride, quieter, and has better electronics, and luxury items hence fits the luxury needs of you (he had an AMG). That's what the sales guy was totally highlighting, NO MENTION of performance or handling. THAT's HOW it's targetted, to get M3, AMG customers!

I mean come on guys, there's no denying the fact that 991 is LESS of a sports car, and more of a GT. They did that while keeping the performance in-line with 997 sportier car, which is an achievement on its own, while they have changed the DNA of the car, so it is not to the liking of many as you can see for yourself! You simply cannot deny that, if you did, you have an agenda, are blind, or ignorant.

Whether or not the car is faster, can be debated and proven by different drivers, at different events,etc... but the 991 is MORE GT, ALL AROUND... there's absolutely no question about it. It's even marketed/targeted that way, just watch their advertising.

PS. I see you've ordered one, but probably haven't got it yet, and I guess are upset people are reviewing your ordered car negatively! Apologies and congrats on your purchase, it's a good car, it's just a different car than 997, and less of a 911 with different character that doesn't fit mine and many others' needs, while it definitely meets yours, so as long as you enjoy the car, who cares what others and I say here? Enjoy it!
Old 04-26-2012, 08:31 PM
  #109  
wanna911
Race Car
 
wanna911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: With A Manual Transmission
Posts: 4,728
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sapman
You're avoiding the question.

You said "You don't find out what a car is really about until you strip it down of all of the nannies and go for it."

A manual 997 beat a 991 shifting in comfort mode around the track. How is that a realistic or fair comparison? To drive a PDK round a track in such a manner is handicapping the car.

Your response did nothing to explain how you driving a PDK without sport mode is a "Nanny".

Can you clarify how that is a "Nanny"? Or are you going to try to avoid that question again?




The only excuses being made here are people grasping at straws to try and explain how a 997 could beat a 991 while ignoring the fact that an integral part of the 991's functionality is disabled.

Are you really going with this? You think Porsche would release a 911 slower than the previous model? You are going to believe one badly written report devoid of details versus the world's motoring press?

I can understand when people say they don't like how the 991 drives. That's a perfectly rational argument (though it is sometimes used to cover other reasons why a new model 911 is threatening), but your argument that the 997 is faster than the 991 flies in the face of overwhelming evidence. Sorry, but that's a fact and your neuroses are going to have to find some other posts to quote and put your +10000000000s on.



Simple question - Have you driven a 991?
You seem to be barking up all the wrong trees.

Pdk is a nanny, a little handicap only makes the straight line performance more even. Barber is a handling track not a HP track and even in comfort mode the 991 still has a plethora of advantages as i mentioned. So the 997 would have had.to handle better to go faster.

Stop trying to act like the 991 had three wheels.on it. Comfort mode does not mean half throttle.
Old 04-26-2012, 08:44 PM
  #110  
Monetthecat
Instructor
 
Monetthecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 243
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Its my 5th post so newbie to the group here...

These debates b/t 997 and 991 are making the Marketing department back in Stuttgart deliriously happy. Its telling them that the direction that Porsche took with the 991 was right on point. The verifies for Porsche the immense brand loyalty that Porsche owners have, keeps the 997 alive and well until the 991 variants arrive (4, 4S, GTS, GTS4, Black, GT3, etc) and opens the 911 model up for more buyers.

I think Porsche knows that to continue sales growth of the 911 they need to appeal to a broader audience. Aston, Audi, Jaguar and Maserati have all targeted (really good) products in the $100-$130K range that offer a threat to the 911 in one way or another. Not to mention the proliferation of AMG models and the next gen M6.

My personal experience is that I’ve owned my fair share of German sports cars (term used loosely) including AMG, Audi S/RS and BMW M. Each time the itch arrives for a purchase I’ve marched myself down to the local Porsche dealer for a test drive of a 911. Done this 3 times with the 996, 997.1 and 997.2. Each time I walk away with an overall impression that the car is brilliant. Everything from seating comfort, steering, performance, etc… is nearly perfect. The engineering in the car is beyond what my driving capabilities will ever be. However, I force myself to answer one question during the test drive and that is do I want to be in this car on a Friday night, in stop-n-go traffic on Lakeshore Drive (Chicago) when the Cubs have a night game.

The problem is the answer has always been “no” to this point. It’s not that the 996/997 are not easy enough to drive, but (for me) it wasn’t a place I wanted to spend time in if I wasn’t moving forward. I had the same experience on test drives of the Audi R8. Brilliant on open road (perhaps more so than the 911), but a bear to drive in traffic (certainly more so than the 911). So back to AMG, RS and M I went.

So along comes the 991 and I take my test drive. I finally answer the question “yes”. It’s hard to say why, but overall cabin comfort, throttle response, in-cabin tech, etc.. all play into it. I don't want to spending $100K on a car that I cannot drive every day (winter weather permitting).

So Porsche knows that many people will be put off by the GT’ness of the 991, but in doing so they gather more buyers and in the near future roll out the GTS and GT3 991 models to address those that want a more visceral experience that might be missing for some.
Old 04-26-2012, 09:12 PM
  #111  
tgcrun
Three Wheelin'
 
tgcrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,319
Received 440 Likes on 234 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Monetthecat
Its my 5th post so newbie to the group here...

These debates b/t 997 and 991 are making the Marketing department back in Stuttgart deliriously happy. Its telling them that the direction that Porsche took with the 991 was right on point. The verifies for Porsche the immense brand loyalty that Porsche owners have, keeps the 997 alive and well until the 991 variants arrive (4, 4S, GTS, GTS4, Black, GT3, etc) and opens the 911 model up for more buyers.

I think Porsche knows that to continue sales growth of the 911 they need to appeal to a broader audience. Aston, Audi, Jaguar and Maserati have all targeted (really good) products in the $100-$130K range that offer a threat to the 911 in one way or another. Not to mention the proliferation of AMG models and the next gen M6.

My personal experience is that I’ve owned my fair share of German sports cars (term used loosely) including AMG, Audi S/RS and BMW M. Each time the itch arrives for a purchase I’ve marched myself down to the local Porsche dealer for a test drive of a 911. Done this 3 times with the 996, 997.1 and 997.2. Each time I walk away with an overall impression that the car is brilliant. Everything from seating comfort, steering, performance, etc… is nearly perfect. The engineering in the car is beyond what my driving capabilities will ever be. However, I force myself to answer one question during the test drive and that is do I want to be in this car on a Friday night, in stop-n-go traffic on Lakeshore Drive (Chicago) when the Cubs have a night game.

The problem is the answer has always been “no” to this point. It’s not that the 996/997 are not easy enough to drive, but (for me) it wasn’t a place I wanted to spend time in if I wasn’t moving forward. I had the same experience on test drives of the Audi R8. Brilliant on open road (perhaps more so than the 911), but a bear to drive in traffic (certainly more so than the 911). So back to AMG, RS and M I went.

So along comes the 991 and I take my test drive. I finally answer the question “yes”. It’s hard to say why, but overall cabin comfort, throttle response, in-cabin tech, etc.. all play into it. I don't want to spending $100K on a car that I cannot drive every day (winter weather permitting).

So Porsche knows that many people will be put off by the GT’ness of the 991, but in doing so they gather more buyers and in the near future roll out the GTS and GT3 991 models to address those that want a more visceral experience that might be missing for some.
You might be a newbie, but that was very well said. Despite all the debate, the scorn, and the insults, I'm STILL looking forward to my 991S Cab, and like most of the 991 owners on this board, I'm gonna love it. And I'm not a newbie to Porsche ownership; this will be my 6th 911.
Old 04-26-2012, 09:34 PM
  #112  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,974
Received 360 Likes on 217 Posts
Default

I wonder if the procentage of whiners is more than 1%. The so called ' purists '. I doubt it... What do you think?
The whiners sound like a broken record. This is similar to the protests that happened on Wall Street and all over the country,only that those were the 99%.
As I've said in another thread,THE PORSCHE BRAND IS A BUSINESS and they're looking for profit.
Without the introduction of the Cayenne and Panamera,Porsche might have been bankrupt by now. Those 2 models bring the most profit.
Porsche Executives need to make business decisions,even if that ' upsets ' the 1%.
That's all there is...A BUSINESS!
We'll see in the future if it was a good business decision or not...
BTW,I really enjoyed my 991S test drive,I think it's a 911 alright...!
Old 04-26-2012, 09:37 PM
  #113  
DrJay
Burning Brakes
 
DrJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 929
Received 32 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

and yet, 997s sit on dealer lots unsold while 991s fly off the lot...
Old 04-26-2012, 09:37 PM
  #114  
speed21
Banned
 
speed21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
+1...

This concludes again that 991 is simply NOT that much faster than 997 as everyone expected due to Ring times! This was not the case when Porsche moved from 996 to 997, massive improvements all around!
No offence but I'm lost with your comment on ring times? My understanding is 991 consistently matches 997GT3.2 around Nurburgring. Thats quite a feat wouldnt you say? And the times are proof of that. I didn't see that was the case with the 997 vs 997GT3.1 or .2....as the times confirm that as well. So im not clear with what you mean when you state the 991 is not much faster than 997 when the official times between these two cars actually confirm quite a significant difference. So what do you refer to as not that much faster? Are you refering to the acceleration perhaps? Confused....

btw did you happen to read this? http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/9...l-masters.html

I ask because it does kinda contradict the OP. Just saying...its odd how one "group" can come up with an entirely different conclusion to the other.

Originally Posted by fbroen
"One thing that MJones did not mention was that the SPORT MODES were totally disabled through PIWIS at the course."

That pretty much invalidates the MT vs PDK comparison made here, me thinks.
Agree, and considering the funtionality of PSM and Sport Modes id've likened that to putting a prized fighter into the ring with his hands roped behind his back. Not really a way to make any fair comparison really.
Old 04-26-2012, 10:41 PM
  #115  
MJones
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
MJones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Sport mode was available to be used on the 991 at PSDS..
Old 04-26-2012, 10:51 PM
  #116  
sapman
Rennlist Member
 
sapman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 897
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexb76
YES, Twice... Once was AFTER test driving the new McLaren, which was simply amazing!
I suppose the 997 is faster then the Macca also?

Originally Posted by alexb76
How many time did you drive it? and for how long?
I just bought one and test drove it for two days.

Originally Posted by alexb76
Have you EVER lapped Nurburgring before? Did you attend last 3yrs of Porsche Cup in Germany? At Hockenheim and Nurburgring?
Not sure what the relevance here is, unless you are trying to get into some sort of pissing contest. ( I have no interest in that) But if you are really that curious, having worked and lived in Europe for over 20 years, I have driven the 'Ring a few times and been to lots of different tracks as a spectator (Spa, Silverstone, Monaco etc.).

Originally Posted by alexb76
Even the sales manager (who I know for years) said 991 is more luxury, softer while 997 was more sporty, less luxury. It is also being targeted like that at the dealer, they were telling this guy that the new 911 is larger, more compliant ride, quieter, and has better electronics, and luxury items hence fits the luxury needs of you (he had an AMG). That's what the sales guy was totally highlighting, NO MENTION of performance or handling. THAT's HOW it's targetted, to get M3, AMG customers!
Ah, the sales manager. A well known source of information nobody else has access to.

I wonder did they use the "911 is larger, more compliant ride, quieter, and has better electronics, and luxury items hence fits the luxury needs of you" line when they were selling the 997 back in 04/05. It was as true then as it is now.

Originally Posted by alexb76
I mean come on guys, there's no denying the fact that 991 is LESS of a sports car, and more of a GT.
Compared to what? The 997? How does that compare to the 993 or 964, or hell, even the 356? The Goldilocks argument? The 997 is 'just right'?

Originally Posted by alexb76
Whether or not the car is faster, can be debated and proven by different drivers, at different events,etc...
Is that a way of saying that there is always some forum post that says "the 997 is faster than the 991" to go up against all of the press and tests that show otherwise? Model for model, the 991 is faster than the 997.

Originally Posted by alexb76
PS. I see you've ordered one, but probably haven't got it yet, and I guess are upset people are reviewing your ordered car negatively! Apologies and congrats on your purchase, it's a good car, it's just a different car than 997, and less of a 911 with different character that doesn't fit mine and many others' needs, while it definitely meets yours, so as long as you enjoy the car, who cares what others and I say here? Enjoy it!
I am not upset as there is no reason to be. It is just a metal box on four wheels. I had an extraordinary choice of cars to buy and I picked what was the best one for me. I nearly bought a 997 in 2006, but it didn't pan out. I can't imagine buying one now (except perhaps a 7.2 GT3) as it seems like old technology. If I were interested in the market for an older 911, it would be air cooled.

It does irk me somewhat to read people saying things that are borderline impossible to believe or categorically untrue just because they are unhappy in some way because there is a newer version of their car out. I notice that there hasn't been much written by pre 997 owners regarding this. I know there's a good psychology thesis there somewhere. Some call it passion, others might call it something else.
Old 04-26-2012, 10:54 PM
  #117  
sapman
Rennlist Member
 
sapman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 897
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MJones
Sport mode was available to be used on the 991 at PSDS..
Thanks for that. It is just the level of detail this thread is screaming for.
Old 04-26-2012, 11:02 PM
  #118  
sapman
Rennlist Member
 
sapman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 897
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wanna911
You seem to be barking up all the wrong trees.

Pdk is a nanny, a little handicap only makes the straight line performance more even. Barber is a handling track not a HP track and even in comfort mode the 991 still has a plethora of advantages as i mentioned. So the 997 would have had.to handle better to go faster.

Stop trying to act like the 991 had three wheels.on it. Comfort mode does not mean half throttle.
PDK is a nanny? A dual clutch transmission is a nanny? Interesting position, I'll leave it at that.

In any case, at this point the story of this so-called faster lap time lacks so much detail that I have to question how true it is. I can only imagine that the OP is wetting himself laughing at the furore it has created.
Old 04-26-2012, 11:03 PM
  #119  
KINGSRULE
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
KINGSRULE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 859
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MJones
Sport mode was available to be used on the 991 at PSDS..
One says yes, others say no

If the light isn't on then it's not on.

So for me this thread is tainted big time until someone from the PDS gives us a definitive answer on the cars used during MJones's class......
Old 04-26-2012, 11:05 PM
  #120  
alexb76
Rennlist Member
 
alexb76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 5,900
Received 83 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sapman
It does irk me somewhat to read people saying things that are borderline impossible to believe or categorically untrue just because they are unhappy in some way because there is a newer version of their car out. I notice that there hasn't been much written by pre 997 owners regarding this. I know there's a good psychology thesis there somewhere. Some call it passion, others might call it something else.
I don't wanna go back and forth... we disagree! NO ONE said 997 was WORSE than 996, did they? it was a MAJOR improvement in every way imabinable, EVEN IF it was very close in actual engineering (engine, body parts, etc...), it was significantly improved and basically as soon as it came out no one could WAIT to dump their 996 to get 997! This IS NOT THE CASE with 991...

Obviously you are more biased towards 991, since you bought one, so ofcourse if someone says anything negative about your car, it WILL bother you... but that doesn't change the facts.

As I said, the 991 appeals to some, while it doesn't to others, it's designed to appeal to a wider audience, BMW, Merc, Audi buyers, as well as more women, to have lower cost of production (share of component, electrical steering, etc), and specially to sell more in emerging markets, probably will sell a lot in China... for me, the best 911 to buy today is GTS, 991 has absolutely no major improvements over GTS to grant a premium (to me that is), you obviously disagree since you bought one... so congrats!


Quick Reply: 991 PSDS review



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:13 AM.