Cobb Pro-tune/APR tune Dragy results
#16
The multiple launch anomaly you are reporting is more than likely the protections that are built into the APR programing. Could be PDK temperature, could be IAT but that is only speculation on my part. It would take data logging to actually confirm.
The following users liked this post:
fsmich (06-25-2020)
#18
"I did have an issue with the APR tune doing multiple launches (about 8 in a row The 4th thru 6th shut down the power right after launch, including w/ PSM off."
Can you elaborate on this?
I was unaware of the x51 kit, but there is a HP/TQ level ( I dont know what it is) Where the flutter occurs. Maybe that extra 20hp is the tipping point?
I also have a 4 wheel drive to your 2 wheel drive. I have always felt that had something to do with these issues..
Can you elaborate on this?
I was unaware of the x51 kit, but there is a HP/TQ level ( I dont know what it is) Where the flutter occurs. Maybe that extra 20hp is the tipping point?
I also have a 4 wheel drive to your 2 wheel drive. I have always felt that had something to do with these issues..
I have the flutter on the cobb 93 pro- tune just like you, so I don't run it.
#19
I am not going to dyno the APR, I think the dragy numbers are a better comparison. The Cobb tq peaks at 3000, APR at 3700.
#21
Final end cost of APR installed?
Final end cost Cobb unit with Pro-tune?
I feel it's one topic no one talks about when comparing both, pricing should be considered as I'm sure there's a big difference between a flash and putting a car on a dyno with the extra cost of the Cobb unit
#22
I would like to know the cost and time it took to install both tunes
Final end cost of APR installed?
Final end cost Cobb unit with Pro-tune?
I feel it's one topic no one talks about when comparing both, pricing should be considered as I'm sure there's a big difference between a flash and putting a car on a dyno with the extra cost of the Cobb unit
Final end cost of APR installed?
Final end cost Cobb unit with Pro-tune?
I feel it's one topic no one talks about when comparing both, pricing should be considered as I'm sure there's a big difference between a flash and putting a car on a dyno with the extra cost of the Cobb unit
Cobb you buy the AP, new or used. Pro-tuner sets his own price for his work, mine was $800. If you dyno tune, the shop charges by the hour. I did 3 different maps, which took 3 hours on the dyno @150/hr.
#23
APR is installed at their dealer at the website price plus tax. $1615 for me. That dealer sets his own price for later removal/reinstall. Mine charges $25 each.
Cobb you buy the AP, new or used. Pro-tuner sets his own price for his work, mine was $800. If you dyno tune, the shop charges by the hour. I did 3 different maps, which took 3 hours on the dyno @150/hr.
Cobb you buy the AP, new or used. Pro-tuner sets his own price for his work, mine was $800. If you dyno tune, the shop charges by the hour. I did 3 different maps, which took 3 hours on the dyno @150/hr.
#24
That's purely a calibration choice. Tyler at APR decided to bring in the torque softer and later to achieve the 'feel' and drive-ability he wanted. Which makes sense for many/most of your everyday Porsche driver who may not have very good throttle modulation control. So for everyday driving, it would be less sensitive/jerky where you're driving around in the 2000-3000rpm range. If you're past 3700rpm, you're probably WOT already and intending to go fast.
#25
#27
That's purely a calibration choice. Tyler at APR decided to bring in the torque softer and later to achieve the 'feel' and drive-ability he wanted. Which makes sense for many/most of your everyday Porsche driver who may not have very good throttle modulation control. So for everyday driving, it would be less sensitive/jerky where you're driving around in the 2000-3000rpm range. If you're past 3700rpm, you're probably WOT already and intending to go fast.
We want to turn the power up, not back it off.
#28
Thanks!
#29
Mmm.... not necessarily. I do think the relative softness in the lower rpm range helps the majority of drivers. I was helping instruct a bit with a driving simulator a while back and the car loaded up was a Radical with no electronic aids. More than half the people looped it before even getting out of pit lane. One guy confided to me that his street car had 500hp. I think he looped it 3x before finally getting off pit lane. This does bring us back to the other discussion on track use with traction control
#30
Mmm.... not necessarily. I do think the relative softness in the lower rpm range helps the majority of drivers. I was helping instruct a bit with a driving simulator a while back and the car loaded up was a Radical with no electronic aids. More than half the people looped it before even getting out of pit lane. One guy confided to me that his street car had 500hp. I think he looped it 3x before finally getting off pit lane. This does bring us back to the other discussion on track use with traction control
Two, adaption. When driving street all the time, the car adapts and smooths out.
At track, WOT all the time, it adapts. So it seems to feel like, if the torque is ramped up, mashing the throttle when you first go out, i get the issue. But after the first session, it doesn’t seem to do it. Its as if in the earlier session, you took the ECU by surprise. Whereas once it adapted that your st the track, it expected you to floor it. So it seems to be sudden sharp changes in driving style, brings it out.