Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Do you dyno in sport or sport plus-**dyno results inside**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-17-2019, 04:22 PM
  #91  
Dom991.1
Burning Brakes
 
Dom991.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,141
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spdracerut;[url=tel:15847257
15847257[/url]]Last variable is gas. For some reason, Shell gas around LA is known to make measurably less power than 76 or Chevron. Not saying that I know what gas was in each car, but it's one significant variable.
Has anyone else found this to be the case? I’ve always considered Shell to be “top tier” & use 93 from there pretty regularly.
Old 05-17-2019, 05:19 PM
  #92  
spdracerut
Three Wheelin'
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,783
Received 583 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dom991.1
Has anyone else found this to be the case? I’ve always considered Shell to be “top tier” & use 93 from there pretty regularly.
It's top tier as far as consistency and quality/detergents, etc. But at least with Cali 91 oct, I've had both Road Race Engineering and Church Automotvie Tuning tell me Shell Cali 91 octane has the least detonation resistance.
Old 05-17-2019, 06:59 PM
  #93  
Grantsfo
Racer
 
Grantsfo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 498
Received 248 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sensr215
I just wrapped up a day of tuning at World Motorsports' dyno in LA. Jon from Dyno Spectrum did the tuning. I have a 991.2 Carrera T with Kline headers, Soul cat bypass pipes, and the factory Porsche Sport Exhaust (PSE). The car made 477whp and 536wtq. A gain of 78 whp and 171 ft lbs. Overall, I'm pleased to say the least. The car hits hard down low and pulls strong all the way to 7k.



Damn! That's so impressive! Especially torque numbers! Im arranging to get mine tuned as well. Looking at headers and cats too.
Old 05-17-2019, 07:16 PM
  #94  
Grantsfo
Racer
 
Grantsfo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 498
Received 248 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by afk
100+ hp with a tune .. I dont believe the results.
Heck if I could get 60 HP in a little pee pee 1.6 liter Honda Civic with little dinky single turbo with a flash tune 100 hp in 3.0 L twin turbo Porsh seems low.
Old 05-17-2019, 11:35 PM
  #95  
Sensr215
Instructor
 
Sensr215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ksdaoski
So do you miss the GT3?
Only the sound and at times in the corners. I prefer the power delivery coming from the T. I think my T has close to 200 ft lbs more tq than the GT3, which is crazy to think about.

Originally Posted by Grantsfo
Damn! That's so impressive! Especially torque numbers! Im arranging to get mine tuned as well. Looking at headers and cats too.
Thanks! I imagine you'll get close even with high flow cats.
Old 05-18-2019, 08:06 AM
  #96  
polobai
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
polobai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Jupiter FL
Posts: 2,844
Received 1,124 Likes on 669 Posts
Default

For this who have dyno’d-are you on a bmc filter, or running the stock at this time? I am on stock and on the fence with getting the bmc. Evidently the stock unit flows really well and at $40-50 a pop to replace every 15-20k miles I don’t know that bmc is worth the upgrade at $300...if there was performance to be gained that would be a different story but from what I understand it’s little to none over the stock unit...
Old 05-18-2019, 08:34 AM
  #97  
Rennolazine
Rennlist Member
 
Rennolazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Chitown, USA
Posts: 3,039
Received 758 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by polobai
For this who have dyno’d-are you on a bmc filter, or running the stock at this time? I am on stock and on the fence with getting the bmc. Evidently the stock unit flows really well and at $40-50 a pop to replace every 15-20k miles I don’t know that bmc is worth the upgrade at $300...if there was performance to be gained that would be a different story but from what I understand it’s little to none over the stock unit...
Im running the AMS filter. It enhances sound for sure and the car breathes better. I doubt it adds more than 5-8 hp peak, but sharpens up the car a little and there is a BMC on the marketplace for a decent deal.
Dyno next week. Hoping for 450 hp like you guys but not running Cobb (GIAC) and I still have 200 cell cats.
Old 05-18-2019, 09:09 AM
  #98  
polobai
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
polobai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Jupiter FL
Posts: 2,844
Received 1,124 Likes on 669 Posts
Default

Nice. In for your results-it should do pretty well!
Old 05-18-2019, 01:27 PM
  #99  
Sensr215
Instructor
 
Sensr215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by polobai
For this who have dyno’d-are you on a bmc filter, or running the stock at this time? I am on stock and on the fence with getting the bmc. Evidently the stock unit flows really well and at $40-50 a pop to replace every 15-20k miles I don’t know that bmc is worth the upgrade at $300...if there was performance to be gained that would be a different story but from what I understand it’s little to none over the stock unit...
I am running the stock filter. I'll swap to BMC or AMS when I need a new filter.

Originally Posted by Rennolazine
Im running the AMS filter. It enhances sound for sure and the car breathes better. I doubt it adds more than 5-8 hp peak, but sharpens up the car a little and there is a BMC on the marketplace for a decent deal.
Dyno next week. Hoping for 450 hp like you guys but not running Cobb (GIAC) and I still have 200 cell cats.
Good luck! I hope your jaw drops after the first drive like mine did.
Old 05-19-2019, 08:32 AM
  #100  
Rennolazine
Rennlist Member
 
Rennolazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Chitown, USA
Posts: 3,039
Received 758 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sensr215
I am running the stock filter. I'll swap to BMC or AMS when I need a new filter.



Good luck! I hope your jaw drops after the first drive like mine did.
Definitely dropped to the floor. Its a beast. I got new tires as the p zero cant handle all the torque. When you punch it it rips your face off, especially if you're already pre-spooled in low gears; claws for traction in a straight line in second gear all the way to redline. 100-200 kph its faster than a 2019 panamera turbo and a full second faster than a stock targa 4 gts with pdk (according to the dragy leaderboard). Just with a stage 1 map.
Old 05-22-2019, 11:02 PM
  #101  
Rennolazine
Rennlist Member
 
Rennolazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Chitown, USA
Posts: 3,039
Received 758 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

What tire pressures are u running on the dyno? And did it f@@@k up your tires?
Old 05-22-2019, 11:27 PM
  #102  
groundhog
Race Car
 
groundhog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 3,757
Received 1,018 Likes on 645 Posts
Default

The gains are real but the absolute numbers are meaningless - you're making ~ 400WHP. A good outcome. Be happy.
Old 05-22-2019, 11:34 PM
  #103  
Rennolazine
Rennlist Member
 
Rennolazine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Chitown, USA
Posts: 3,039
Received 758 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

Curious to see how it compares to the mustang dyno over here on Friday. I dont think were gonna see it go as high as these examples. The 60-130s (mid 9s) are nowhere near 500 hp cars even heavier ones. However, they make at least 400 guaranteed, probably a bit more.
Old 05-23-2019, 12:27 PM
  #104  
Sensr215
Instructor
 
Sensr215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rennolazine
What tire pressures are u running on the dyno? And did it f@@@k up your tires?
I had 32F/36R cold for tire pressure. No damage at all from being on the dyno.



Quick Reply: Do you dyno in sport or sport plus-**dyno results inside**



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:46 AM.