When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It may be the future (hope not), but I have never liked the notion that 500lbs of "dirty" batteries built into every car is really much cleaner for the environment. Tesla bill their cars as zero emissions,....clearly that is just not the case.
Couldn't agree more - I mean, what are the emissions of making each of these batteries, and charging them, and in this supposed future where every single car has a massive battery, how will all these get disposed of/recycled?
The 0-60, 0-100, range numbers are legit. Tesla doesn't over-claim the numbers. If any, they underclaim the numbers. They can engineer the battery for even greater power output.
It's the time that it takes to get the cars into production. Tesla always fail to meet production deadline.
Of course Tesla cant handle or corner like Porsche or BMW. If it does, there would be no point to buy BMW or Porsche.
I personally think Internal combustion engines are on it's way out in 10 or 20 years. Nothing can stop the trend towards electrification of cars.
0-60 is still an important measurement. I would care if i spend over 100k and get beat by 2 seconds.
Quarter mile is 8.8 sec. reminds me of first fast and furious movie where Van Diesel mentioned 10-sec car. LOL.
992 might be last generation with full ICE engines . Just my take.
The 0-60, 0-100, range numbers are legit. Tesla doesn't over-claim the numbers. If any, they underclaim the numbers. They can engineer the battery for even greater power output.
Not sure if 0-60 in 1.9s (on street tyres) passes a smell test. That's 1.4g, which means 0-60mph in 25m. Shortest 60-0 braking distances on street tyres are 27-28m, and I don't see why longitudinal acceleration should be asymmetric. Power is not the issue. Slicks and some downforce might do the trick.
We'll see when it actually ships. $250K is out of my price range anyway, so I'm not too terribly concerned about how it will affect me personally. There's room in the world for a variety of directions for the future. Personally I'm glad to see an electric sports car; not yet another sedan or boring commuter-mobile.
But 2020 is awhile away and a lot can happen both in the market and to Tesla during that time. The Model 3 has yet to ship in quantity and there's a whole lot of people they need to satisfy first...
Couldn't agree more - I mean, what are the emissions of making each of these batteries, and charging them, and in this supposed future where every single car has a massive battery, how will all these get disposed of/recycled?
Mining for metals to make engine parts isn't exactly eco-friendly either. What are the emissions for mining all the metal, melting it into castings (a lot of power and heat required), machining, etc. And of course, drilling for oil, refining, transporting, etc. The technology involved to recycle the batteries is well-understood.
I’d say if Bob Lutz says a company is “doing great,” then that company should run in the other direction and change everything they’re doing. I don’t think there was a worse period for any car manufacturer than his years at GM.
Due to begin deliveries in 2020. You need to put down a $50K deposit towards the $200K price unless you want one of the 1st 1000.
For the 1st 1000 the cost is $250K. You pay via a $5K credit card charge with the $245K to follow as a bank wire transfer within 10 days.
Might be interesting to note (according to what I read in Barron's) Tesla is burning $1.5B in cash every quarter and as of September it has just $3.5B of cash ("unrestricted cash") on hand.
$200K let alone $250K is a lot of money to bet Tesla being able to deliver the roadster come 2020.
This is what is uppermost in my mind. Not that it's an electric sports car, I'm all for owning one of those, it's that it's built by Tesla, and they shaved corners on the Model S to the point where it can't handle the thermal load of a full lap. It's not an intrinsic limitation of electric cars, it's Tesla's engineering compromises.
The price is too high, of course. I think I might find myself torn if it were priced in the $100k-$150k range, though I'd still have a nagging doubt about it because of Tesla's build quality issues. It will have one major advantage over the Mission E, the Supercharger network. Porsche is not going to build one of their own, and I don't see them paying Tesla to buy into Tesla's.
As for the many knee-jerk responses in this thread... it's Rennlist. At this point, I've reconciled myself to the idea that this board is ridiculously resistant to change, period.
Agreed. You can’t really fully exploit 0-60 in 1.9 on the street, but the ability to maintain that performance over the course of a track day without meltdown is a big question mark.
Prediction: 50% of Tesla owners die within 30 days of taking delivery.
I hope not. But if the demographic it attracts is not people like us who work on our driving skills, but people who bought it because they are wealthy and want to show off despite having no other high performance car seat time, a lot of them could self-destruct.
The other worry is that pedestrians will not be able to cope with a car that fast and yet virtually silent. Could sneak up on a lot of people.
Agreed. You can’t really fully exploit 0-60 in 1.9 on the street, but the ability to maintain that performance over the course of a track day without meltdown is a big question mark.
I haven’t ridden in one of the hyper speed Tesla’s, but I’ve heard that the sensation of insane acceleration isn’t very gratifying, because (as they put it) unlike a gas engine where you can hear it whilst feel the power come on in a line that isn’t sidewalk flat, EV hyper acceleration feels more like reverse braking. I.e just brutal G forces in the same unpleasant way you feel when stomping on the brakes. Imagine sub 2 seconds.
Theon Goes Full Carbon Fiber With Stunning New Build
Slideshow: Built around a carbon-bodied 964 and a naturally aspirated 4.0-liter flat-six, this bespoke commission highlights how far the restomod formula has evolved.
Tuner Is Converting Porsche 911s Into Shooting Brakes
Slideshow: A Polish Porsche specialist is moving ahead with one of the most unusual 911 conversions in recent memory: a shooting brake version of the 991-generation sports car.
This Coachbuilt Creation Is A Modern Take on the Legendary Porsche 917
Slideshow: A Porsche Carrera GT has been transformed into a one-off coachbuilt machine that blends analog supercar engineering with styling inspired by the legendary 917 race cars.
Is This Convertible Cayenne A Steal, Or A Returnless Investment?
Slideshow: A heavily modified Porsche Cayenne convertible with faux wood trim and a long list of flaws recently sold at auction for surprisingly little money.
Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions
Slideshow: For a company obsessed with engineering precision, Porsche has occasionally named its cars in ways that left even loyal enthusiasts scratching their heads.
Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field
Slideshow: Pogea Racing's latest Porsche 964 project blends carbon-fiber construction, modern chassis upgrades, and up to 500 horsepower while keeping the air-cooled 911 experience firmly analog.