Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dundon 991 GT3/RS Street Header (catted) Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2016, 09:47 AM
  #31  
pete95zhn
Former Vendor
 
pete95zhn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: fortistuning.fi
Posts: 2,279
Received 109 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kobalt
Hi again,

The Porsche Club Sweden measures sound like this:

Standing car
Behind at 45 degrees angle, at the height of the exhaust pipe
RPM: 4500


That would be interesting in my case

(This is done before a trackday to make sure that we don't upset the track owner too much, then there might be other sound measurements being done during the day which might lead to an too early ending of the session anyway.)


And as you mentioned: "Full throttle down the front straight" would be interesting too but it will be less scientific of course...
Hej!

I did measurements for PCF's track day about a week ago. Track has 95 dB limit (or 110 for specific race days) so all about 100 cars had to be measured. 45 deg angle from the end of exhaust pipe at 45 deg angle from the ground, 50 cm away. dB(A) and slow scale @ 4500 rpm. 991 GT3RS did 87db, valves closed.
OTH I also compared actual passing noise with the same instrument...it did 97 dB @ 3rd, floored with valves open, measured 20 meters away. Had to flag away and ask to close valves.
BTW, every other car was quieter at track. From ordinary 991/981 varietes' about 3 dB @ 93-94 to old air cooled'
10-12 dB @ 87-89!
pete95zhn is offline  
Old 08-09-2016, 10:45 AM
  #32  
qbix
Burning Brakes
 
qbix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 753
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pete95zhn
Hej!

I did measurements for PCF's track day about a week ago. Track has 95 dB limit (or 110 for specific race days) so all about 100 cars had to be measured. 45 deg angle from the end of exhaust pipe at 45 deg angle from the ground, 50 cm away. dB(A) and slow scale @ 4500 rpm. 991 GT3RS did 87db, valves closed.
OTH I also compared actual passing noise with the same instrument...it did 97 dB @ 3rd, floored with valves open, measured 20 meters away. Had to flag away and ask to close valves.
BTW, every other car was quieter at track. From ordinary 991/981 varietes' about 3 dB @ 93-94 to old air cooled'
10-12 dB @ 87-89!
You can't just close the valves. They will open anytime you floor it regardless of the position of the switch.
qbix is offline  
Old 08-09-2016, 10:51 AM
  #33  
Kobalt
Race Car
 
Kobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,848
Received 419 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pete95zhn
BTW, every other car was quieter at track.
First: Good info, thanks!

Second: Was the 991 GT3RS louder than the 991 GT3?
Kobalt is offline  
Old 08-09-2016, 11:02 AM
  #34  
pete95zhn
Former Vendor
 
pete95zhn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: fortistuning.fi
Posts: 2,279
Received 109 Likes on 63 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kobalt
First: Good info, thanks!

Second: Was the 991 GT3RS louder than the 991 GT3?
Didn't have any of those then, it was not so advanced's day and RS was one of the instuctor's toy. But 997 GT3 had 93 dB at pass by, 102 stationary.
But, GT4s and 991 C4S were 96-97 stationary and about 3 dB quieter passing by. Conclusions are yours...
pete95zhn is offline  
Old 08-09-2016, 11:44 AM
  #35  
Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Jamie@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa
Posts: 1,954
Received 369 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
Jamie what kind of TCF are you estimating for the 991 GT3 to get rwhp to crank? I have quite a few hours experience on the dynapak 4000 with a 911 with one of the foremost operators here (its a NZ designed and built machine). Hes a rally and race prep shop, old skool, and we were using a 1.09 TCF on a 6 speed G50 with lightweight FWC and pulleys. Curious as to where you guys see the TCF with the PDK-S on the GT3. Looking at your numbers Im thinking 1.15?

P.S. That result is much better than I would have predicted for the cats...great work boys!!
The dyno jet we started on was about 15% loss to factory SAE crank HP specs. The 4000 has more loss than a 2000 and it is set very similarly to the dynojet so our numbers still mean something (at least to us).

The bottom line with any dyno is it's a tool and you have to understand the tool and what data it's telling you!

So far our testing has been shown to be conservative as cars tested on other dynos make more power, this suits us fine!
__________________
Dundon Motorsports
Gig Harbor, WA
253-200-4454
jamie@dundonmotorsports.com

www.dundonmotorsports.com
Facebook.com/dundonmotorsports
Instagram @dundon_motorsports

Last edited by Jamie@dundonmotorsports; 08-09-2016 at 01:06 PM.
Jamie@dundonmotorsports is offline  
Old 08-09-2016, 09:01 PM
  #36  
tonymission
Rennlist Member
 
tonymission's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,159
Received 41 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I'm sure there's been plenty of talk about this kind of thing, but would this setup + tune give PAG a reason to void a warranty (specifically the engine issue)? Obviously the answer is technically yes, but I guess more of what is the precedent here? Are guys removing the setup prior to major warranty work? I know with my RS7 tuning, we have to re-flash the car back to stock before any service to avoid the car being flagged "TD1". I went stage 2 on that car because there really hadn't been any public issues, but if we're driving ticking time bombs here my thoughts might be a little different.

Pay to play and all that, but it seems to be a 'when' issue here and not 'if'.
tonymission is offline  
Old 08-09-2016, 09:09 PM
  #37  
Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Jamie@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa
Posts: 1,954
Received 369 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tonymission
I'm sure there's been plenty of talk about this kind of thing, but would this setup + tune give PAG a reason to void a warranty (specifically the engine issue)? Obviously the answer is technically yes, but I guess more of what is the precedent here? Are guys removing the setup prior to major warranty work? I know with my RS7 tuning, we have to re-flash the car back to stock before any service to avoid the car being flagged "TD1". I went stage 2 on that car because there really hadn't been any public issues, but if we're driving ticking time bombs here my thoughts might be a little different.

Pay to play and all that, but it seems to be a 'when' issue here and not 'if'.
What we've gotten from most dealers is exhausts are not an issue, tunes make them a little nervous.

So this is why 90% of our customers do just the exhaust and no tune, and another reason why it was important to us to get as much power as we can with the stock ECU. Tuning allows a greater flexibility in crafting the power.

Porsche is pretty good about known issues with engines (like the cam finger follower wear issues for example) and not giving owners a hassle about modifications to the car being the cause of them.

In the end it comes down to the relationship you have with your service advisor manager, good to check with them if you're at all concerned.

The alternative is to do what you do now and just swap it back out if they're a bit tight about it...
Jamie@dundonmotorsports is offline  
Old 08-09-2016, 09:15 PM
  #38  
tonymission
Rennlist Member
 
tonymission's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,159
Received 41 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie@dundonmotorsports
What we've gotten from most dealers is exhausts are not an issue, tunes make them a little nervous. So this is why 90% of our customers do just the exhaust and no tune, and another reason why it was important to us to get as much power as we can with the stock ECU. Tuning allows a greater flexibility in crafting the power. Porsche is pretty good about known issues with engines (like the cam finger follower wear issues for example) and not giving owners a hassle about modifications to the car being the cause of them. In the end it comes down to the relationship you have with your service advisor manager, good to check with them if you're at all concerned. The alternative is to do what you do now and just swap it back out if they're a bit tight about it...
Thanks for the quick response! That makes total sense and they did say exhausts were OK, but I didn't know if that extended to a full header setup. Salesmen seem to be a little more "oh yeah, of course that's fine" than maybe the official stance is. I'll poke around a little more, get to know some of the local guys here in Atlanta and figure out what everyone else is doing. ECU modifications almost always draw pause regardless of the car and/or dealership, but I'd love to unleash a little more of the beast and it seems like you guys have a great product and really know what you're doing.
tonymission is offline  
Old 08-09-2016, 09:18 PM
  #39  
Jamie@dundonmotorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Jamie@dundonmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Gig Harbor, Wa
Posts: 1,954
Received 369 Likes on 204 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tonymission
Thanks for the quick response! That makes total sense and they did say exhausts were OK, but I didn't know if that extended to a full header setup. Salesmen seem to be a little more "oh yeah, of course that's fine" than maybe the official stance is. I'll poke around a little more, get to know some of the local guys here in Atlanta and figure out what everyone else is doing. ECU modifications almost always draw pause regardless of the car and/or dealership, but I'd love to unleash a little more of the beast and it seems like you guys have a great product and really know what you're doing.

At my local dealer here in Washington state, the techs and service manager were oogling the header design, were revving the car for the sound in the service bay and fighting with each other over who was going to do the test drive (service manager and lead tech both went). This was for a few coils that went bad and they had no issue warrantying them.

I can't say the local dealer is the norm, but they were really cool about it and genuinely excited to see a well crafted product on the car...
Jamie@dundonmotorsports is offline  
Old 08-09-2016, 09:34 PM
  #40  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

My understanding (here) if its bolt on and its not touching the factory ECU code then it will get by just fine. Its different for different markets of course. The issue with a flashed ECU is that it leaves traces that it has been over written, and to be fair to PAG once someone has started to change the parameters they have chosen to operate the engine then all bets should be off. An alternative that DMS offer is a complete replacement flashed replacement ECU. Its a good option but not within my budget.

The extra power made from the ECU tune over the straight headers was nominal in my opinion for the additional cost and hassle. Sure if you have the CEL light issue after the exhaust is fitted (rare and doesn't seem to be an issue at all on ROW cars like my own) then that may warrant considering it, however for an extra 10 bhp and a few lbft it wasnt a big USP for me personally.

Better yet for customers concerned about CEL or passing emissions in countries or states where this is a potential issue then the new catted 991 GT3 headers are a great alternative and they make basically the same power in any case! Better still if you "upgrade" to the 991 RS or 911R then you can take them with you and Im sure there will be no shortage of takers on the secondary market later on should you decide to try a different marque or vehicle all together...
Macca is offline  



Quick Reply: Dundon 991 GT3/RS Street Header (catted) Update



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:27 AM.