Bringing Sanity to the Rumor Mill: Source Classification System
12-15-2015, 08:40 PM
#16
Burning Brakes
12-15-2015, 09:52 PM
#18
How do I know you're not just a creative Porsche marketer trying to up the game?
12-16-2015, 12:20 AM
#21
Drifting
12-16-2015, 01:05 AM
#23
Race Director
Thread Starter
12-16-2015, 01:23 AM
#24
Rennlist Member
What CALEXIO is proposing stems from medical literature (at least that's how I know it). When classifying strength of evidence, level 1 is the strongest and with higher numbers it decreases. Level 1 and 2 tend to become standard of care, because of its strong supporting evidence.
12-16-2015, 01:32 AM
#25
Rennlist Member
Fascinating. So information received from a level 6 source that was a 2 in accuracy would have you wondering if you were being double played? :-)
12-16-2015, 02:31 AM
#26
Race Director
Thread Starter
What CALEXIO is proposing stems from medical literature (at least that's how I know it). When classifying strength of evidence, level 1 is the strongest and with higher numbers it decreases. Level 1 and 2 tend to become standard of care, because of its strong supporting evidence.
12-16-2015, 04:38 AM
#27
Advanced
bingo! Level 1 data in medicine is of the highest quality, subjectivity is removed, it's peer reviewed, it's solid, that was the inspiration behind this idea. But either way.. 1-5 or 5-1.. If we only self-graded our "facts" to some extent with an objective criteria-driven information/rumor classification system.. then maybe things wouldn't get so convoluted. We could build on information rather than having well-supported conclusions get flicked into oblivion the minute someone comes along with their latest fascination. Unfortunately egos come into play and all of a sudden everyone knows the cleaning lady.
12-16-2015, 09:09 AM
#28
Race Car
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,484
Received 436 Likes
on
262 Posts
Intelligence definition doesn t seem to belong to a strict classification of information schema
which btw is first not applied by the pretenders...
Intelligence is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings—"catching on," "making sense" of things, or "figuring out"
which in this list is totally missing in the schema
or vice-versa there are phenomenas that can t be caught by this steryl and stereotypied list
ooh doing everyday the same things it helps for sure
which btw is first not applied by the pretenders...
Intelligence is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings—"catching on," "making sense" of things, or "figuring out"
which in this list is totally missing in the schema
or vice-versa there are phenomenas that can t be caught by this steryl and stereotypied list
ooh doing everyday the same things it helps for sure
12-16-2015, 09:21 AM
#29
Rennlist Member
Intelligence definition doesn t seem to belong to a strict classification of information schema
which btw is first not applied by the pretenders...
Intelligence is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings—"catching on," "making sense" of things, or "figuring out"
which in this list is totally missing in the schema
or vice-versa there are phenomenas that can t be caught by this steryl and stereotypied list
ooh doing everyday the same things it helps for sure
which btw is first not applied by the pretenders...
Intelligence is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings—"catching on," "making sense" of things, or "figuring out"
which in this list is totally missing in the schema
or vice-versa there are phenomenas that can t be caught by this steryl and stereotypied list
ooh doing everyday the same things it helps for sure
I cant make out your first line but not knowing where you are located it could be that English is also not your first language.
Maybe that's why you grab stuff from Wiki when you try and explain your trolls.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainst...n_Intelligence
It is not merely book-learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings "catching on," "making sense" of things, or "figuring out" what to do.
Ill play along; its a quiet morning at the office.
12-16-2015, 09:45 AM
#30
Race Car
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,484
Received 436 Likes
on
262 Posts
Exactly but make sense that s the point regardless the source
Intelligence is the art to figure out if this make sense in english
or correlate things apparently not related if you like to hear my definition
Using a strict list equals you figure out in a limited way not catching on most of the reality
which indeed is useful for a profession where to have to produce daily tangible results
not for figuring out!
Intelligence is the art to figure out if this make sense in english
or correlate things apparently not related if you like to hear my definition
Using a strict list equals you figure out in a limited way not catching on most of the reality
which indeed is useful for a profession where to have to produce daily tangible results
not for figuring out!