Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 GT3 Sportauto Supertest - DISAPPOINTMENT!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2013, 11:23 AM
  #151  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,654
Received 955 Likes on 552 Posts
Default

I find it very very hard to believe that Porsche would allow sportauto to get an unhealthy car, review the results, and then allow them to publish the results.
Old 10-27-2013, 01:24 PM
  #152  
TT Surgeon
Race Director
 
TT Surgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: KC ex pat marooned in NY
Posts: 13,005
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Riz
Teething problems are going to be there. It is an essentially untested engine in endurance racing. PDK S is new, RWS is new. The early test cars they provided were probably ringers anyway. This is probably an actual production model ready for delivery. The 3.6, 3.8, and the 4.0 Mezger engined cars are legendary for many reasons.
OT but I just sold my 2011 Turbo S but kept my 09 Turbo because it has the Mezger engine, no PDK, and above all no PTV. I could not stand PTV most of all.
I also unloaded my 2011tts for the same reason, I found the ptv very unsettling on the track, very noticeable.
I'm also concerned that this was a real car, not a ringer with an immediate track issue. What happens to the rest of us when we get this code at a track day, does it create warranty issues with track use.
Old 10-27-2013, 09:29 PM
  #153  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShakeNBake
I find it very very hard to believe that Porsche would allow sportauto to get an unhealthy car, review the results, and then allow them to publish the results.
But they didn't did they! As mentioned in the German article the dyno tests couldn't be completed up to factory cut off RPM due to an ECU fault that Porsche had to re flash!
Old 10-27-2013, 09:41 PM
  #154  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,654
Received 955 Likes on 552 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
But they didn't did they! As mentioned in the German article the dyno tests couldn't be completed up to factory cut off RPM due to an ECU fault that Porsche had to re flash!
Lots of cars have the same issue on a 2 wheel dyno. Early E9X M3 had the same issue for a while. My E46 would not dyno until it was flashed either. Pretty common.
Old 10-27-2013, 09:54 PM
  #155  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I didnt realize that. Ive done around 10-12 hours on dyno and spent some time with the Dynapak and never had that issue. Maybe its modern cars due to electronics?
Old 10-27-2013, 10:06 PM
  #156  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,654
Received 955 Likes on 552 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
I didnt realize that. Ive done around 10-12 hours on dyno and spent some time with the Dynapak and never had that issue. Maybe its modern cars due to electronics?
I think it's just adding the "feature". Not a priority until people start dynoing the cars.
Old 10-27-2013, 10:49 PM
  #157  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

That's strange. Looking at the trace it goes to 7500 rpm only. Not sure what system would tell it to turn off at that stage. Must be some form of protection. Maybe something to do with the PDK-S. the PDK-S will not allow revs to exceed 4500 rpm when the car is in neutral for example...
Old 10-28-2013, 03:17 AM
  #158  
sunnyr
Three Wheelin'
 
sunnyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,368
Received 131 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Macca
That's strange. Looking at the trace it goes to 7500 rpm only. Not sure what system would tell it to turn off at that stage. Must be some form of protection. Maybe something to do with the PDK-S. the PDK-S will not allow revs to exceed 4500 rpm when the car is in neutral for example...
When Motortrend recently dynoed the F10 M5, they had to test it on a AWD dyno though the car is RWD, cause if the difference in the speeds between rear and front wheel would exceed a certain limit (100mph?), the ECU would shut the engine down. Maybe Porsche uses something similar.
From 4:30 -
Old 10-28-2013, 03:22 AM
  #159  
Macca
Rennlist Member
 
Macca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 14,140
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Very interesting. thanks for that Sunnyr. No idea why they do this but interesting to know...
Old 10-28-2013, 03:57 AM
  #160  
MarcusG
Rennlist Member
 
MarcusG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Newport Beach
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 261 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Unhealthy is not a great word but my boss used it quite often at BMW. I shouldn't have used that word. I just remember that with a fleet of completely identical optioned cars, there were always some that are stronger than others.

You never know. There's so much to go wrong a perfectly operating car can develop issues very quickly at the hands of journalists. I used to see it first hand. If you've never been at a magazine test you should try to see one first hand and how nerve wracking it it is. All you do the entire time is pray nothing goes wrong with the journalists ripping on the cars.
Old 10-28-2013, 08:35 AM
  #161  
CaymanR-Racer
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
CaymanR-Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The car already had that problem on the way to the dyno (on the road) ... so it wasnt a problem that was caused by being on the roll ...

But i still dont understand the suspension settings... even compared to the C2S car that was tested they seem far too "conservative", even though the C2S was on "Max Performace Summer" tires ... I mean, can cup tires actually work with these numbers?? (all in degree+ min not decimals)

-----------------------------------------------991 GT3-------------------991C2S
toe front:------------------------------------ +0°06' -------------------- -0°15'
caster front:-------------------------------- +9°06' -------------------- +7°49'
camber front:------------------------------- -1°35' --------------------- -1°53'
toe rear:----------------------------------- +0°12' -------------------- +0°05'
camber rear:------------------------------- -1°23' --------------------- -2°26'
Old 10-28-2013, 12:36 PM
  #162  
-eztrader-
Rennlist Member
 
-eztrader-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,942
Received 252 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

bmw losing a handling and feel comparison to mercedes? wow - bmw M has really lost their focus.
Old 10-28-2013, 02:45 PM
  #163  
MarcusG
Rennlist Member
 
MarcusG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Newport Beach
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 261 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CaymanR-Racer
The car already had that problem on the way to the dyno (on the road) ... so it wasnt a problem that was caused by being on the roll ...

But i still dont understand the suspension settings... even compared to the C2S car that was tested they seem far too "conservative", even though the C2S was on "Max Performace Summer" tires ... I mean, can cup tires actually work with these numbers?? (all in degree+ min not decimals)

-----------------------------------------------991 GT3-------------------991C2S
toe front:------------------------------------ +0°06' -------------------- -0°15'
caster front:-------------------------------- +9°06' -------------------- +7°49'
camber front:------------------------------- -1°35' --------------------- -1°53'
toe rear:----------------------------------- +0°12' -------------------- +0°05'
camber rear:------------------------------- -1°23' --------------------- -2°26'


Well than that settles it. Porsche sent them a hurt car.
Old 10-28-2013, 03:00 PM
  #164  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,654
Received 955 Likes on 552 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -eztrader-
bmw losing a handling and feel comparison to mercedes? wow - bmw M has really lost their focus.
yep...it's come down to that, not to mention BMW doesn't have a performance halo car to convince me that it even knows how to do it anymore.
Old 10-28-2013, 03:11 PM
  #165  
Daniel L
Instructor
 
Daniel L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 107
Received 47 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Wow, I stopped keeping track of AMG cars. I had no idea the E63 switched to AWD and twin turbo. 541 HP to the wheels in an AWD car is ridiculous.


Quick Reply: 991 GT3 Sportauto Supertest - DISAPPOINTMENT!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:46 PM.