Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

987.2 Race Package Phase 1-Race Headers and Tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2016, 08:51 AM
  #31  
John@Fabspeed
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
John@Fabspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Washington, Pa
Posts: 4,717
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JP66
Hi John,

Joe from NY here. Great thread and thanks for bringing ti to my attention! I had read it before, but forgot all about it. Just one quick question:

If I need to pass NY State emissions every year and not trigger noise limits at Lime Rock Park, what combination is possible and or recommended for the maximum "bang for the buck" if I am purely interested in power increases and not concerned about sound?

Thanks a bunch!

Joe
Hey Joe!

The biggest restriction point in regards to power on these cars is in the headers, and the most power in the curve relevant to benefit track use requires going catless.

There is also some great power potential in upgrading the TB/Plenum, and was chatting with A432 about how much of an improvement he saw with this on his CR. I also drove a local client's 987.2 Cayman S with this equipped and it has a marked improvement in the low/mid range. That will be my next upgrade. Would also recommend the Desnorkel mod to keep the intake temperatures lower during track use if you haven't already done so, and our Vflow or Competition Intake to help air flow in.

That being said, catless is louder than catted and does pose a risk for decibel limited tracks like Limerock, however I have GT4 client running our Race Headers, Maxflo Exhaust, and our Turndown Tips and he passed Limerock by 2 DB last year. You should be within a safe sound range with the same setup albeit with factory mufflers, or with our Maxflo exhaust if you'd like to additionally get a bit more power out of the catback system as well.

Another great improvement in performance, throttle response, and power delivery is a custom protune. This also doubles as a solution to your emissions test. Our tuner can tweak the ECU software to set readiness monitors even without cats to help go through the computer portion of the test, although you'd have to find someone a flexible (or lazy) to not look for the cats under the car. Worst case scenario, the headers are a breeze to switch out. Takes at most two hours and is staring you in the face once you get the car in the air. The time spent to switch back to factory once a year to pass emissions is a small price to pay for the benefits on track.

Give me a ring today when you have a chance (215 646 4945 ext. 101), I would love to chat more in depth about everything so you can make an educated decision moving forward. We can also make some plans to hit the track together
__________________
Porsche Performance Specialist
John@Fabspeed.com
215-618-9796

Fabspeed Motorsport USA
155 Commerce Drive Fort Washington, PA 19034
www.Fabspeed.com


John@Fabspeed is offline  
Old 11-01-2016, 02:03 PM
  #32  
jmcc42uk
4th Gear
 
jmcc42uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey, What about the drone with catless header setup?

How much does it drone with PSE valves open/closed?

Thanks

Jon
jmcc42uk is offline  
Old 11-01-2016, 04:04 PM
  #33  
John@Fabspeed
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
John@Fabspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Washington, Pa
Posts: 4,717
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jmcc42uk
Hey, What about the drone with catless header setup?

How much does it drone with PSE valves open/closed?

Thanks

Jon
Hello Jon,

I could notice no drone at all with valves closed. Valves open you could hear some exhaust noise but i wouldn't call it drone exactly. Either was it was perfectly comfortable in both modes of PSE, but valves closed particularly sounded just like factory. Here is a video in cabin, you can hear how remarkably quiet it gets when I close the valves between 1:50 and 3:45.

John@Fabspeed is offline  
Old 11-17-2016, 12:44 PM
  #34  
John@Fabspeed
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
John@Fabspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Washington, Pa
Posts: 4,717
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Phase Two Complete! And it is AWESOME haha


John@Fabspeed is offline  
Old 11-17-2016, 12:53 PM
  #35  
Illini675
Instructor
 
Illini675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Sounds mean John! Definitely interested to see the before / after dyno results of adding the IPD plenum and throttle body to this package. I wonder what the incremental gains will be considering the IPD claims of 20 hp / 15 tq on a car with exhaust modifications. Is that still the plan? A net 50whp gain over stock with the race header / catback / IPD would be insane!
Illini675 is offline  
Old 11-17-2016, 01:07 PM
  #36  
John@Fabspeed
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
John@Fabspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Washington, Pa
Posts: 4,717
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Illini675
Sounds mean John! Definitely interested to see the before / after dyno results of adding the IPD plenum and throttle body to this package. I wonder what the incremental gains will be considering the IPD claims of 20 hp / 15 tq on a car with exhaust modifications. Is that still the plan? A net 50whp gain over stock with the race header / catback / IPD would be insane!
Here is the Phase 2 I just did, only added the catback. Picked up 6-7whp on the dyno over the Cayman R PSE with the larger inlet pipes, and definitely pulls much harder in the top end.

https://rennlist.com/forums/987-981-...st-system.html

IPD Plenum/TB, Desnorkel Mod, and Intake is next on the list!

50whp is not possible on this car FYI haha. 40whp would be a stretch but just might be possible, what really matters is maximizing the performance under the curve
John@Fabspeed is offline  
Old 11-17-2016, 01:15 PM
  #37  
Illini675
Instructor
 
Illini675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Fabspeed Motorsport
Here is the Phase 2 I just did, only added the catback. Picked up 6-7whp on the dyno over the Cayman R PSE with the larger inlet pipes, and definitely pulls much harder in the top end.

https://rennlist.com/forums/987-981-...st-system.html

IPD Plenum/TB, Desnorkel Mod, and Intake is next on the list!

50whp is not possible on this car FYI haha. 40whp would be a stretch but just might be possible, what really matters is maximizing the performance under the curve
Hey, just doing some claimed-gain math... 27 whp with race headers according to your dyno, another 6 whp with the catback... leaves only 17 hp left to reach 50 If IPD's claims are true in the 15-20 hp gain, you're there, right? Of course I understand that area under the curve is what really moves the needle in terms of usable performance. Regardless, it will be interesting to see the final results.
Illini675 is offline  
Old 11-17-2016, 01:21 PM
  #38  
John@Fabspeed
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
John@Fabspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Washington, Pa
Posts: 4,717
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Illini675
Hey, just doing some claimed-gain math... 27 whp with race headers according to your dyno, another 6 whp with the catback... leaves only 17 hp left to reach 50 If IPD's claims are true in the 15-20 hp gain, you're there, right? Of course I understand that area under the curve is what really moves the needle in terms of usable performance. Regardless, it will be interesting to see the final results.
Its not gaining 17hp lol. However, I have driven a 987.2 CS back to back with my CR with the same mods but his with the plenum/TB package...WAY better responsiveness throughout the curve and the top end was much improved. Worth every penny regardless of what the dyno ends up showing.

How are things going with your car?
John@Fabspeed is offline  
Old 11-17-2016, 01:29 PM
  #39  
Illini675
Instructor
 
Illini675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Fabspeed Motorsport
Its not gaining 17hp lol. However, I have driven a 987.2 CS back to back with my CR with the same mods but his with the plenum/TB package...WAY better responsiveness throughout the curve and the top end was much improved. Worth every penny regardless of what the dyno ends up showing.

How are things going with your car?
Good to know, thanks as always for the input!

Things are going well, thanks for asking! Still absolutely loving the race headers. I installed the latest tune from Steve trying to tune out the cat codes, but haven't yet had an opportunity to put any miles on it due to business travel this last week... Fingers crossed for when I get back! Has it been solved for your car?
Illini675 is offline  
Old 11-18-2016, 10:29 AM
  #40  
John@Fabspeed
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
John@Fabspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Washington, Pa
Posts: 4,717
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Illini675
Good to know, thanks as always for the input!

Things are going well, thanks for asking! Still absolutely loving the race headers. I installed the latest tune from Steve trying to tune out the cat codes, but haven't yet had an opportunity to put any miles on it due to business travel this last week... Fingers crossed for when I get back! Has it been solved for your car?
Anytime my friend

Glad you're enjoying the headers! I haven't had any CEL with the new file myself, although i've been beating it to death the last thousand miles so not normal driving conditions haha
John@Fabspeed is offline  
Old 11-20-2016, 08:05 AM
  #41  
turbo8765
Instructor
 
turbo8765's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 180
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Can you run the car at a quarter mile drag strip?

Trap speed would be the best indicator of the what mods have done for the car.

Would love to see what it can do.
turbo8765 is offline  
Old 11-20-2016, 01:24 PM
  #42  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 807 Likes on 469 Posts
Default

For those of you that have installed sport or race headers, have you noted any reduction in torque at the lower RPM's? I'm not talking actual torque curves, primarily how the car feels when taking off.
Marine Blue is offline  
Old 11-20-2016, 03:09 PM
  #43  
Cman21
Instructor
 
Cman21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Georgia
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I have 200 cat cell headers on my car with a factory PSE exhaust. The torque is stronger in all ranges .

Cman21
Cman21 is offline  
Old 11-20-2016, 03:13 PM
  #44  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 807 Likes on 469 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cman21
I have 200 cat cell headers on my car with a factory PSE exhaust. The torque is stronger in all ranges .

Cman21
Thank you for this feedback!
Marine Blue is offline  
Old 11-21-2016, 10:08 AM
  #45  
Illini675
Instructor
 
Illini675's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Catless race headers here- I would agree that the torque is noticeably improved in all ranges. Definitely no feeling of torque loss when taking off from a standstill.
Illini675 is offline  


Quick Reply: 987.2 Race Package Phase 1-Race Headers and Tune



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:27 PM.