Notices
981 Forum Discussions of the 3rd Gen Boxster and 2nd Gen Cayman (2012-2016)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Base vs S for frequent track use

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2022, 06:13 PM
  #1  
alexxs
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
alexxs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 28
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default Base vs S for frequent track use

Hi,

As per the title I'm looking at either a 981 base or S. It will officially be my wife's car, but her road mileage will probably equate to what I put on the car while tracking it. It's going to be a PDK box, but other than that I'm lost trying to decide between the two.

I've read everything I could find on the subject , but it seems my use case is so specific that all the threads I found are a bit off. Mainly because traditionally a track car gets heavily modded, while I want to keep this as close to stock as possible. I'm currently signing out of a turbo miata and I definitely don't want the whole track car maintenance routine. There's also the added twist that, in my country, the annual tax on the S is about double compared to the base. Around 500$ for the base vs 1100$ for the S.

PS: It's going to be a PDK with sport chrono. I don't think any other options are a must have, but happy to reconsider.

PPS: My daily is a W205 C63s, so I'm kinda already doing the V8 turbo muscle car dance, but at the same time a bit worried that the 265hp in the base are going to feel slow. My current miata turbo runs 240hp and feels really lively. If the Cayman can deliver the same kind of power dynamic when accelerating, I'm more than happy with it

Thanks!

Last edited by alexxs; 02-18-2022 at 06:14 PM.
Old 02-18-2022, 06:44 PM
  #2  
Kitc2246
Three Wheelin'
 
Kitc2246's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Mechanicsburg pa
Posts: 1,663
Received 477 Likes on 347 Posts
Default

Started tracking with an 09 Boxster PDK Bought a 2013 BS PDK in Nov 2019. I added adjustable LCAs to the 09 and also the 2013. The amount of negative camber without adjustable LCAs or camber plates is limited. You will quickly wear the outside left of the front tire with additional negative camber. I added the third radiator. Solid Sebro slotted rotors, racing brake fluid and track pads IMO are a must. I bought a set of 18" wheels and Hankook RS4s from Tire Rack. Michelin PS4S are good enough to begin with. There is definitely a HP difference between the base and the S. The base is no slug. There will always be someone with more HP, a GT4 or 911 Turbo.

You will pay a premium, but a GTS includes a third radiator, SC, PASM and other goodies. PTV is a popular option. X73 is the sport suspension that is a no cost substitute for PASM
The following users liked this post:
alexxs (02-22-2022)
Old 02-18-2022, 06:46 PM
  #3  
edmaverik
Instructor
 
edmaverik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 142
Received 60 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

S for the track would be ideal.
The following 2 users liked this post by edmaverik:
alexxs (02-22-2022), Diamond Dave (02-19-2022)
Old 02-18-2022, 08:13 PM
  #4  
Mark Dreyer
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Mark Dreyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 4,963
Received 662 Likes on 357 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by edmaverik
S for the track would be ideal.
Agreed. It won’t matter if you are just getting into the hobby, but as your progress and get in faster run groups, you want as much hp as possible on most tracks. So many GT cars out there nowadays in advanced run groups. The more performance you can have in your car the better off you’ll be. On some tracks slower hp car can hold it’s own with higher hp cars, with the driver variable being equal. I drive one such track, Roebling Raceway for instance. So if you were going to mostly drive a track like that, the base car may be adequate.
The following users liked this post:
alexxs (02-22-2022)
Old 02-19-2022, 12:04 AM
  #5  
txbdan
Pro
 
txbdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: MA
Posts: 577
Received 172 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

A base Cayman will feel slower than the Miata because it delivers power much more linearly and won't have the turbo torque push. Even an S might feel unless youre wringing it out 5krpm+.

You don't HAVE to do anything. It's a Porsche, tire it and fire it.
The following users liked this post:
alexxs (02-22-2022)
Old 02-19-2022, 02:57 AM
  #6  
vicrc
Advanced
 
vicrc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 71
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

If you boosted a Miata, you will want an S for sure!
The following 2 users liked this post by vicrc:
alexxs (02-22-2022), Diamond Dave (02-19-2022)
Old 02-19-2022, 09:20 AM
  #7  
CarAholic
Rennlist Member
 
CarAholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
Received 186 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

You will have a blast for both but if it must be PDK then for me it's the S no question. The base is more fun in a manual due to its shorter gearing over the S.
The following 2 users liked this post by CarAholic:
alexxs (02-22-2022), Diamond Dave (02-19-2022)
Old 02-22-2022, 09:06 AM
  #8  
alexxs
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
alexxs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 28
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Thanks all! Prices are crazy over in Europe, essentially a 981 CS only lost like 10% of its value in 10 years. Incredible. As a side note I bought my C63s last year with a 50% depreciation with just 20 000 miles and just 2 years from first registration.

I'll definitely be looking for an S model, also considering the 718s, I don't think I would mind the 4-cylinder on the track and the newer tech should make it more pleasant for my wife as well.

Old 02-22-2022, 09:31 AM
  #9  
alexxs
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
alexxs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 28
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by txbdan

You don't HAVE to do anything. It's a Porsche, tire it and fire it.
This is exactly why I want a Porsche. I'm tired of fixing stuff on the Miata. They're reliable cars for what performance you get out of them, but I really want a car that can do both light track days (just getting back into the hobby) and function as a car to do some groceries, go out for food etc.
Old 02-22-2022, 12:39 PM
  #10  
txbdan
Pro
 
txbdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: MA
Posts: 577
Received 172 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexxs
Thanks all! Prices are crazy over in Europe, essentially a 981 CS only lost like 10% of its value in 10 years. Incredible. As a side note I bought my C63s last year with a 50% depreciation with just 20 000 miles and just 2 years from first registration.

I'll definitely be looking for an S model, also considering the 718s, I don't think I would mind the 4-cylinder on the track and the newer tech should make it more pleasant for my wife as well.
A 718 base would be a great option. They have a lot more torque and most reviews say they're a little tighter and more raw than the 981 stock. The base has a lot of power compared to the base 981. They're probably a great value since since the four bangers are poo poo'ed by the Porsche religious.
The following users liked this post:
maschinetheist (02-22-2022)
Old 03-02-2022, 02:46 AM
  #11  
alexxs
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
alexxs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 28
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

So I have my first two candidates. I can buy the first at the net price.

Candidate 1: https://m.mobile.de/fahrzeuge/detail...ShareExtension

The things that would put me off are the lack of a sport exhaust and the steering wheel shifter buttons.

Candidate 2:
https://m.mobile.de/fahrzeuge/detail...ShareExtension

Quite a high mileage. No sport chrono. Is there any way around the milder shift mapping on the pdk?
Old 03-02-2022, 10:15 AM
  #12  
txbdan
Pro
 
txbdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: MA
Posts: 577
Received 172 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Sport Chrono is a must-have for a tracked car, especially if its a PDK.

As discussed, PSE and the steering wheel can be added/replaced, just a matter of money.
Old 03-02-2022, 12:50 PM
  #13  
MMaynard
Advanced
 
MMaynard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Cedar Park Texas
Posts: 78
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexxs
Thanks all! Prices are crazy over in Europe, essentially a 981 CS only lost like 10% of its value in 10 years. Incredible. As a side note I bought my C63s last year with a 50% depreciation with just 20 000 miles and just 2 years from first registration.

I'll definitely be looking for an S model, also considering the 718s, I don't think I would mind the 4-cylinder on the track and the newer tech should make it more pleasant for my wife as well.
To bad you are not in US I have a car for sale I think you would like.
https://rennlist.com/forums/market/1291134
The following users liked this post:
alexxs (03-09-2022)
Old 03-02-2022, 02:28 PM
  #14  
9eight7
Pro
 
9eight7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 726
Received 258 Likes on 182 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by txbdan
Sport Chrono is a must-have for a tracked car, especially if its a PDK.

As discussed, PSE and the steering wheel can be added/replaced, just a matter of money.
I agree, Sport Chrono is a must with PDK. The rest can be added later and be done DIY (I think there was a thread where someone added Sport Chrono to their 981, however it was an arduous process).

I vote for the S if there are long straights at your tracks and your buddies have fast cars.
Old 03-02-2022, 03:34 PM
  #15  
bjo71
Track Day
 
bjo71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexxs
This is exactly why I want a Porsche. I'm tired of fixing stuff on the Miata. They're reliable cars for what performance you get out of them, but I really want a car that can do both light track days (just getting back into the hobby) and function as a car to do some groceries, go out for food etc.
Your thinking is why I sold my M3 for my Cayman S. I wanted a nice car to go out in and then still have fun at the track.


Quick Reply: Base vs S for frequent track use



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:17 PM.