Notices
968 Forum 1992-1995

More fun than a 944T?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2003, 09:35 PM
  #1  
fluid15
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
fluid15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 965
Received 50 Likes on 34 Posts
Post More fun than a 944T?

I'm not trying to stir the mud here - but how does the 968 compare overall to a 944 Turbo? I've been to several PCA events but haven't come across anyone who owned both. And how about the track? Is a 968 a step up from a 944 Turbo S (both unmodified)?
Old 06-06-2003, 11:48 PM
  #2  
Abby Normal
In Your Face, Ace
Rennlist Member

 
Abby Normal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,120
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Post

Ironic you bring this up. Today I drove 450 miles round trip to see and drive a '86 Turbo 5spd with 52,xxx miles on it. Red/w blk interior. Car is in excellent condition EVERYTHING worked, except the cable for the hatch release was broke. He even has the air pump, tool kit window sticker everything. Car is in 97% perfect condition.

Tomorrow or Sunday I am going to see and drive a '93 968 Tiptronic with 93,xxx miles on it. Amazon Green with light gray leather, turbo twist wheels. This cars asking price is $2500 more than the price I have settled with the owner of the Turbo.. there is always room for negotiation, right?

The Turbo is so very clean and correct I may not be able to pass it up but will be going to see the 968, I'll let you know what I decide and answer your question.

It's sure a buyers market right now for p-cars!
Old 06-07-2003, 11:50 AM
  #3  
Damian in NJ
Race Director
 
Damian in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,195
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

Unmodified the 968 is a better car. The slight acceleration edge to the turbo is negated in real life by the bigger torque of the 968 and the six speed gearbox. Fit and finish are better, as the 968 was built at Porsche and not at Audi.

That said, with slight tuning mods you can get a big hp gain over a 968 on a 951. There is almost nothing you can do short of forced induction on a 968 to get any measurable increase in power.

Styling is a matter of personal preference; although the 951 variants are rare in their own way, they all look similar to any of the 944 variants-which were built in numbers 10X or more than that of the 968. People come up to me all the time and ask if my cab is a new Porsche model-you won't find that with a 951.

Each has durability bugaboos-the pinion problem is oft discussed, but the actual percentage of cars with it are small-no consolation if your car is one of them. Steering racks, water pumps, motor mounts, are seemingly less of a problem on the 968 in turn. You pay your money and take your chance.
Old 06-07-2003, 04:46 PM
  #4  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

The 968 is the car to get if you want a clean, sunday drive car, or even a reliable daily driver.

Get the 951 if you want a car you can mod the **** out of. If you find a decent 951, for a good price, you can turn it into a 360+HP beast for less than a very clean 968.
Old 06-08-2003, 10:54 AM
  #5  
special tool
Banned
 
special tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: limbo....
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

A stock turbo "S" will significantly outperform a stock 968 - especially above 100 mph.

<img border="0" alt="[bigbye]" title="" src="graemlins/xyxwave.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
Old 06-10-2003, 04:06 AM
  #6  
danny951
Three Wheelin'
 
danny951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

BUT.... will it outperform a supercharged 968???

<img border="0" alt="[jumper]" title="" src="graemlins/jumper.gif" />
Old 06-10-2003, 01:14 PM
  #7  
Damian in NJ
Race Director
 
Damian in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,195
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

'Significantly outperform a 968 . . .' I've never seen 100-150 data to show that.
Don't forget, aero will enter into that area too, and the 968 has less drag and an extra gear as well.
Old 06-10-2003, 03:42 PM
  #8  
PorscheG96
Race Car
 
PorscheG96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: $F Bay Area
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by special tool:
<strong>A stock turbo "S" will significantly outperform a stock 968 - especially above 100 mph.

<img border="0" alt="[bigbye]" title="" src="graemlins/xyxwave.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">You have a Turbo S? And of course you've proven this.

Thanks for that you wonderful bench racer, you.
Old 06-10-2003, 03:59 PM
  #9  
Randal
Instructor
 
Randal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

""A stock turbo "S" will significantly outperform a stock 968 - especially above 100 mph.""

NOPE!

I have had both ,driven many...that just isn't true

Randal
Old 06-10-2003, 07:23 PM
  #10  
user 8430
Banned
 
user 8430's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I guess if we defined "significant" we could better discuss it.
Old 06-10-2003, 09:19 PM
  #11  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

danny951

Hey... since nobody is answering.. I'll answer.

A supercharged 968 will beat a stock 944 Turbo S.

It will not only beat it in acceleration, but it will whip it on a track due to the huge TQ differential below 4000rpms (not to mention that it is WAY easier to drive at the limit since there's no sudden rush of power like a turbo)

With the supercharged 968, you don't have to worry about what gear you're in on the track, as there is always big TQ at any point in the rpm range above 2000rpms. A stock 951S (or even a modified turbo car) can't say the same thing. With a turbo, fall below 3500rpms, and you get passed :-)

But the comparision really isn't a fair one.... as we all know full well what a modified 951 is capable of!
Old 06-12-2003, 07:08 PM
  #12  
Fixn2xlr8
Bunny with a Mission
Rennlist Member

 
Fixn2xlr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 21,884
Likes: 0
Received 72 Likes on 45 Posts
Post

I bought the 968 for the car not power,(although I am becoming interested in the low boost turbo conversions I have seen.) Not bashing the 944 because I have owned them and love em to death. I just fell in love with the 968 curves. If you are looking for raw power at a reasonable price I would highly suggest an early 90s Ford Mustang and supercharge it. They dont stick out like a sore thumb at like a 968 when you have to make those undesirable trips to WalMart.
Old 06-12-2003, 09:12 PM
  #13  
wjk_glynn
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
wjk_glynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 2,977
Received 509 Likes on 326 Posts
Post

Here's a list of road test results for comparison:

<a href="http://www.weissach.net/924-944-968_RoadTestSummary.html" target="_blank">http://www.weissach.net/924-944-968_RoadTestSummary.html</a>

Karl.
Old 06-14-2003, 03:34 AM
  #14  
adrial
Nordschleife Master
 
adrial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

To finish off the bench racing:

951S does 60-100 in 8.1-8.6 seconds

968 does 60-100 in 9.1-9.9

951S also stops faster and cuts through the slalom 2mph faster (using the R&T data)

With that said, the 968 with m030 package would probably handle and stop better than a 951S.

On the track, a 951S will probably set about equal laptimes to a 968 with m030...pulling away on the straights a bit, but the 968 catching up in the twisties.

A 951S compared to a 968 w/o m030...the 951S will be quicker around most tracks.

That's the bench race report anyway!

EDIT:

Oops, just realized I left out the skid pad results...which when looking at em now, seem to be inconclusive.
Old 06-14-2003, 09:40 AM
  #15  
Damian in NJ
Race Director
 
Damian in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,195
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

Remember, all that data is a ***** out, pedal to the floor, hitting the red line experiment.

In day to day driving the 968 is a much easier beast to live with, having monster torque at low revs, making it much more enjoyable to drive at anything up to 10/10ths. And just about as fast as a 951 in non track conditions. With a lot less time spent in the shop, which counts for me.


Quick Reply: More fun than a 944T?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:16 AM.