Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

About 50 hp short of perfect...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-2009, 01:28 PM
  #76  
wellcraft290
Three Wheelin'
 
wellcraft290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 1,779
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

no 60 100 if you get the intercooler too
Old 09-03-2009, 01:33 PM
  #77  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,195
Received 555 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

The intercooler comes with different software (and pulley?) for more boost.
Old 09-03-2009, 01:34 PM
  #78  
wellcraft290
Three Wheelin'
 
wellcraft290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 1,779
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

no idea why has more power but per website says more. is confusing on the site
Old 09-03-2009, 02:14 PM
  #79  
964speed
Pro
 
964speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by axl911
I think the 100hp increase is at the flywheel, and the lower number is at the rear wheel. According to TPC, the intercooler is more so to prevent heat soak and maintain power rather than increase hp from the supercharger.
I thought you lose about 10-15% from crank to rear wheels. At least that is what i've been told. TPC numbers suggestion a much larger loss.

Of course you can spend 16k and buy the supercup 3.8 liter upgrade and probably another 5-6k on install and tuning and get the same horse power as a turbo for far more money.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Porsc...d=p3911.c0.m14
Old 09-03-2009, 02:59 PM
  #80  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,446
Received 192 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

OK boys, here's one for you to look at:

Customer in France asks me to collect a 964 race car from London which has been fitted with a stock 993 Varioram engine on Motronic. Loves the car, but the problem is that before he bought it he drove a 911SC race car that we had fitted with a 9m Motec conversion on a 993 Non-Varioram engine. He loved the way that the NVR delivered the power in comparison to the "bland" delivery of the VR, so asked us to convert his engine to the same specification because he wanted a more exciting car to drive.

I drove the car back the 200 miles and have to say that it behaved well enough but was not exactly fast, so I could clearly see the motivation for the work. The engine was fitted with stock 993 heat exchangers, no cats & with a pair of small 993 style side silencers, otherwise completely bone stock. Whilst the engine was out of the car we also fitted a 8:32 R&P along with new Recaros & harnesses. Anyway, here is the customer's response after the drive back to France:

"I'm absolutely delighted by the result of your work. The engine is incomparably more characterful and exciting, not to mention much more powerful (333 vs. 273 BHP!). I love the way it feels strong low down, then torque suddenly builds at 4000 rpm, with another great big wave of torque at 4500, that is sustained until 5500+ and then tails off gently above that.

What a change from the lifeless engine I brought you! And all without opening it at all!!!

I'm a very happy customer. :-D

No flat spots at all, great calibration work all round.

I'm also very pleased with the 8:32 final drive. Perfect."


Here's the before/after dyno graph:
Attached Images  
Old 09-03-2009, 03:05 PM
  #81  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,446
Received 192 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Forgot to add the cost, so before you all ask:

9m Motec conversion £3500 including installation & mapping.
Varioram manifold exchanged for Non-Varioram manifold, nil cost.
Labour to change parts approx £450 including deletion of A/C bracket.

And that's it, apart from VAT.
Old 09-03-2009, 03:14 PM
  #82  
BlueHeeler
Rennlist Member
 
BlueHeeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NineMeister
Forgot to add the cost, so before you all ask:

9m Motec conversion £3500 including installation & mapping.
Varioram manifold exchanged for Non-Varioram manifold, nil cost.
Labour to change parts approx £450 including deletion of A/C bracket.

And that's it, apart from VAT.
Thanks

Last edited by BlueHeeler; 09-03-2009 at 03:16 PM. Reason: I am retarded
Old 09-03-2009, 03:20 PM
  #83  
NineMeister
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NineMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 4,446
Received 192 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Oh, and since you are all asking about TPC supercharger conversions, here is the result of a 993VR engine with a non-intercooled TPC kit installed by us. Had a problem with the package in that the original VR ecu did not like the installation and created a trough in the torque curve, so this is actually the vastly improved torque curve we got from using a stock non-Varioram Motronic ecu in the car.

At least this plot answers everyone's questions about the power from a TPC kit, this one made just a nudge under 360hp corrected at the flywheel as measured on our chassis dyno.
Attached Images  
Old 09-03-2009, 04:15 PM
  #84  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,195
Received 555 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

Wait, so the TPC kit doesn't actually lose power like I read on the internet? And you have the audacity to submit proof? Oh the horror!!

Old 09-03-2009, 05:00 PM
  #85  
964speed
Pro
 
964speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ilko
Wait, so the TPC kit doesn't actually lose power like I read on the internet? And you have the audacity to submit proof? Oh the horror!!

I think ilko sells TPC systems on the side... I still think turbo are the way to go for an upgrade
Old 09-03-2009, 05:08 PM
  #86  
wellcraft290
Three Wheelin'
 
wellcraft290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 1,779
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

ouch. Also am I correct on this doesn't look like abig increase in TQ. what was the increase
Old 09-03-2009, 06:42 PM
  #87  
964speed
Pro
 
964speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wellcraft290
ouch. Also am I correct on this doesn't look like abig increase in TQ. what was the increase
Hey Hey now...It looks like we are ganging up on Ilko because we like turbos...

It's all good - we all like Porsche and to each their own!

Last edited by 964speed; 09-03-2009 at 08:26 PM.
Old 09-03-2009, 08:20 PM
  #88  
boxsey911
Nordschleife Master
 
boxsey911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 5,095
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nine11
I have a chip, LWF, exhaust, and a g-pipe....LWF and g-pipe hasn't been installed yet...but I hope it makes a difference in the car's eagerness to rev. 10k US plus install for 60rwhp???
I think you're on the right path because when I've come off the track in my C2 and taken a passenger ride in a 964RS (euro) it feels like there are an extra 50 horses on board. Yet we all know that they only have 10 extra bhp on paper but that LWF and their skinny weight make a huge difference on how the car goes. And that's before we get to the corners
Old 09-03-2009, 08:43 PM
  #89  
Nine11
Three Wheelin'
 
Nine11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boxsey911
I think you're on the right path because when I've come off the track in my C2 and taken a passenger ride in a 964RS (euro) it feels like there are an extra 50 horses on board. Yet we all know that they only have 10 extra bhp on paper but that LWF and their skinny weight make a huge difference on how the car goes. And that's before we get to the corners
Thanks. I have suspension goodies too that I hope helps in the corners. I might replace that as time goes....but I prefer the 'light is right' approach.
Old 09-07-2009, 08:54 PM
  #90  
raspberryroadster
Three Wheelin'
 
raspberryroadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: on the waterfront, Kobe, Japan
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

bottom line.....the 964 naturally aspirated engines 01,02,03 had a compression ratio of 11:1....vs the 964 turbo's which had a compression ratio of 7.5: or less.

now do any research you want - but forced induction (turbo or supercharger does not matter - at equivalent levels of boost they deliver same power increase) at anything over 9.5:1 UNLESS its serious mild installation with cooling efforts (plus high octane to prevent pre ignition) is treading on thin ice.....even then there is no engine management system available that will combine to prevent engine failure at WOT.

stock naturally aspirated 964 engine deserves to be built out in other than forced induction,
(agree with weight reduction) or supercharged/turbo'd with rebuild of the top end, to get full $'s worth out of very expensive power adder.


Quick Reply: About 50 hp short of perfect...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:34 PM.