Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

CCU upgrade - 993 flash?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2020, 02:20 AM
  #1  
Moriartyhlms
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Moriartyhlms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 36 Posts
Default CCU upgrade - 993 flash?

Has anybody heard of having the 964 Climate Control Unit re-flashed to 993 software? What are the benefits to this, is it worth it?



Old 05-19-2020, 02:49 AM
  #2  
RicardoD
Rennlist Member
 
RicardoD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,854
Received 212 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

The guy to ask is Tore at https://www.bergvillfx.com/

Old 05-19-2020, 02:57 AM
  #3  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,598
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,091 Posts
Default

There is the guy over by us...Loren i think?

iirc all this does is allow fans to be fully off and allows the one touch max ac.

would be curious what else it does.

Old 06-02-2020, 04:29 PM
  #4  
bricem13
Instructor
 
bricem13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Any update on this by OP?

There is the finction too to run the rear blower ignition off to cool down the headers
Old 06-02-2020, 06:24 PM
  #5  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

That particular shop has made that "993-flashed 964 CCU" claim on several occasions and I took that claim straight to Tore who quickly called it a load of BS.
Old 06-02-2020, 06:30 PM
  #6  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bricem13
There is the finction too to run the rear blower ignition off to cool down the headers
My '91 did this back when I used to run the rear blower.
Old 06-03-2020, 03:07 AM
  #7  
ToreB
Rennlist Member
 
ToreB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 2,435
Received 395 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

The text shown in the initial post is pure BS.
There are several software versions of the 964/993 Climate Control Units, all made for use in the vehicle model in question. So the question of benefit of a software upgrade depends on what you have got.
The short version is that the early 964 CCU software version H00/H01 are the only ones that might benefit of an upgrade to the later 964 versions. The main difference are the enhanced OBD functions, (not really noticeable or usable for the driver) and that the two main blowers are possible to regulate to zero speed. (vH00/H01 fans never stop completely, speed setting 0 and 1 are the same) I would question the latter too, it is difficult to notice by the user.
In my opinion, the work and cost involved to change the CCU microprocessor board/memory chip compared to the benefit does not match.

Using a 993 software version or CCU in a 964 needs several modifications to the hardware, since there were many changes of the HVAC system in the 993. Examples are the added rear air selector valve, vacuum operated resirculation flap and the outside temp sensor.
The initial post suggests that a 993 software "makes all the difference", which is BS. There are really no user-noticeable differences between the late 964 units and the 993 units.
Cheers,
Tore
The following 3 users liked this post by ToreB:
kos11-12 (06-03-2020), RicardoD (06-03-2020), Rocket Rob (06-04-2020)
Old 06-03-2020, 12:27 PM
  #8  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ToreB
The initial post suggests that a 993 software "makes all the difference", which is BS. There are really no user-noticeable differences between the late 964 units and the 993 units.
Cheers,
Tore
It's as simple as that!
Old 06-03-2020, 05:14 PM
  #9  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,598
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,091 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ToreB
The text shown in the initial post is pure BS.
There are several software versions of the 964/993 Climate Control Units, all made for use in the vehicle model in question. So the question of benefit of a software upgrade depends on what you have got.
The short version is that the early 964 CCU software version H00/H01 are the only ones that might benefit of an upgrade to the later 964 versions. The main difference are the enhanced OBD functions, (not really noticeable or usable for the driver) and that the two main blowers are possible to regulate to zero speed. (vH00/H01 fans never stop completely, speed setting 0 and 1 are the same) I would question the latter too, it is difficult to notice by the user.
In my opinion, the work and cost involved to change the CCU microprocessor board/memory chip compared to the benefit does not match.

Using a 993 software version or CCU in a 964 needs several modifications to the hardware, since there were many changes of the HVAC system in the 993. Examples are the added rear air selector valve, vacuum operated resirculation flap and the outside temp sensor.
The initial post suggests that a 993 software "makes all the difference", which is BS. There are really no user-noticeable differences between the late 964 units and the 993 units.
Cheers,
Tore
Originally Posted by Lorenfb
It's as simple as that!
So question for you two: I've a 91 with a well functioning CCU, but it would be nice to be able to fully shut off the fans. To add that capability, is that a significant change?

Old 06-03-2020, 05:35 PM
  #10  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyerx
So question for you two: I've a 91 with a well functioning CCU, but it would be nice to be able to fully shut off the fans. To add that capability, is that a significant change?
Why, very little air at those settings anyway? To make that mod requires removing the processor chip from the circuit and re-flashing it.
It may be that the early 964 CCU processor has a mask ROM, i.e. not re-flashable. Once re-flashed, the processor needs to be re-soldered
to the circuit board, which typically results in reliability problems, e.g. the "performance" mod of the '96 993 DME ECU. It's laughable that
someone would even consider having that done given the excellent reliability of the 964/993 CCU and its overall functionality for a very
minor change, i.e. no mention of any significant benefits.
Old 06-03-2020, 07:59 PM
  #11  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,598
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,091 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lorenfb
Why, very little air at those settings anyway? To make that mod requires removing the processor chip from the circuit and re-flashing it.
It may be that the early 964 CCU processor has a mask ROM, i.e. not re-flashable. Once re-flashed, the processor needs to be re-soldered
to the circuit board, which typically results in reliability problems, e.g. the "performance" mod of the '96 993 DME ECU. It's laughable that
someone would even consider having that done given the excellent reliability of the 964/993 CCU and its overall functionality for a very
minor change, i.e. no mention of any significant benefits.
So not worth it :-)

Why? So the fan isn't running constantly. Changing those fans is a big PITA!

Old 06-03-2020, 09:20 PM
  #12  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyerx
So not worth it :-)

Why? So the fan isn't running constantly. Changing those fans is a big PITA!
Running the fans at those very low speeds isn't going to significantly affect the fan lives versus how most run the fans during the summer/winter to affect cabin temps.
Here's the processor board for the CCU;




During development and early production, the processor used an external EPROM. Once the software was finalized, production used a masked ROM in the 80515.
The small 8 pin IC in the upper right is the external flash memory used to store the CCU's fault codes.
Old 06-03-2020, 09:51 PM
  #13  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,598
Received 1,793 Likes on 1,091 Posts
Default

Was the eeprom in the spot to the left?
Old 06-04-2020, 01:02 AM
  #14  
Lorenfb
Race Car
 
Lorenfb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 4,045
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyerx
Was the eeprom in the spot to the left?
Yes, it would have been an EPROM (UV erasable) and probably not a EEPROM (electrically erasable - re-flashable).
Old 06-04-2020, 11:57 AM
  #15  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lorenfb
During development and early production, the processor used an external EPROM. Once the software was finalized, production used a masked ROM in the 80515.
The small 8 pin IC in the upper right is the external flash memory used to store the CCU's fault codes.
What part number is on that CCU? Is that a later 993 unit? I have (not just early production) 964 CCUs with socketed EPROMs. They are just a pain to remove, as you have to desolder some connections in order to split the two main boards.

Originally Posted by SpyerX
Why? So the fan isn't running constantly. Changing those fans is a big PITA!


They tend to last 100K+ miles and/or 15 years or more of solid running. Do you know anyone that's replaced them more than once?



Quick Reply: CCU upgrade - 993 flash?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:43 PM.