Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

16v head and turbo myths

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2023, 06:19 AM
  #136  
bergerac
Intermediate
 
bergerac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 42
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
That was interesting to re-read. So...Duke has gone from 16v Porsche motor to 16v billet Honda motor. Thingo has gone from 3.1lt 16v Porsche motor to insane billet 4lt 16v Thor creation. Thom has gone from 3lt 8v to 3lt 16v. successfully. I went from 3.1 8v to 3.2lt 16v. (The only thing that didn't crack on that was the head). I just received a newly MiD sleeved S2 block and had the head virtually completely rebuilt due to all sorts of problems from previous builder. By the time I get this back in the car it will be right up the very top of the most expensive Porsche i4 motors. Shawn and Sid are mostly out of the game. Guess the only constant is JET951 who continues to have success with their numerous 16v builds with to my knowledge NO failed heads. Obviously there are many more out there running non stock i4 motors. People seem to mostly be communicating via FB pages. Despite some of the disagreements in here from time to time, it's a shame that this forum has fallen away so much. There were some heady days in here and I still enjoy going back in the archives to see who was doing what and when. May it continue...
Definately feel like I'm coming in on the end of an era but still plenty of good information on here and some good gear available.
The following users liked this post:
333pg333 (05-01-2023)
Old 05-13-2023, 06:42 PM
  #137  
nick_968
Burning Brakes
 
nick_968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
That was interesting to re-read. So...Duke has gone from 16v Porsche motor to 16v billet Honda motor. Thingo has gone from 3.1lt 16v Porsche motor to insane billet 4lt 16v Thor creation. Thom has gone from 3lt 8v to 3lt 16v. successfully. I went from 3.1 8v to 3.2lt 16v. (The only thing that didn't crack on that was the head). I just received a newly MiD sleeved S2 block and had the head virtually completely rebuilt due to all sorts of problems from previous builder. By the time I get this back in the car it will be right up the very top of the most expensive Porsche i4 motors. Shawn and Sid are mostly out of the game. Guess the only constant is JET951 who continues to have success with their numerous 16v builds with to my knowledge NO failed heads. Obviously there are many more out there running non stock i4 motors. People seem to mostly be communicating via FB pages. Despite some of the disagreements in here from time to time, it's a shame that this forum has fallen away so much. There were some heady days in here and I still enjoy going back in the archives to see who was doing what and when. May it continue...
I think it is fair to say 16v is the way forward. It has got also got more accessible over the years as more engines are built, intakes are more readily available, and there is the option to weld a flange on the 16v headers to mate to the factory crossover.

I don't think the FB groups have the same longevity as the forums so I hope someday it comes around full circle but that might be wishful thinking. Searching here is so much easier and still so much more information here than on FB.
The following users liked this post:
Jay Wellwood (05-17-2023)
Old 05-13-2023, 09:42 PM
  #138  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,251
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Decent S2/968 heads with cams that are in good condition, seem to have shot up in price in recent years. TurboTim fabricated a new crossover for his 3.0 16v engine, so I guess he decided the original crossover was restrictive.
Old 05-15-2023, 04:22 PM
  #139  
nick_968
Burning Brakes
 
nick_968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blade7
Decent S2/968 heads with cams that are in good condition, seem to have shot up in price in recent years. TurboTim fabricated a new crossover for his 3.0 16v engine, so I guess he decided the original crossover was restrictive.
I think he found the crossover was restrictive at high boost levels, between 25 psi and 30 psi....I think others are using the standard crossover without issues at more normal boost levels, say 15 psi to 20 psi.

There doesn't seem to be any shortage of bare heads so aftermarket cams might be a possibility. Or just find a whole 968/ S2 engine and start with that.

There is no way I would go 3.0 8v again but that is just my personal experience.
Old 05-15-2023, 05:51 PM
  #140  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,251
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Unlikely I'd go 16v now. A 997 turbo makes more sense.
Old 05-15-2023, 08:39 PM
  #141  
bergerac
Intermediate
 
bergerac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 42
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blade7
Unlikely I'd go 16v now. A 997 turbo makes more sense.
Wow you must have some cheap 997s there, a 996 turbo is double what I'm spending on my 3L turbo and a 997 triple here.

Old 05-16-2023, 05:34 AM
  #142  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,251
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bergerac
Wow you must have some cheap 997s there, a 996 turbo is double what I'm spending on my 3L turbo and a 997 triple here.
If I sold my 944 turbo and all the parts I have for it, I'd probably get half what a 997 turbo goes for here. I probably won't be riding litre sports bikes for too much longer, so that would be another chunk of money to put into a toy car.
Old 05-16-2023, 05:43 AM
  #143  
bergerac
Intermediate
 
bergerac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 42
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blade7
If I sold my 944 turbo and all the parts I have for it, I'd probably get half what a 997 turbo goes for here. I probably won't be riding litre sports bikes for too much longer, so that would be another chunk of money to put into a toy car.

​​​​​​Feel free to get in touch if youre selling parts, haha
Old 05-16-2023, 05:47 AM
  #144  
Penguinracer
Rennlist Member
 
Penguinracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

I think the 997 turbo is the sweet spot in the range - the obvious interior, mechanical & exterior improvements over the 996 turbo, but much smaller than the 991 & 992 series cars which were designed from the outset for hybridisation. Some would argue that perhaps the suspension could be made more focussed & interactive but that's a question of how you're going to use the car.
It's a question of how much money do you throw at a 30 year old car?
I now appreciate how much Porsche cheaped out on the 951 / 952 engines - largely because it was a RX7 / Supra competitor. it was never going to get a dry-sump, sleeved block, twin-cam head, closed deck, sequential ignition & injection, big turbo etc - it had to slot in under the 964 C2.
They were built to a price & many who have tracked their 951's have ended up paying that price.
Old 05-16-2023, 09:32 AM
  #145  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,251
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I think a 944 turbo was around £23k in 1985, compare that to a Sierra RS Cosworth that was around £15k at the same time. IMO the 944 was a better engineered car, but the cylinder head and turbo setup was better on the Cosworth. There was probably no money, or reason to update the engine later on. And by 1990 the list price was around £45k anyway. I'm guessing it was cheaper to stick an extra 8 valves in the S2 and 968, than turbocharge them.
Old 05-16-2023, 10:08 AM
  #146  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,907
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bergerac
Wow you must have some cheap 997s there, a 996 turbo is double what I'm spending on my 3L turbo and a 997 triple here.
Depends where you live. Try coming to Australia. Probably still the best country to live in but we pay double+ for anything imported...ie...virtually everything.

Last edited by 333pg333; 05-16-2023 at 10:09 AM.
Old 05-16-2023, 10:14 AM
  #147  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,907
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Penguinracer
I think the 997 turbo is the sweet spot in the range - the obvious interior, mechanical & exterior improvements over the 996 turbo, but much smaller than the 991 & 992 series cars which were designed from the outset for hybridisation. Some would argue that perhaps the suspension could be made more focussed & interactive but that's a question of how you're going to use the car.
It's a question of how much money do you throw at a 30 year old car?
I now appreciate how much Porsche cheaped out on the 951 / 952 engines - largely because it was a RX7 / Supra competitor. it was never going to get a dry-sump, sleeved block, twin-cam head, closed deck, sequential ignition & injection, big turbo etc - it had to slot in under the 964 C2.
They were built to a price & many who have tracked their 951's have ended up paying that price.
I drove a 997 turbo at a Porsche company day some years ago. While it definitely felt fast and very solid, it lacked the tactility of the 951. The speed was more like a locomotive. Just kept getting faster but with little fuss. I felt my 952 of the day (road registered) would have been quicker on the track, but there was no denying the feeling of mile eating technology with the 997t. Ironically useless in this country. With all the space we have the national limit is 110kph...
Old 05-16-2023, 10:31 AM
  #148  
Penguinracer
Rennlist Member
 
Penguinracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Unless you're doing the work yourself, it's arguable that tuning a 951 / 952 for significant & reliable performance by current standards (400+whp) is extortionately expensive & the money might be more constructively deployed towards a 996 / 997 GT3, M2 Comp or C63. We all know that modifying cars is the equivalent of fuelling your camp fire with $100 bills, but when a £600 remap can give your M2 Comp 510 bhp & with the BMW BBK it'll circulate the track all day & then comfortably get you home - you've got to question the whole 951 / 952 thing - I know I am - never again. I'd go more modern & get a modest remap & be driving it rather than constantly building it or fixing it.
I've tried to address the 952's weaknesses i.e. lack of a dry-sump, Alusil bores, open deck design, tiny old-fashioned high back pressure turbo, tiny cam, antiquated ECU - but I don't think it was worth it - I've wasted too much money on this thing - now I've got to own it for life.
Blade - I think going to whatever 911 turbo, GT3 or M-car fits your budget would be a wise move.
Old 05-16-2023, 11:04 AM
  #149  
bergerac
Intermediate
 
bergerac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 42
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Depends where you live. Try coming to Australia. Probably still the best country to live in but we pay double+ for anything imported...ie...virtually everything.
​​​​​​
I know we act like it but WA's not a seperate country yet.

You need to get more creative with your shipping if your paying double, but yes I've spent a lot of money on shipping and GST/tariffs lately.
Old 05-16-2023, 03:35 PM
  #150  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,251
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Penguinracer
Blade - I think going to whatever 911 turbo, GT3 or M-car fits your budget would be a wise move.
Think I'll stick to 200+ bhp bikes for a bit longer




Quick Reply: 16v head and turbo myths



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:17 AM.