Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

3.0 block longevity ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-16-2014, 09:17 AM
  #1  
blade7
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,255
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default 3.0 block longevity ?

Reading about 3.0 engines going pop makes me wonder if despite being an improved design a standard 2.7/3.0 block isn't quite as robust as the original 2.5 turbo block ? Going 3.0 turbo isn't cheap so I'd hope the extra stroke/500cc would yield 15% more power and torque above a similar spec 2.5, but does that come of the expense of reduced engine life ?
Old 12-16-2014, 11:04 AM
  #2  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Mine has clocked 33k miles, now in its 5th year and doesn't drink a drop of oil. Road car.
Old 12-16-2014, 01:28 PM
  #3  
blade7
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,255
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

I seem to recall you posting the 3.0 block heats up quicker and you have uprated the oil cooler, are you using an original turbo water radiator ?
Old 12-17-2014, 03:58 PM
  #4  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

How many people actually keep a 3.0 liter engine within modest boost range? I am sure if the engine was built to make 20% more power than a 951 engine, it would last just as long. Unfortunately, most push the envelope.
Old 12-17-2014, 05:12 PM
  #5  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,547
Received 647 Likes on 501 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 968TurboS
How many people actually keep a 3.0 liter engine within modest boost range? I am sure if the engine was built to make 20% more power than a 951 engine, it would last just as long. Unfortunately, most push the envelope.
if you weren't going for max-effort power that would be an awesome cruiser/bruiser. probably just wring out a K26/8.

3.0L, 300hp, 300ftlbs. square torque curve.
Old 12-17-2014, 05:55 PM
  #6  
blade7
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,255
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 968TurboS
How many people actually keep a 3.0 liter engine within modest boost range? I am sure if the engine was built to make 20% more power than a 951 engine, it would last just as long. Unfortunately, most push the envelope.
I would be one of those people . 16-18lbs would be my boost limit. I doubt I'd get to 50k on a 3.0 but I'd like to drive it hard without it breaking. 400/440 would be enough.
Old 12-17-2014, 06:11 PM
  #7  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
if you weren't going for max-effort power that would be an awesome cruiser/bruiser. probably just wring out a K26/8. 3.0L, 300hp, 300ftlbs. square torque curve.
Actually, how about 305hp and 369lbs/ft of torque. That is what a 968 turbo is on .8bar.
Old 12-17-2014, 06:14 PM
  #8  
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
 
RajDatta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blade7
I would be one of those people . 16-18lbs would be my boost limit. I doubt I'd get to 50k on a 3.0 but I'd like to drive it hard without it breaking. 400/440 would be enough.
But the factory cars typically run .8bar. So to be fair, if you want factory longevity, you can get around 350/350 all day because of the better 2.7 head. Add another .2-.4bar and your numbers are very achievable. Just keep in mind, it's no longer factory boost level, so longevity will be compromise somewhat to maybe 100k? Lol
Old 12-17-2014, 06:29 PM
  #9  
blade7
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,255
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 968TurboS
But the factory cars typically run .8bar. So to be fair, if you want factory longevity, you can get around 350/350 all day because of the better 2.7 head. Add another .2-.4bar and your numbers are very achievable. Just keep in mind, it's no longer factory boost level, so longevity will be compromise somewhat to maybe 100k? Lol
I've had my car 6 years and done around 13k in it, I'd be 100 years old by the time a 3.0 engine was worn out
Old 12-17-2014, 07:19 PM
  #10  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

198 k miles and almost no oil burn and no noticeable loss of power.

the guy who got my engine is going to add boost and prolly enjoy it another 200 k miles.
Old 12-17-2014, 09:18 PM
  #11  
blade7
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,255
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by odurandina
198 k miles and almost no oil burn and no noticeable loss of power.

the guy who got my engine is going to add boost and prolly enjoy it another 200 k miles.
What pistons and bores does that engine have ?
Old 12-17-2014, 09:43 PM
  #12  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

the 968 3.0 has a 4.095" bore and 3.465" stroke.

pistons? "oh man, I only, ride 'em.... I dunno what makes 'em work."

www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5cL-h3Pj1o
Old 12-17-2014, 11:19 PM
  #13  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
if you weren't going for max-effort power that would be an awesome cruiser/bruiser. probably just wring out a K26/8.

3.0L, 300hp, 300ftlbs. square torque curve.

Not sure what planet you're on. But the k26/8 is just way to small for a 3L.


Personally if i wanted a street 3L to last a long time.
16v head with varocam
9:1 or 9.5:1 compression ratio
wossner pistons & carrillo rods..
factory bores.
would go custom plenum
modified 951 headers
GT or GTX 3076R. .82 turbine housing.

probably aim for 320-350 rwhp and you'll get that with low boost.


Just remember you won't always be on full boost and full rpm.
Old 12-17-2014, 11:24 PM
  #14  
fejjj
Rennlist Member
 
fejjj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,360
Received 79 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

I had this conversation with Chris White and he told me that the longevity of these engines is great running up to 15psi.
Old 12-18-2014, 12:25 AM
  #15  
Dougs951S
Race Car
 
Dougs951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 968TurboS
Actually, how about 305hp and 369lbs/ft of torque. That is what a 968 turbo is on .8bar.
What was the factory turbo for the 968T's? That's a lot of torque, more than a k26 would be capable of making. I'm guessing they ran a k27/8?


Quick Reply: 3.0 block longevity ?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:15 PM.