Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

16v manifold construction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2014, 11:25 PM
  #1  
Dougs951S
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Dougs951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default 16v manifold construction

Has anyone ever chopped up a turbo intake and measured its volume? I'm shooting for a 3.8-4 liter plenum for my 16v turbo, and I just thought, what If I just welded S2 runners to a turbo plenum and reused the 951 TB? otherwise, I'm going to use this stuff



an 18" length of that stuff is just about the perfect size and volume and that company also sells the matching end cap and throttle body adapter which gives me a pick of pretty much any throttle body I can dream of. They also make velocity stacks that weld to the back after you cut 3" holes into the flat side. They are ideally matched to the 48mm S2 runners.



The Ross machine racing stuff will no doubt give me a great manifold, but using an already made plenum and TB is just easier. Its also a $$$ thing, just to buy the parts I need from Ross would be ~350+ shipping, plus a hacked up S2 manifold, plus welding. Then I would still need a throttle body, and have to figure out how to adapt whichever one I chose to the 951 throttle cable (The TPS is no big deal since I run stand alone) I'm not trying to spend 600+ dollars on an intake manifold, the complete 16v head didn't even cost me that much. Slapping an S2 and turbo intake together will cost me almost nothing. I justify it by saying down the line, I can always slice off the turbo plenum and build a new one and reuse the runners.

What say the masses?

Last edited by Dougs951S; 07-28-2014 at 11:33 PM.
Old 07-21-2014, 12:48 AM
  #2  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

https://rennlist.com/forums/6046629-post10.html
Old 07-21-2014, 01:03 AM
  #3  
Dougs951S
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Dougs951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Good...so the stock plenum has plenty of volume then to feed a 16v car? I assumed as much. No velocity stacks, but then again...none of the factory intakes have them. Thanks Paulyy.
Old 07-21-2014, 01:31 AM
  #4  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

As far as velocity stacks, I would assume that's more for N/A power.
Because a 2.5 16v isn't as common, there's not much info about them. like how well will the 951 8v intake with with a 16v?

Lindsey racing and SFR have velocity stacks in their intakes.

shorter the runners, the higher the rpm.

IMO go get 2 16v intakes (if you can)
hack one up and mate it to the turbo 8v one and the other one, make a custom plenum.
R&D really.
Old 07-21-2014, 02:12 AM
  #5  
azbanks
Freedom Enthusiast
Rennlist Member
 
azbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I found these pics on the web a couple years ago. I believe the car was owned by someone named Ash.
Attached Images   
Old 07-21-2014, 02:32 AM
  #6  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Why do you guys think that velocity stacks are "more of NA thing"? There are no fundamental differences between NA and forced induction, good flow is beneficial to both types, just boost hides many design flaws and lets OEM's (and also hobbysts) to get away solutions that are not optimal.

And for example: what's the point of getting more airflow from better turbo and then losing because of poor intake?
BTW, OEM manifolds have tapered runner inlets, this is not the same as 90degree sharp connection of the runner and plenum...
Old 07-21-2014, 05:02 AM
  #7  
Dutch944
Three Wheelin'
 
Dutch944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollandaaaa
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'll get some pictures for my 3.0 16v intake asap, cheap solution if you can do the work yourself!
Old 07-21-2014, 05:18 AM
  #8  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I would be interested to drive a car using a 16V/951 hybrid intake. Probably looks like the most straightforward way to quickly come up with a turbo intake fitting fine with a 16V head, but I would think that getting good performance from such an intake/head combination would be very sensitive to cam/turbo combination.
Old 07-21-2014, 08:24 AM
  #9  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Turbo intake plenum size is only about 0.7L IIRC.
Old 07-21-2014, 08:27 AM
  #10  
Thales
Instructor
 
Thales's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another option would be to make a custom plenum design using an existing aftermarket intake - like turbotim3 did.

He started with something like this (for a Supra), cut the runners off, and welded a new plate and 16V runners on...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/221432214358?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
Old 07-21-2014, 10:23 AM
  #11  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,550
Received 650 Likes on 504 Posts
Default

Doug, I've got an AWIC core from a sueprcharged Jag laying around that would make a bitchin plenum
Old 07-21-2014, 10:35 AM
  #12  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

There is no room for AWIC intake manifold.

I made my own intake using stock S2 flange+runners and made dual-plenum with velocity stacks like Audi Quattro S1 and other rally cars have used.

Old 07-21-2014, 10:35 AM
  #13  
Thales
Instructor
 
Thales's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Doug, what displacement and redline are you running?
Old 07-21-2014, 12:55 PM
  #14  
Dougs951S
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Dougs951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

2.5 liter, it will see 6.8-7k.
Old 07-21-2014, 01:21 PM
  #15  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dougs951S
2.5 liter, it will see 6.8-7k.
Personally 7k is pushing it, especially with the factory bearings. and if you're using the stock head internals, it might not be upto the task.


Quick Reply: 16v manifold construction



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:01 PM.