Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

E85 and Injectors??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-04-2014, 06:50 PM
  #16  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

This is on E85 105 Oct. We are changing to 116 Octane but hope that this new brand of fuel works better than the last. Don't have access to Rocket fuel to upgrade any higher from that Reno.
It's not the octane that is the problem, it's the compatibility of the inj to run with E85.
Old 03-04-2014, 06:54 PM
  #17  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave W.
The 1300cc injectors are a good size for the 6 cylinder turbo cars, they're filling a gap in the market. 1300cc should be enough to support around 475whp on E85 in a 4 cylinder application.
I could spend the $1000 on a set of these ID1300's and run lower boost and hope that they work, but in reality that's a bandaid. They should have, and probably will make some 2000's that are Ethanol compatible.

Originally Posted by Paulyy
would it be difficult to go twin injector setup?
Could do it but have just spent a bit of money getting the current setup to fit properly. Twin Injs may be the longer term solution though.
Old 03-05-2014, 01:20 AM
  #18  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I haven't looked recently, but the DSM locals were having quite a few issues with gumming them up.

I havn't had any issues with the style Josh supplied me.

IIRC the guys running the larger injectors were more prone to gumming. I think it may be due to heat and the dribble effect at idle.

I'll see if I can dig up[ any info Patrick.
Old 03-05-2014, 03:56 AM
  #19  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Essentially the factors that I'm reading about repeatedly are as follows:

-MTBE in some blends of E85. Seems more common in Sucrogen based fuels.
-Injs running dry when not in use for sustained periods of time.
-Need to flush with normal pump and then keep them in a bag and lubed.
-Run a 'top of motor' fuel additive. http://tinyurl.com/lj4otm5
-Pintle style better than plate.
-Don't clean them via pulsing, just bath.

Seem to be getting some people who have had no trouble with the ID's where other's have had repeated issues and hate them. Saw these but they're low impedance. I'm advised that we should stick with High.
http://store.034motorsport.com/210lb...impedance.html
Old 03-05-2014, 05:12 AM
  #20  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Found this:

Peak and Hold:

Peak/hold injectors are low impedence, usually in the 1-4 ohm range. When the ecu calls for fuel to be injected, it sends out voltage via the wire clips until a certain current level is reached (the peak part) (varies by injector size, company). For the duration of 1 pulse width, that current is slightly reduced and held (the hold part).

Advantages of this design:
minimizes the injectors "on" time, resulting in faster response
Disadvantages of this design:
increases coil heat, which can lead to failure over time

Saturated:

Saturated injectors are generally higher impedence than peak and hold, running in about the 10-15 ohms range. Unlike peak/hold, a saturated injector remains "on" for the entire pulse width.

Advantages of this design:
reduces heat
Disadvantages of this design:
slower response time
can't handel large CC or lb/hr styles due to limitations in its speed.

Last edited by Paulyy; 03-05-2014 at 06:50 AM.
Old 03-05-2014, 04:18 PM
  #21  
Dutch944
Three Wheelin'
 
Dutch944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollandaaaa
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Good info Pauly! I thought the Siemens Deka injectors were low impedance.. So the better one in my eyes..
Old 03-05-2014, 04:43 PM
  #22  
pole position
Burning Brakes
 
pole position's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Siemens Deka's suck , very poor idle poor spray pattern and they are a copy of the Lucas injectors which also sucked.

You need Bosch Motorsport EV 14 injectors not drilled Vendor Ev 14's that started out as 55 pounders.....

If I have time I will look up some part numbers for you.... Disclaimer , they are $$$
Old 03-05-2014, 05:04 PM
  #23  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Friend of mine runs ID2000 with E85 and he hasn't had any problem, though that is with a twin turbo'd small block Chevy.
Old 03-05-2014, 06:00 PM
  #24  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Just seems to be 180o polarising opinions on these. Apparently the injs worked ok at the dyno last night. Will have them checked again today.
Old 03-05-2014, 07:50 PM
  #25  
glen2002
Racer
 
glen2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just seems to be 180o polarising opinions on these. Apparently the injs worked ok at the dyno last night. Will have them checked again today.
Maybe get an old Commodore and try Peter Brock's "Energy Polariser" - meant to solve all fuel problems, add hp and be good for your karma!


PS Good luck on solving the problem - or it not appearing- before the weekend.
Old 03-05-2014, 09:22 PM
  #26  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Lol at the Polariser.

We’re testing the injs today but apparently they worked ok last night at dyno. Looks like there’s going to be plenty of rain at Wakefield anyway. Damn…been a drought for months and months down there and the first meeting it’s raining!
Oh well, could be worse. Could be a Farmer.
Old 03-05-2014, 09:26 PM
  #27  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Dyno?
Old 03-05-2014, 11:29 PM
  #28  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Yes, we finally went back with the new GTX3582 last night. Well I wasn't there but according to the operator he was very pleased with the change of turbos. Unfortunately comparing charts to the previous BW hybrid doesn't look to have yeilded any improvements but I'm lead to believe that they did it on different ramp rates for some reason. So again, it's just over 500hp to the wheels with it nosing off at 6k.
They did say they were able to get a bit more ign into it this time but I haven't got those maps yet.

As you can imagine, I'm very interested in what you find with your intake this week Shawn! :-)
Old 03-05-2014, 11:29 PM
  #29  
David Floyd
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
David Floyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,109
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Running these with E85.. no problems so far

http://fuelinjectorclinic.com/996tt-997tt/IS901-1100H
Old 03-06-2014, 12:31 AM
  #30  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 98 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Thanks David. Unfortunatly they're about 45% too small for my application but glad to hear you've had good experience at least on your car. :-)


Quick Reply: E85 and Injectors??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:30 PM.