Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

The Next Big Engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2014 | 12:22 PM
  #76  
URG8RB8's Avatar
URG8RB8
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
From: Bangkok, Thailand, Milpitas, CA & Weeki Wachee, FL
Default



I hate acronyms. I have heard that as well along with minimum base timing. Just wanted to make sure. At least I assumed correctly what you were referring too after looking at my timing maps.
Old 06-25-2014 | 12:58 PM
  #77  
Pauerman's Avatar
Pauerman
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 863
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Valley of the Sun
Default

Base timing is different - this is the amount of "timing offset" that the ecu uses when it starts counting (ring gear) teeth. So, the pins on the flywheel dictate this offset and trigger a starting point for calculating engine position. If memory serves, the factory offset is around -47 degrees BTDC (before top dead center). This also marks the maximum amount of timing advance you can apply to your timing map.
Old 06-25-2014 | 01:33 PM
  #78  
URG8RB8's Avatar
URG8RB8
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
From: Bangkok, Thailand, Milpitas, CA & Weeki Wachee, FL
Default

I kind of like this one:

Minimum (advance) for Best Torque

Is it true that that you will achieve the best or peak torque if you adjust your timing advance so you create peak cylinder pressures at approximately 15 degrees ATDC(After Top Dead Center)?
Old 06-25-2014 | 01:39 PM
  #79  
URG8RB8's Avatar
URG8RB8
Drifting
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
From: Bangkok, Thailand, Milpitas, CA & Weeki Wachee, FL
Default

If anybody else is interested, found this thread and the information is quite good:


http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=251159

It is a bit lengthy and in depth though.
Old 06-25-2014 | 06:21 PM
  #80  
Dave W.'s Avatar
Dave W.
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 850
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
From: SF Bay Area
Default

MBT is one of those TLA's that seems to have a few different definitions. Like you said, I prefer Minimum (advance) for Best Torque aka the lowest timing that produces the best power. If a tuner adds more timing on top of MBT the stress level goes way up while power starts to drop. Since I'm running E85 I might not get any knock until timing is advanced way beyond MBT, so I have to tune on a dyno and do timing sweeps to find MBT. I started doing a timing sweep at 14psi on the dyno last Sunday, I added 1.4 degrees per run on 3 back to back runs and it gained around 10HP each time. Then I ran out of time.

Yes I realize my timing is very safe right now. I wasn't exactly sure if the new engine would like more or less timing. I'll keep it there until the next oil change. Right now I have cheap 10W-40 in the engine for break-in. Once I have enough miles and some good 20W-50 I'll start ramping up the timing to find the limit.
Old 06-25-2014 | 06:38 PM
  #81  
Dougs951S's Avatar
Dougs951S
Race Car
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Default

Dave, are you logging knock off the stock sensor, or do you have a real time display? I tuned my car myself and and ready now to do a final timing sweep as mine is extremely conservative, but I want a real time view of knock while I do it. I dont know if it was stated earlier in this thread, but what sort of timing do you run at peak torque? I'm at 22* but I don't know how far I can push it, or what a reasonable value after MBT is.

Last edited by Dougs951S; 06-25-2014 at 09:13 PM.
Old 06-25-2014 | 08:22 PM
  #82  
SirLapsalot's Avatar
SirLapsalot
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 745
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Interesting, had read MBT as max brake torque in textbooks and thought it to be generally 30 degrees BTDC. What are you guys seeing your max brake torque timing to be? And you are saying you actually retard your timing from this MBT timing?? So for example if MBT timing is 35 degrees BTDC you are setting your timing to 5 degrees BTDC (30 degrees after MBT timing like you say?)
Old 06-26-2014 | 01:53 AM
  #83  
Dave W.'s Avatar
Dave W.
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 850
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by Dougs951S
Dave, are you logging knock off the stock sensor, or do you have a real time display? I tuned my car myself and and ready now to do a final timing sweep as mine is extremely conservative, but I want a real time view of knock while I do it. I dont know if it was stated earlier in this thread, but what sort of timing do you run at peak torque? I'm at 22* but I don't know how far I can push it, or what a reasonable value after MBT is.
I have a Curtis knock counter, but it's never picked up a single blip since I converted to E85. I typically run conservative timing anyway. Right now I'm at 12* at torque peak @3k rpm and 14 psi. Looking at the previous posts is killing me, I figure I can add another 5 degrees easily and pick up some decent power with no other changes. I'm hoping things go well this weekend so I can change the oil and schedule another dyno session.
Old 06-26-2014 | 02:26 AM
  #84  
blown 944's Avatar
blown 944
Race Car
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Firestone, Colorado
Default

Yeah, You will pick up a lot of power!! Like I said, I picked up 10 mph in the quarter going from conservative timing to what I have now. I bet I'd pick up at least 2 MPH bumping my current setup with the bigger bore.

You're right, you won't register any real counts I'm betting. I would just ramp up the top end quite a bit and then come back to the mid range and try to figure out where the tq drops off. I imagine you'll be around 37 degrees on the top end and 22 at 4k. Not sure where you'll be in the spool area.

I'm sure you know this, but generally you can be very rich w/o losing much power on E85. For example on a few runs tonight I was running in the 11.0:1 AFR range and still laid down some good mph.

The reason I say this, is that it would be less time spent on the dyno by adding a bit (alot) of fuel initially and bringing the timing in and then fine tuning it after you figure out where you come in on the timing.

For example I'd drive it and get the AFRs around 10.9-11.0 and then go play with the timing on the dyno.

My 02
Old 06-26-2014 | 02:57 AM
  #85  
Dave W.'s Avatar
Dave W.
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 850
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Good advice, thanks. I was trying to keep the AFR's around 12.0 more or less. You're right, I have more to gain by finding the best timing curve and ramping up the boost. We'll see what happens this weekend.
Old 06-26-2014 | 03:03 AM
  #86  
Dougs951S's Avatar
Dougs951S
Race Car
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Default

This question is aimed more at sid, im really surprised that ramping up the timing that much after peak tq is ok. Right now with a k27 that peaks at about 4k, im at 22* at peak tq @ 22 psi and 23.5 at 6.5k. Do I stand to gain a lot by adding in a lot past 4k? To me, the car still pulls hard to 6500 but maybe im missing something? Im on e85. I try to keep my afr around 12:1 on boost as that is where the car seems to pull the hardest.
Old 06-26-2014 | 03:11 AM
  #87  
blown 944's Avatar
blown 944
Race Car
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Firestone, Colorado
Default

You are probably missing some power with that low of timing. However, one thing to note is that the k27 will fall off if you are over around 18-19 psi in the upper rpms anyway. So you may not gain due to the hot air. That is where you'll need to pay attn to AIT's.

When talking about using aggressive timing, I'm talking about with a turbo that is still efficient throughout the rpm and boost range. Getting too agressive with hot air is asking for trouble..
Old 06-26-2014 | 03:27 AM
  #88  
Dougs951S's Avatar
Dougs951S
Race Car
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
You are probably missing some power with that low of timing. However, one thing to note is that the k27 will fall off if you are over around 18-19 psi in the upper rpms anyway. So you may not gain due to the hot air. That is where you'll need to pay attn to AIT's.

When talking about using aggressive timing, I'm talking about with a turbo that is still efficient throughout the rpm and boost range. Getting too agressive with hot air is asking for trouble..
It surprises me too, but even pushing thd little turbo as hars as I am, my IAT on boost never get over 110. I have a comically huge FMIC, what kind of temps do you see with the hx40? I cant remember if you're running a front mount or a modified stock unit. It hardly matters re: the k27, im about to buy a bunch of pipe and convert to an hx35/.64 vband in/out setup. It should have no problem holding 23-24 psi to redline because yes, im only seeing 17ish psi by 6.5k with the k27.
Old 06-26-2014 | 04:21 AM
  #89  
blown 944's Avatar
blown 944
Race Car
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Firestone, Colorado
Default

I have the biggest FMIC you can install without MAJOR redesign. it's 4" core 31x18 IIRC. My AIT's are never much above ambient.
Old 06-26-2014 | 11:50 AM
  #90  
V2Rocket's Avatar
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 45,595
Received 665 Likes on 518 Posts
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
I have the biggest FMIC you can install without MAJOR redesign. it's 4" core 31x18 IIRC. My AIT's are never much above ambient.
im guessing you have to be careful over speedbumps with an 18" IC...what a beast


Quick Reply: The Next Big Engine



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:13 AM.