Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

preffered years for original pistons and rods?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2014 | 03:13 PM
  #1  
bebbetufs's Avatar
bebbetufs
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,118
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Norway
Default preffered years for original pistons and rods?

I need to make some decisions on which parts to use in my engine build.

I have two sets of pistons.
The right one is a smooth type which has smooth crowns (x5e) with very slight machining marks, while one has deeper machining grooves (t5b), this set is 1 gramme lighter.


What are the differences between them? Should one be preffered?

Also. Is there a way to check if enough of the coating is intact? I'm not sure I like the gray colour of one of the sets. It has been ultrasonically cleaned but I fear the solution has damaged them.


Finally I have two sets of rods. One sintered set which comes from a low mileage undamaged engine and one foreged set which comes from a en engine which has been through a snapped timing belt. I expect both sets to be fine, but the sintered set has already been balanced. Is the benefit of the forged seg great enough to warrant sending a second set off for balancing? I'm guesstimating my engine to end up in the 300-320 RWHP range.
Old 01-26-2014 | 04:34 AM
  #2  
Dougs951S's Avatar
Dougs951S
Race Car
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Default

I can't speak on the pistons since I don't know, but if I were you I'd definitely spend the money to get the forged rods balanced and use those. 300 rwhp isn't a ton of power, but I'd want the strongest bottom end I could build if you're already going through the hassle of building a motor. It'd really suck to button it all up and run it for some time, and then chuck one of those sintered rods through the block.
Old 01-26-2014 | 10:00 AM
  #3  
Van's Avatar
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 12,008
Received 95 Likes on 65 Posts
From: Hyde Park, NY
Default

FYI... Porsche thought the forged rods were better for the turbo... YMMV.

For the pistons, I'd be more concerned about matching the tolerance group to the block you're going to use. Also, I'd check for scratches on the sides of the pistons.
Old 01-26-2014 | 02:41 PM
  #4  
bebbetufs's Avatar
bebbetufs
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,118
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Norway
Default

Thanks guys. All the pistons are group 1.

The cast rods are the originals from my 62k miles 1990 turbo so they must be strong enough for Porsche. Are the cast rods known to cause trouble? I'm asking out of curiosity as I'm leaning towards the forged rods myself.
Old 01-26-2014 | 08:46 PM
  #5  
blade7's Avatar
blade7
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,260
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
From: England UK
Default

Originally Posted by bebbetufs
Thanks guys. All the pistons are group 1.

The cast rods are the originals from my 62k miles 1990 turbo so they must be strong enough for Porsche. Are the cast rods known to cause trouble? I'm asking out of curiosity as I'm leaning towards the forged rods myself.
Cast rods plenty strong enough for 250 bhp...
Old 01-26-2014 | 09:06 PM
  #6  
Reimu's Avatar
Reimu
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: NC Triad
Default

Has anyone even bent a stock rod without some sort of engine trauma going on?
Old 01-27-2014 | 07:18 PM
  #7  
eman930's Avatar
eman930
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,919
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
From: CT
Default

I havent heard of any rod problems fordged or not
Old 01-28-2014 | 07:57 AM
  #8  
bebbetufs's Avatar
bebbetufs
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,118
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Norway
Default

Me neither...Still, I might as well go with the cast rods if they check out fine.



Quick Reply: preffered years for original pistons and rods?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:57 AM.