Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Compression Ratio??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2013, 02:20 AM
  #1  
Fluidplay
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Fluidplay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Update...Compression Ratio?? Solved :))

Ignorant question, but need some education...How much of a change in compression ratio do you need to see a change in the way the engine will ultimately perform?

What's the positive or negative effect...I've heard lower CR less chance of knock on pump gas, but you lose low end torque. Higher CR more torque, but tuning is extremely critical.

Is the range below a resonable range of running our engines?

7.6 CR
8.5 CR


Have located a new set of pistons with 8:1 CR...the build continues.

Last edited by Fluidplay; 04-10-2013 at 03:18 PM.
Old 04-08-2013, 06:55 AM
  #2  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Bit of a "how long is a piece of string" question... You can run whatever CR you want if you can adjust your ignition profile in function of knock threshold, turbo spool, etc.
Old 04-08-2013, 08:55 AM
  #3  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,916
Received 96 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Are those two some pistons you have a choice of Dennis?
Old 04-08-2013, 11:18 AM
  #4  
Fluidplay
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Fluidplay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Those are possibilities...that being said , I'm leaning toward the 7.6:1.

So here are a few questions:
1) am I giving away too much low end power
2) how does it change turbo response
3) can the tune be adjusted to compensate

Thanks in advance for your input..
Old 04-08-2013, 11:27 AM
  #5  
Dutch944
Three Wheelin'
 
Dutch944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollandaaaa
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I would choose the 8.5 (also because i've ordered my pistons with that CR)

A 7.5 is way to low in my opinion but there are way more experienced engine builders here who can provide you with the proper info!
Old 04-08-2013, 11:43 AM
  #6  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

It really depends on what you are doing. What kind of motor are you building? What kind power? We have discussed this quite a bit lately, I would do a search.
Old 04-08-2013, 11:59 AM
  #7  
Fluidplay
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Fluidplay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My goal is a reliable 325rwhp.

List of engine upgrades..
Blocked - bored to 101
Crank - knife edged, cross drilled
Stock rods
Wossner pistons
Head - 930 valves, ported and polished, stiffer springs
Mild cam
Super 61 turbo
48# injectors
Link ECU

Concerns with this CR: not getting the power goals and additional turbo lag
Old 04-08-2013, 12:01 PM
  #8  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,537
Received 645 Likes on 499 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by refresh951
It really depends on what you are doing. What kind of motor are you building? What kind power? We have discussed this quite a bit lately, I would do a search.
and what fuel do you intend to run?
Old 04-08-2013, 12:27 PM
  #9  
Fluidplay
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Fluidplay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

with the lower CR I could run more boost on pump gas with less chance of knocking, but the question is again...am I sacrificing hp and turbo response..?
Old 04-08-2013, 12:36 PM
  #10  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Depends on the size of the turbo, but the smallest turbo that may compensate for the loss of low end may run badly out of breathe at higher rpm, and I see the Super 61 as being too big for that.
Old 04-08-2013, 12:47 PM
  #11  
Fluidplay
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Fluidplay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Thom
Depends on the size of the turbo, but the smallest turbo that may compensate for the loss of low end may run badly out of breathe at higher rpm, and I see the Super 61 as being too big for that.
Unsure what you mean... are you saying that the Super 61 would be big enough to pull through the higher rpm's?
Old 04-08-2013, 01:47 PM
  #12  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I would definitely run the 8.5 CR and probably a Super 48 or Super 53 if you go LR, IMO the Super 61 will be to big for your stated goals. 7.5 CR is something I have considered but only for big power +475 hp.
Old 04-08-2013, 02:23 PM
  #13  
67King
Race Car
 
67King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll try to reply later, but this is not a simple discussion. Quick answer is a 61 is about 50% bigger than you need, so I'd go with an appropriately sized turbo to reduce lag. Too high a CR will mean detonation, but that is usually a low RPM, high load condition. Fuel, altitude, temperature, etc. all come into play. Will try to post up more later
Old 04-08-2013, 02:27 PM
  #14  
Fluidplay
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Fluidplay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by refresh951
I would definitely run the 8.5 CR and probably a Super 48 or Super 53 if you go LR, IMO the Super 61 will be to big for your stated goals. 7.5 CR is something I have considered but only for big power +475 hp.
..would love to be able to change things around, but unfortuntily this is what I have to work with...

It sounds like what you're saying is that the upgrades I do have will support much more hp than my goal. Not a bad thing but again at what cost to low end torque/power? If this engine was purely for a track car, would this would be a good set-up...?
Old 04-08-2013, 06:10 PM
  #15  
Dougs951S
Race Car
 
Dougs951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Austin TX, drinking beer in the garage
Posts: 3,602
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Looking at it like " my mods will support X more power than my goal, woohoo" is not really the right way to look at it. Everyone here has given their own opinions and offered you good advice and while I am not nearly as knowledgeable as some of the folks here, I will try to answer your question directly. With that low a CR and that large of a turbo, your car is simply going to be a dog if its tuned for 325 hp. What you have COULD support much more, but with 48# injectors you will never see the potential a 7.5 CR motor with a 61 turbo can reach. As stated before, with the right injectors and fuel pump that motor could see 450+ rwhp. At the very least, please tell me that super 61 is a #8 housing with a stage 3 wheel as this is the quickest spooling setup for that compressor. Get the higher comp pistons and be happy (er), or raise the bar and go full retard IE get the 7.5 comp pistons, some bigger injectors, and an upgraded clutch and shoot for 400+ rwhp and live with the lag.


Quick Reply: Compression Ratio??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:28 AM.