Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

2005 Ford GT40 vs. 1988 951S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2012, 02:26 AM
  #46  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,435
Received 87 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

if owning a six figures super car would guarantee high IQ but that's something money can't buy
Old 08-26-2012, 02:30 AM
  #47  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,435
Received 87 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

https://rennlist.com/forums/9793065-post586.html

a punny 2.8L 11.7 @ 124mph btw we aren't taking about stock 951's, lol
Old 08-26-2012, 02:57 AM
  #48  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,704
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KaiKai951S

Wasn't the '88-89 951S considered a supercar back in its hey-day? As I recall It was on par or better than the 930, the Ferrari 328, and the Vette of the day.

3rd best car of the '80s, easily imo.
Old 08-26-2012, 06:13 AM
  #49  
DanaT
Three Wheelin'
 
DanaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mudbuddha
Wait Dana, don't you have one of those? It is entirely feasible with an ideal set up, crazy driver, and in the right simulation. I personally wouldn't do it cause I am not that crazy.
Yes I have one (busa).

Unless you live at high altitude and have the benefit of a turbo against the N/A, even an ideal setup doesn't matter.

A stock busa (sea level) will run 145mph quarter miles.

Mine (at the same track sid runs at) an EASY pass (no hard launch, rolling on the throttle...basically a street start) was a very low 11 at 131mph.

I am doubting many a 951 are making power like Sid is and that is about as close to an "ideal" advantage as you can give to a 951. A drag-strip at 6000ft.
Old 08-26-2012, 06:21 AM
  #50  
DanaT
Three Wheelin'
 
DanaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djantlive
Nice story

I happen to have a Gallardo and a 944S2

I get people checking out the Gallardo all the time. I often avoid looking back as I don't want to provoke a race. So, if you even get someone minding their own business, that would be the "look"

The 944 S2 is so slow compared to Gallardo it's like comparing a bicycle to a motorcycle. Even my FD was much faster. Your 951 may be faster than a NA 944 3L engine. I have only driven 944 2.7 turbos and I am not impressed.

In short, there is nothing the 944 has over a modern supercar, except the price and the ability to not have to worry about the car in shady areas. That's why I have the 944.

Naturally, the story is only theoretical, of course.
You know, I have to somewhat agree with you. My 951 is sitting 5000 miles from me. I could have easily had it shipped here to Germany where I could have driven it fast.

However, I feel the car is faster than it is safe. It lacks many of the modern cars improvements (ABS, traction control, stability control, crush zones, etc, etc). I would feel much safer driving my Cayenne fast on an Autobahn than the 951. Never mind the 951 always needs "tweeking".
Old 08-26-2012, 06:58 AM
  #51  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lart951
what's the 1/4 mile time of a lambo? 12.1 @ 120mph?
up here they run 14's at just over 100. I have a video of one at the track. I was not impressed to say the least. The ET I could see with a bad driver but the MPH should still have been higher. I'll post the video for everyone to see.
Old 08-26-2012, 07:24 AM
  #52  
DanaT
Three Wheelin'
 
DanaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
up here they run 14's at just over 100. I have a video of one at the track. I was not impressed to say the least. The ET I could see with a bad driver but the MPH should still have been higher. I'll post the video for everyone to see.
Cool.

Post that..then my car will be faster than a Gallardo.
Old 08-26-2012, 11:36 AM
  #53  
mudbuddha
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mudbuddha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clarksburg, Maryland
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Post that..then my car will be faster than a Gallardo.
...and mine will at least as a fast as one of those. I will try to get some 80-120 measurements and see what it does. Been wanting to take it to the strip as well but do worry about breaking an axle or something as I haven't gone back for over 10 years.

130+ trap speed is insanely fast. Ok, so maybe not those 900-1000cc bikes but perhaps more in the 6/700 cc categories. However, I prefer to go with 4 wheels vehicles as it's a fairer comparison.
Old 08-26-2012, 02:16 PM
  #54  
KaiKai951S
Instructor
 
KaiKai951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by odurandina
3rd best car of the '80s, easily imo.
What would you consider the first and second? I would say the F40 and the 959 would have to be the top two of the 80's
Old 08-26-2012, 02:53 PM
  #55  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,435
Received 87 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanaT
(ABS, traction control, stability control, crush zones, etc, etc).
So ironic, so you feel safer riding a bike @ 100mph+ than a 951, I assume since bikes do have all those electronics as well, right?
Old 08-26-2012, 05:02 PM
  #56  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

A stock S2!? How did that get in here? I like S2's but talk about bringing a knife to a gun fight!
Old 08-26-2012, 05:50 PM
  #57  
Scott H
Three Wheelin'
 
Scott H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mudbuddha
I do remember them being real loud...kind of a mechanical/metallic kind of noise.
Allow me, ahem... BRAPBRAPBRAPBRAPBRAPBRAPBRAPBRAPBRAP

One of the best noises in the world.
Old 08-26-2012, 06:27 PM
  #58  
mudbuddha
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mudbuddha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clarksburg, Maryland
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Allow me, ahem... BRAPBRAPBRAPBRAPBRAPBRAPBRAPBRAPBRAP

One of the best noises in the world
That's it, thanks Scott. Bring back some memories. They make good drift cars and dragsters.
Old 08-26-2012, 07:04 PM
  #59  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,435
Received 87 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by schip43
A stock S2!? How did that get in here? I like S2's but talk about bringing a knife to a gun fight!
Yea, a Stock s2 vs a Gallardo, there is an 10 year old kid on youtube that his dad has a gallardo and his older brother has a s2 I wonder if there is any relation

Old 08-26-2012, 07:47 PM
  #60  
mudbuddha
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mudbuddha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clarksburg, Maryland
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

3rd best car of the '80s, easily imo.
What would you consider the first and second? I would say the F40 and the 959 would have to be the top two of the 80's
Also the 951S was only behind the 928S4 in the late eighties to have the 4th highest top speed in a production car I believe..167mph iirc. It was slightly quicker to 0-60 than a 911 turbo too stock. So we have the same gearing to have achieved these numbers but a lot of 951s out there, at least the majority on this board have modified ones for even better hp/tq so the performance number/s should be better to start out wouldn't it? The higher end, higher dollars cars of today are just modified, albeit by the factory, versions of the originals decades earlier.


Quick Reply: 2005 Ford GT40 vs. 1988 951S



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:39 AM.