Turbo Advice- BorgWarner & Garrett
#77
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Official Jack off extinguisher
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Geoff, when you say greater performance potential can you give an idea of what to expect vs the Garrett single scroll option?
Will I have a significant increase in peak power, where peak boost will be achieved, transient response, etc? If you can give some expectations vs the known dbb T3/T04E results: http://refresh951.com/Dyno.htm
Will I have a significant increase in peak power, where peak boost will be achieved, transient response, etc? If you can give some expectations vs the known dbb T3/T04E results: http://refresh951.com/Dyno.htm
The above turbo BB or not will get you to approx 350whp depending on dyno and spools well.....a T04E/50 trim coupled with a KKK hot housing will bolt right up and has been done countless times. The problem are the the KKK hothousings, no matter #6,8 or 10 they are very similar in size and of a ancient design. They do induce fast spool due to the large backpressure / high EGT's and are really only efficient up to around 18 psi, if you want to go up it will be a point of diminshing returns. All what you are going to get is a TQ increase, you will plateau HP and especially coupled with large cold sides they are laggier than s**t.
To answer your other question, yes you will see significant improvements with a modern turbo, billet wheels , efficient hot housings, twinscroll etc etc but you need boost to get them to shine.
Now to the expense..........a TO4E BB approx 1200-1400 depending where you go, should fabricate a 3'downpipe so another 100 or so with v bands......I do not know if the new BW will fit so you might need to fab a mount or modify it....200 for oildrain/feed lines.....321 v bands flanges merge collector (can make one DIY) another 350-400.......twin Tials 500........if you do the fab work you have already roughly 1100 in material right there and I am counting on that you are getting Bro deals not paying full retail plus the turbo vs 1500 max with the bolt on. That is the reson those threads with big turbo dreams hardly ever materialize.
#78
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now to the expense..........a TO4E BB approx 1200-1400 depending where you go, should fabricate a 3'downpipe so another 100 or so with v bands......I do not know if the new BW will fit so you might need to fab a mount or modify it....200 for oildrain/feed lines.....321 v bands flanges merge collector (can make one DIY) another 350-400.......twin Tials 500........if you do the fab work you have already roughly 1100 in material right there and I am counting on that you are getting Bro deals not paying full retail plus the turbo vs 1500 max with the bolt on. That is the reson those threads with big turbo dreams hardly ever materialize
#80
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pole position, I really appreciate "the voice of reason". Is LR the only distributor currently to mate a KKK hotside?
If I recall correctly, the Garrett will work if you weld a T4 4-bolt flange up to the crossover?
If I recall correctly, the Garrett will work if you weld a T4 4-bolt flange up to the crossover?
#81
Race Car
Oh I'm fully aware that it is two separate nozzles hitting the wheel, with half of the exhaust volume.
Go ahead and sell these guys a 1.06 t4 twin scroll setup and get back to me. I'm pretty sure you won't have many happy customers.
My comparison was between the nozzle area of a t4 ts .48 and an open .82 t3.
Considering the exhaust energy is dramatically reduced with the extra distance I personally don't feel it is worth the effort over and above a well sorted properly sized t3 or t4.
Again, build one, install a large t4 twin scroll and prove me wrong.
These engines don't have the rpm capability to utilize much over .6 ts t4 IMO.
Until I see it done -on a 944t- it's a pipe dream.
Thanks for your time and insult, have a good day.
Go ahead and sell these guys a 1.06 t4 twin scroll setup and get back to me. I'm pretty sure you won't have many happy customers.
My comparison was between the nozzle area of a t4 ts .48 and an open .82 t3.
Considering the exhaust energy is dramatically reduced with the extra distance I personally don't feel it is worth the effort over and above a well sorted properly sized t3 or t4.
Again, build one, install a large t4 twin scroll and prove me wrong.
These engines don't have the rpm capability to utilize much over .6 ts t4 IMO.
Until I see it done -on a 944t- it's a pipe dream.
Thanks for your time and insult, have a good day.
It seems you do not realize that twinscroll is literally (2) seperate scrolls. Try and think of each scroll like a nozzle on a water hose, spinning a pinwheel. In the case of singlescroll you have 1 hose spinning the pinwheel, in the case of the twinscroll you have 2 hoses (nozzles) spinning it. The A/R must not be thought of the same as (1) scroll a/r sizing. IE: a twinscroll 1.0 a/r is actually (2) x 0.5 A/R nozzles, spraying exhaust gas at the turbine wheel
again - this would be common knowledge for those who are familiar with twinscroll, but your particular platform has been dominated by singlescroll configs for a long time. Nothing wrong at all with a proper singlescroll setup, but the torque/midrange/powerband can not hold a candle to a properly constructed twinscroll performance
you can not have the same A/R for an accurate singlescroll vs twinscroll test, the singlescroll would be wayyyy too lazy and laggy at 1.06 a/r OR conversely the twinscroll would be way too restrictive at .63 a/r
the question you need to decide is whether you want something bolt-on: T3/T04E
OR
a fabrication intensive project with greater performance potential: twinscroll
again - this would be common knowledge for those who are familiar with twinscroll, but your particular platform has been dominated by singlescroll configs for a long time. Nothing wrong at all with a proper singlescroll setup, but the torque/midrange/powerband can not hold a candle to a properly constructed twinscroll performance
you can not have the same A/R for an accurate singlescroll vs twinscroll test, the singlescroll would be wayyyy too lazy and laggy at 1.06 a/r OR conversely the twinscroll would be way too restrictive at .63 a/r
the question you need to decide is whether you want something bolt-on: T3/T04E
OR
a fabrication intensive project with greater performance potential: twinscroll
#82
Rennlist Member
I don't know where you are getting your t4 housings from, but there is not a lot of difference between 1.06 T3 and T4 housings that are available these days, and certainly not a gigantic gap in performace.
Based on my experience I think T4 is the way to go in the future.
Based on my experience I think T4 is the way to go in the future.
#83
Rennlist Member
The TO4E is pretty much a direct bolt on with a few minor modification (bracket mods/TB spring mount/alternator shroud/Oil drain spacer). The turbo also requires minor oil and water plumbing.
Some have said that DBB is not necessary and it may not be. I liked the results Nize had posted a few years back. I did a lot of research and could not find any true side by side comparisons and my goal was 325 rwhp with as close to K26/6 spool as possible. For a few hundred extra dollars it was worth it to me to get as quick a spool as I could as my car is primarily a street car.
I am running the stock down pipe with a bursch test pipe. I am sure I would benefit some from a more free flowing exhaust but still I am very happy with the results.
#86
Race Car
Maybe there are different sizes? From what I have there is a huge difference between t3 and t4.
#87
#90
Rennlist Member
I think the naming convention may have changed over time. The twin scroll housings I have seen for gt30 size turbos are not a lot different in size, and a/r is a/r.