Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

The 951 question...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2009, 08:40 PM
  #76  
EVOMMM
Rennlist Member
 
EVOMMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY NY
Posts: 4,124
Received 1,654 Likes on 968 Posts
Default

look guys i drive a lot of new fast cars and i mean alot like merc-sl65,sl63, cls550,carrera2,aston db9,nissan gtr,bentleycoupe, all of these and I MEAN ALL OF THESE are fine but costly very costly part of the reason i dont have any and the the buy in is what keeps most of us out of that game
but my cars 88M3,88turboS,86944 turbo are not like the newer cars they are all brutally fast but too refined
my cars have all the hissing and popping clancking that make me FEEL i have cars with ***** and i do a pretty good job of keeping up with those cars till triple digits
Old 07-08-2009, 09:06 PM
  #77  
los423
Track Day
 
los423's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Van,

To answer your question about working on a corvette, I used to have an auto tech teacher who had random chevy engines lying around. He let us take apart and rebuild them and he has a couple of the LS engines lying around too. Theyre really easy to tear down and put back together.. Most of the bolts are just 9/16ths so you barely have to switch sockets. I'm not sure how different the Z06 engines are but I'd assume it's not too far from that.
Old 07-09-2009, 12:21 AM
  #78  
CPR
Race Director
 
CPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Yorktown, Virginia
Posts: 11,218
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Sorry guys, But I need to simplify this discussion into something I can relate to a bit more closely to...WOMEN

All cars serve a purpose, much like all women. Some look great in the beginning but begin to fade and age with time. Some will last forever with little maintenance, some however are very high maintenance. Some are ones that you want because your friends want one. Some are ones that you want because of its looks or performance or personality. Some you have a brief relationship with. Some you stay with forever. Some you want to spend all your time with. Some you can't wait to get rid of. Some you take out to show off and some you only take out for a 2.00am ride to the Quickie Mart (no pun intended).

What I am getting at is you either love these cars or you do not. Some will own them for a few months or maybe a year or so, while others will always have one. The first group typically owns it for the wrong reasons...something along the lines of being able to say "I own a Porsche", then upon realizing the commitment it takes to properly care for and maintain these classics often ditch them in favor of something newer and less maintenance dependent. But that is fine, as these cars were not meant for such people. A 951 is meant to be driven, meant to be raced, meant to be rode hard...meant to be RESPECTED. But along with that premise comes the responsibility to maintain and keep these cars alive, which must be a passion, and a love. Not some fleeting fancy of claiming ownership to look cool.

Are there cars that are faster? ABSOLUTELY
Are there cars that are more comfortable? SURE
Are there cars that are more driver friendly? YOU BET

But none of them, no matter how much spin you put on it will ever carry the same class and character as a PORSCHE 951. Just my .02....


BTW...and as far as a GT3 whipping a '51? Well if I can't beat ya' then I'll damn sure wreck ya
Old 07-09-2009, 12:40 AM
  #79  
JohnKoaWood
Nordschleife Master
 
JohnKoaWood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fly Away
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CPR
Sorry guys, But I need to simplify this discussion into something I can relate to a bit more closely to...WOMEN

All cars serve a purpose, much like all women. Some look great in the beginning but begin to fade and age with time. Some will last forever with little maintenance, some however are very high maintenance. Some are ones that you want because your friends want one. Some are ones that you want because of its looks or performance or personality. Some you have a brief relationship with. Some you stay with forever. Some you want to spend all your time with. Some you can't wait to get rid of. Some you take out to show off and some you only take out for a 2.00am ride to the Quickie Mart (no pun intended).

What I am getting at is you either love these cars or you do not. Some will own them for a few months or maybe a year or so, while others will always have one. The first group typically owns it for the wrong reasons...something along the lines of being able to say "I own a Porsche", then upon realizing the commitment it takes to properly care for and maintain these classics often ditch them in favor of something newer and less maintenance dependent. But that is fine, as these cars were not meant for such people. A 951 is meant to be driven, meant to be raced, meant to be rode hard...meant to be RESPECTED. But along with that premise comes the responsibility to maintain and keep these cars alive, which must be a passion, and a love. Not some fleeting fancy of claiming ownership to look cool.

Are there cars that are faster? ABSOLUTELY
Are there cars that are more comfortable? SURE
Are there cars that are more driver friendly? YOU BET

But none of them, no matter how much spin you put on it will ever carry the same class and character as a PORSCHE 951. Just my .02....


BTW...and as far as a GT3 whipping a '51? Well if I can't beat ya' then I'll damn sure wreck ya
LOL..HE SAID QUICKIE...LOL


well said sir..
Old 07-09-2009, 01:22 AM
  #80  
CarbonRevo
Drifting
 
CarbonRevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very well said indeed.

What I like a lot is the horsepower:boost ratio from a 951. I've seen Evo's that take more then 30lbs of boost to make 500whp or more. George's car made 530whp at 23lbs? Got to love that part of these cars. To us 951 guys, 16-17 is normal, 18-20 is getting crazy, 21 or more is just insane. It takes a hell of a lot more boost on other turbo cars to make the same power.

A good example of this...there's a black Evo that runs around KC. 576whp at around 40lbs of boost. I can only imagine what that dyno graph looks like if that turbo is fully spooled by even 5k rpm or more.
Old 07-09-2009, 01:34 AM
  #81  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

er ....... with capacity differnce like that it's not a fiar conparison at all ...all 2.5's should be be compared to 2.5 wrx's or even 2.5 and 2.6 skylines ..
and as for the 3.0 crowd set your dyno charts down next to some supras or even 300zx's or even turbo M3's honda NSX''s I think you'l find the 951 engine is only special 4 cylender terms and not that special lb for lb or cube for cube ...
Old 07-09-2009, 08:54 AM
  #82  
Van
Rennlist Member
 
Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hyde Park, NY
Posts: 12,008
Received 92 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonRevo
To us 951 guys, 16-17 is normal, 18-20 is getting crazy, 21 or more is just insane.
There must be some pudgy ladies out there... mine, she's only 11 pounds - and I thought that was normal.
Old 07-09-2009, 09:02 AM
  #83  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

cube for cube and pound for pound a 951 needs to make 25% more power then at the same boost to match the evo in specific power ... 288hp per liter times 2.5 is 720hp sorry I've seen a 944 2.5 make 720 hp at even 50 psi ... or a 3.0 944t make 864hp...
Old 07-09-2009, 12:43 PM
  #84  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,548
Received 648 Likes on 502 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gt37vgt
cube for cube and pound for pound a 951 needs to make 25% more power then at the same boost to match the evo in specific power ... 288hp per liter times 2.5 is 720hp sorry I've seen a 944 2.5 make 720 hp at even 50 psi ... or a 3.0 944t make 864hp...
thats a whole buncha power. imo that much power on this platform would be entirely useless, and regardless of cost i think that might be why no one has tried..

sure an evo can make 570HP from 2.0L but it will lag out the *** and also has 4wd and lsd's and tc and stuff to manage all of it...
Old 07-09-2009, 01:33 PM
  #85  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Screw peaky high rpm dyno queens...the are obnoxious to drive.

Now compare the torque at 4k rpm of a well built 951 to the other dyno queens numbers.
One of the huge differences of the 951 is that it makes huge mid range torque – and that’s what gets you out of the corners fast! The 951 is not rev happy motor – that’s not its design target.

So go get a dyno chart of the ‘other’ cars and look at the torque curve…..
Old 07-09-2009, 01:44 PM
  #86  
JohnKoaWood
Nordschleife Master
 
JohnKoaWood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fly Away
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

6, the answer is 6
Old 07-10-2009, 01:42 AM
  #87  
CarbonRevo
Drifting
 
CarbonRevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Chris- Exactly my point. Most cars don't make power until way late, or don't have 3-400lb/ft of torque from 2500 on. Just thing like that.

And let's stop to take note. The evo is 2.0L...but also roughly 15 years AFTER the 951. Now what is your debate? I'm just comparing 4 bangers to 4 bangers. I sure as hell would hope a RB26DET could make more power then your average 951 motor. Does have two additional cylinders...as does the supra and M3. That 4 cylinder to 6 cylinder comparison is more apples to oranges then 2.5L 4 versus 2.0L 4.

I'd love to compare Georges graph and a similar power evo graph. Regardless of motor size, they make the same power. I'd love to see who has more area under their curve.

All my Honda buddies tell me about these 400whp turbo hatches running around, but they also forget to mention they make peak torque at around 6k RPM or so. Maybe even more. And peak power is closer to 7-8K rpm.

Torque will win races for you. I've witnessed my own car do it. Nothing like seeing how much harder my car pulls and all the torque it put down then having someone jump me by a car and then when my car hit 3-4k rpm it was game over.
Old 07-10-2009, 03:56 AM
  #88  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,920
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

While I agree in sentiment, I've also seen first hand some very quick 16v Honda Civics at the track doing some really good times. Again a fairly tight track, and I can't swear that these guys didn't run a huffer under the hood, but I don't think so. I always thought our mid range punch was the strong suit of the 951 motor. Be good to see some dyno graphs of some of the bigger motors in here.
Old 07-10-2009, 04:01 AM
  #89  
los423
Track Day
 
los423's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've gone head up with a mk3 supra with a big turbo on it and he couldn't keep up until he hit 4 or 5k rpm's. After that it was dead even. I've also raced my friend's e36 m3 from a red light and he was beat so bad he went and bought a m5.
Old 07-10-2009, 02:13 PM
  #90  
CarbonRevo
Drifting
 
CarbonRevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There can be some pretty mean N/A civics no doubt. I've seen one hand a 350whp evo it's *** on a silver platter. It was a pretty serious car and had a lot more then motor work done. I have ridden in my buddies H22 EG Hatch and it handled like it was on rails no doubt, but it had quite a bit done to the suspension, where as our cars can do it stock. Then again, entry price into these cars is vastly different. FWD hondas can handle, but not my cup of tea. I love the front engine/rear trans layout. It must work if Chevrolet still uses it, even on the ZR1!


Quick Reply: The 951 question...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:20 PM.