Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

The REAL 27/8 thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2008, 12:34 AM
  #31  
Matt Sheppard
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Matt Sheppard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kalifornyuh
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I know Techno Duck was talking about selling a K27/6 for a good price. Ask him if interested.
Old 08-22-2008, 12:43 AM
  #32  
Techno Duck
Nordschleife Master
 
Techno Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Matt, thanks for the plug

Ive been all over the place about selling it, then keeping it. As it stands right now i am planning on keeping it.. just trying to figure out about converting it to the 7200 compressor wheel.

I chose the K27/6 for a few reasons. I am not concerned about peak numbers or a dyno queen. My goal was to put out a reliable 300whp at about 15-16psi. I think i can come pretty close to that with the K27, my K26/6 put down 260whp at 14psi..so i figure ill be pretty close with the K27. Spool up is a big concern of mine also and the K27/6 will offer those HP goals without even changing the spool up much. Ideally i would go for something like a Vitesse Stage 2 or something ball bearing from Pauerman, but the K27 is hard to beat considering the turbo itself can be had for the sub $500 range. I dont think the #6 hotside will really be a big factor for me with excess backpressure because i honestly dont plan on running much more than 16psi for maybe one or two dyno pulls. For all other times, the car will be set to 15psi. If anything ill actually be running less than 14psi while on the track because this car is a handful as is for me. Mind you, i came from driving a 125whp n/a 944 before this!

I think the real cost factor about upgrading comes when you start thinking about what supporting mods you need. That includes injectors, 3.0bar FPR and needing a new tune, achievable from either new chips with the AFM or going with a MAF system. I ended up going with the Vitesse MAF because it seems like the only system out right now where i dont read about problems and i love the ability to go from super low boost (i have a .8 bar wastegate spring) to 20psi if i wanted to without having to retune the car. Also the ability to swap turbo's without having to worry about the tune. Dont get me wrong, you pay alot upfront. My friends though i was nuts to pay that much for a MAF system (they are lucky to all have newer cars which come with MAF's standard!) but it was a true plug and play setup and continues to be even as you upgrade other parts of the car.
Old 08-22-2008, 02:19 AM
  #33  
jf951
Instructor
 
jf951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: sonoma
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i took tony g's advice a while back regarding 89s upgrade to 27/6...WOW!!! pulls like a MF. thanks tony.
Old 08-22-2008, 02:59 AM
  #34  
pete95zhn
Former Vendor
 
pete95zhn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: fortistuning.fi
Posts: 2,279
Received 108 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

While this thread turned to 27/6, I'll post my old dyno sheet too...:



Guru MAP & AFMLink, original airbox and IC, 3" exhaust including dp & cat, 1.1bar boost, 12-13 A/FR, #72 injectors.
Oh yes, there's also turbo's specs... K27/3LEP compressor housing, turbine wheel modified Holset 52x76mm, machined turbine housing, K27 62,5mm turbine wheel modified to 60x66mm, A/R 6.
Old 08-22-2008, 10:32 AM
  #35  
A.Wayne
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
 
A.Wayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RPM Central
Posts: 20,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pete95zhn
While this thread turned to 27/6, I'll post my old dyno sheet too...:



Guru MAP & AFMLink, original airbox and IC, 3" exhaust including dp & cat, 1.1bar boost, 12-13 A/FR, #72 injectors.
Oh yes, there's also turbo's specs... K27/3LEP compressor housing, turbine wheel modified Holset 52x76mm, machined turbine housing, K27 62,5mm turbine wheel modified to 60x66mm, A/R 6.
348 bhp/380 ft/tq from a K27/6 Good numbers. The rapid fall in TQ is due to exhaust restriction.
Old 08-22-2008, 11:57 AM
  #36  
pete95zhn
Former Vendor
 
pete95zhn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: fortistuning.fi
Posts: 2,279
Received 108 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A.Wayne
348 bhp/380 ft/tq from a K27/6 Good numbers. The rapid fall in TQ is due to exhaust restriction.
It's flywheel-hp, but I assume that you noticed. Anyway, it was all-day (I had boost controller set to 1.1bar ) usable power, more torque than stock peak between 3200 and 6400.
Old 08-22-2008, 03:08 PM
  #37  
lee101315
Three Wheelin'
 
lee101315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Weehawken NJ
Posts: 1,583
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Has anyone tried to port the hotside of a #6 or#8 turbo?
Old 08-22-2008, 04:02 PM
  #38  
mwc951
Rennlist Member
 
mwc951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Native Appalachia
Posts: 1,259
Received 45 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

This was my PH K27/6 7200(as stated on the invoice). When I ordered it, David commented that they no longer
were offering the DR wheel. This was with 55lb injectors, 3 bar FPR, 1st Gen. Vitesse software & MAF,
LR Stage II intercooler & hardpipes, 3" exhaust-no cat. I'd like to get it back to the dyno as I've added
LR Stage II head & VR chipboard. This run was back when Sunoco 94 octane was available and at 18psi.
The car pulls very well and I'm pleased with the K27/6.
Attached Images  

Last edited by mwc951; 08-22-2008 at 10:03 PM.
Old 08-22-2008, 08:09 PM
  #39  
400hp944
Burning Brakes
 
400hp944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mwc951
This was my PH K27/6 7200(as stated on the invoice). When I ordered it, David commented that they no longer
were offering the DR wheel. This was with 55lb injectors, 3 bar FPR, old Vitesse software & MAF,
LR Stage II intercooler & hardpipes, 3" exhaust-no cat. I'd like to get it back to the dyno as I've added
LR Stage II head & VR chipboard. This run was with 94 octane at 18psi.
The car pulls very well and I'm pleased with the K27/6.

mwc951-

Did David @ Powerhaus call your turbo a K27/29? Just curious, that's what he called mine. Not sure of the details other than he said he modified it to use a K29 wheel. Hmmm
Old 08-22-2008, 08:20 PM
  #40  
CPR
Race Director
 
CPR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Yorktown, Virginia
Posts: 11,218
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A.Wayne
348 bhp/380 ft/tq from a K27/6 Good numbers. The rapid fall in TQ is due to exhaust restriction.
A. Wayne,
Is it safe to say that this (TQ drop-off) could be negated with a well exhausted motor? e.g....3" catless exhaust? Would that also improve HP significantly?Moderately? or not at all? Thanks for ALL your input...this thread and others.

Cheers
Patrick
Old 08-22-2008, 08:47 PM
  #41  
400hp944
Burning Brakes
 
400hp944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Here is the link to my dyno run if anyone is interested. This was the re-run I referred to earlier in the thread - after making adjustments to the AFR. Enjoy!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MU-Sse3PUPM
Old 08-22-2008, 09:23 PM
  #42  
Spidey944
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Spidey944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I was excited about the 350hp dyno sheet above, until I realized it was at the crank. It's a great turbo I don't doubt it, but the #8 will just suit my needs better. Are 55#'ers enough for inj or would bigger be better?? I know 55's can handle 350hp or so and that is prob, the main goal.

Those with the K27/6. I am sure the quick spool is great, and the dyno charts are proof. Thanks for posting them!! I was actualy considering it for almost a whole day!!
Old 08-22-2008, 09:53 PM
  #43  
mwc951
Rennlist Member
 
mwc951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Native Appalachia
Posts: 1,259
Received 45 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 400hp944
mwc951-

Did David @ Powerhaus call your turbo a K27/29? Just curious, that's what he called mine. Not sure of the details other than he said he modified it to use a K29 wheel. Hmmm
The brief conversation I had with David I do not recall the nomenclature K27/29 coming up.
The invoice from PH states:
K27/6-7200 w/ light weight rotor group. Dated 2/04
Old 08-23-2008, 04:33 PM
  #44  
Keithr726
Nordschleife Master
 
Keithr726's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 5,107
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For the last 6 months I've been really liking the 27/6. Gotta have that early spool up. From what I've seen you can find new ones for slightly less than aftermarket turbos but where for only $500?
Old 08-23-2008, 05:35 PM
  #45  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pete95zhn
It's flywheel-hp, but I assume that you noticed. Anyway, it was all-day (I had boost controller set to 1.1bar ) usable power, more torque than stock peak between 3200 and 6400.
How would we notice it's flywheel and not wheel power? I must have missed something...



TonyG


Quick Reply: The REAL 27/8 thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:42 PM.