Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Neon SRT spool up/turbos vs. Vitesse (20psi+)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2007, 10:36 AM
  #1  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Neon SRT spool up/turbos vs. Vitesse (20psi+)

Can some Vitesse guys post about when you get full boost on high boost runs/dyno? I am just curious for comparison as Vitesse is at the forefront for turbos/spool up.

I see some Neon SRT guys getting 20+ psi by 3,300-3,600 but still have plenty of top end; turbo is not running out of steam AND spools pretty good.

I know Porschiphile will post, or should, as he knows a lot about more of the import markets.

http://www.orlandoforums.com/forum/s...=59878&page=11
Old 04-11-2007, 10:57 AM
  #2  
schadenfreude
Instructor
 
schadenfreude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a VR stage 3 and get 1 bar at about 3200-3400 by the tacho in 4th (hard to tell exactly since the boost is rising so fast at this point).

However, I seem to have weak ignition as my car stumbles and chokes if I go WOT at 2000 rpm in 4th. Also I'm pretty sure I have cracked headers or some other exhaust leak as my spool has always been pretty lame. With a tial 38mm wastegate shut all the way via EBC spooling a 26/6, I'd only get 1 bar at ~3000 rpm in 4th which seems to be worse than what a lot of others get with the same config.
Old 04-11-2007, 11:46 AM
  #3  
TRP951
Rennlist Member
 
TRP951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They also do have their turbo right on the manifold so that helps quite a bit
Old 04-11-2007, 11:53 AM
  #4  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So their turbo is right off the exhaust manifold?
Old 04-11-2007, 12:01 PM
  #5  
TRP951
Rennlist Member
 
TRP951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah like a eclipse/talon/evo ect. but the manifold is at the back of the motor and the intake is on the front
Old 04-11-2007, 12:17 PM
  #6  
Fishey
Nordschleife Master
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Stock SRT-4's the turbo is part of the manifold.. (IE doesn't unbolt)

Also, We have made mid 400whp out of our SRT-4 and it gets full boost by 3500RPM. (24psi)
Old 04-11-2007, 04:04 PM
  #7  
Porschefile
Three Wheelin'
 
Porschefile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's right I'll post! To achieve ~20psi between ~3.3-3.6k rpm, most of them are probably not using any exhaust housing larger than a Garrett T3 .63 a/r. A twin scroll .78a/r would work though. This is assuming a Gt3071r, equivalent or larger turbo. Actually honestly most of the dynos I've ever seen for Srt4's among other small displacement forced induction cars generally tend to show power/tq dropping off up top most of the time with a .63a/r or smaller exhaust housing. Srt4's are no exception. They might hold power a bit better, but almost all of the dynos I've ever seen with exhaust housings that small usually show power/tq dropping off before 6k rpm. If they maintain or still make any power on the top-end where ours wouldn't, it's likely a result of the more efficient heads.
Old 04-11-2007, 04:52 PM
  #8  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Bud!

Yea, it seems they are running smaller a/r in the .50 or so range.

But yet they are still running up to 25 psi???
Old 04-11-2007, 05:03 PM
  #9  
RKD in OKC
Rennlist Member
 
RKD in OKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a tizzy
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Guy at work as an SRT. He is planning putting a 77 turbo on it. Shop is telling him to put two turbos in line to get quick spool and big power.
Old 04-11-2007, 05:09 PM
  #10  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RKD in OKC
Guy at work as an SRT. He is planning putting a 77 turbo on it. Shop is telling him to put two turbos in line to get quick spool and big power.
Many say that is not the way to go, but I think it is. A lot of the big power Supra guys go from twin to single and they say it is better, but I don't know.

Example:

Like for us, a k26/6 inline with a k29/8 or 10. Then you have a ful tq curve from about 2,500-redline.
Old 04-11-2007, 08:11 PM
  #11  
Porschefile
Three Wheelin'
 
Porschefile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toddk911
Many say that is not the way to go, but I think it is. A lot of the big power Supra guys go from twin to single and they say it is better, but I don't know.

Example:

Like for us, a k26/6 inline with a k29/8 or 10. Then you have a ful tq curve from about 2,500-redline.
Twins are generally more "progressive" as boost comes on. Lots of people go single in that community because it is easier, less stuff in the engine bay, and once you get those big turbos spinning a bit (say like 7-10psi) the boost response goes nearly vertical. That's a large part of the reason you'll see those insane dynos where they gain like 700+whp within a 1-1.5k rpm range. In short, big singles generally tend to "hit" a lot harder, which is more fun to me. Technically twins are going to be a bit more responsive and offer a slightly wider powerband, but there are so many exceptions that it's not always true. Twin turbo setups are a waste of time on a 4 cylinder IMO. All you'd achieve is increased weight, complexity, and maybe a minimal increase in performance if that. If spool was your concern, you'd be better off at that point experimenting with various other things like implementing a twin scroll to meet your goals.

A large majority of the Srt4 stuff I've seen, and from browsing various forums seems to usually be 50 trim t3/t4's, Gt3076r's or Gt35r's, and many of those seem to be using .63a/r hotsides. Big power stuff (like 500+whp) is usually a .82a/r. Actually, many of them have surprisingly similar looking dyno curves to 951's.

Todd, what was the question about boost pressure? Yeah, some of those guys run a good amount of boost. With more efficient motors, standalones, etc I've seen people run up to 25psi on pump gas, but that's the absolute highest I've ever seen on pump. Were you mainly asking because of the small hotsides? Running that much boost with a small hotside is somewhat of an attempt at futility. Something like a .63a/r with a 50trim or bigger turbo and running that much boost, the hotside is going to pose a big airflow restriction as it's physically too small for that kind of airflow volume. Because of that, even running lots of boost, the horsepower gains won't be too substantial however the motor will still make tons of torque. You can even see evidence of that with 951's. There are several people around here who have run say ~19-23psi on K26's, and they barely make any more horsepower than at ~18psi however they make insane torque (Nize's 951 comes to mind).
Old 04-11-2007, 11:34 PM
  #12  
David Floyd
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
David Floyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,109
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Here is a run, straight from the chip/board no tuning. 18 psi

Old 04-12-2007, 01:24 AM
  #13  
shaheed
Three Wheelin'
 
shaheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: GA
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so you made it to the dyno again david? looking good, that thing must be running thru tires
Old 04-12-2007, 07:10 PM
  #14  
gcb951
Burning Brakes
 
gcb951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would think having better spool up then hugh top end power would be alot more fun, especially on the street.
Old 04-12-2007, 08:28 PM
  #15  
hosrom_951
UAE Rennlist Ambassador
Rennlist Member
 
hosrom_951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UAE & Germany
Posts: 9,142
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Those turbos' are also dual ball bearing.


Quick Reply: Neon SRT spool up/turbos vs. Vitesse (20psi+)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:25 AM.