Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

944 Turbo Vs. Cayman S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2006, 12:08 AM
  #1  
jturbo
Racer
Thread Starter
 
jturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wellsville, Pennsylvania
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 944 Turbo Vs. Cayman S

Has anyone test drove a Cayman S? How do you think the new Cayman S compares to the 944 turbo?
Old 04-11-2006, 12:30 AM
  #2  
Mike Buck
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Mike Buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Churchville, MD
Posts: 2,131
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Haven't driven one either, but I expect it would be better in almost every regard. 20 years more advanced.

944 has the edge in cargo room and oil leaks though =)
The following users liked this post:
RKT951 (10-19-2023)
Old 04-11-2006, 12:39 AM
  #3  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

I drove a BoxsterS with a 3.8L 997S engine (I installed the VarioCam control on it and tuned it). It was a blast to drive, lots of fun. Much easier to drive than the 951, but amodified 951 will hurt it.
The KaymanS handling is light years ahead of the 951. However, a bit of modifications and the 951 will destroy it as well.

Both Boxster and Kayman are easier to drive!

Would I trade my 951 for a Boxster or a Kayman? NO. I'll just get a Boxster and install a 3.8L in it and have fun.. (forced induction comes to mind though ).
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 04-11-2006, 12:46 AM
  #4  
RT930turbo
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
RT930turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: OH
Posts: 468
Received 30 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I drove a Cayman S last week. The car is just too much fun. So tight and responsive. The power is good, its sounds great, and the torque curve is impressive. Still doesn't touch a modded 951 in a straight line, but I think it would out-handle a stock 944 any day. Great cars, if you get an opportunity GO DRIVE ONE!!! it's worth it
Old 04-11-2006, 02:32 PM
  #5  
sweanders
Race Director
 
sweanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I don't really see the point of buying a Cayman since the 911 is so refined. I agree with Jeremy Clarkson who said that the Cayman is good but not as good as it could have been.
Old 04-11-2006, 02:50 PM
  #6  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"I agree with Jeremy Clarkson who said that the Cayman is good but not as good as it could have been."

I think we are all driving the 1980's equivilant of the Cayman; a car that could have been FAR better if the factory did not have to protect the 911 so much.

The Cayman was specificaly designed and built to fit in the middle of the Boxster and 997, both in price and performance.
Old 04-11-2006, 06:15 PM
  #7  
SD Porsche Fan
Cast Iron Man
Rennlist Member
 
SD Porsche Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 8,694
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by toddk911
I think we are all driving the 1980's equivilant of the Cayman; a car that could have been FAR better if the factory did not have to protect the 911 so much.
Does anyone else beside me think that this is a major R&D problem for Porsche? Has inherent rear engine design difficulties prevented them from making even more incredible designs?
Old 04-11-2006, 06:19 PM
  #8  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,152
Received 87 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

That sounds wicked. Any more info on that? I have always thought that platform would be great for about 400hp. 996 engines are bout 17k. Boxter (18k) plus the 17k for an engine, maybe 5k for a SC.



Originally Posted by fast951
I drove a BoxsterS with a 3.8L 997S engine (I installed the VarioCam control on it and tuned it). It was a blast to drive, lots of fun. Much easier to drive than the 951, but amodified 951 will hurt it.
The KaymanS handling is light years ahead of the 951. However, a bit of modifications and the 951 will destroy it as well.

Both Boxster and Kayman are easier to drive!

Would I trade my 951 for a Boxster or a Kayman? NO. I'll just get a Boxster and install a 3.8L in it and have fun.. (forced induction comes to mind though ).
Old 04-11-2006, 06:21 PM
  #9  
RKD in OKC
Rennlist Member
 
RKD in OKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a tizzy
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

RUF Cayman, oh yeah!
Old 04-11-2006, 06:27 PM
  #10  
streckfu's
Rennlist Member
 
streckfu's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 77,321
Received 668 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SD Porsche Fan
Does anyone else beside me think that this is a major R&D problem for Porsche? Has inherent rear engine design difficulties prevented them from making even more incredible designs?

It's a part of marketing an image and not too far off the joke about 40 years of engineering to compensate for the engine in the wrong place. The 911 IS Porsche. Everything else is secondary.

It's not a R&D problem but a market based choice.
Old 04-11-2006, 11:14 PM
  #11  
SD Porsche Fan
Cast Iron Man
Rennlist Member
 
SD Porsche Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 8,694
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Air cooled was Porsche also. Limits in the design forced change. The ultimate Porsche is not a 911 but a mid-engined, water cooled V10.

I understand the marketing decision to keep the marque a rear engine design. But if that design limits progress and "lesser" models with more potential are de-tuned to prop up the marque then something is wrong.
Old 04-11-2006, 11:19 PM
  #12  
streckfu's
Rennlist Member
 
streckfu's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 77,321
Received 668 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

I agree completely.

As I joked in a previous thread; Eventually, even VW fixed the Beetle.
Old 04-11-2006, 11:31 PM
  #13  
jturbo
Racer
Thread Starter
 
jturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wellsville, Pennsylvania
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How would the Cayman S compare to my 951 with current suspension set-up?
Old 04-11-2006, 11:46 PM
  #14  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,445
Received 94 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jturbo
How would the Cayman S compare to my 951 with current suspension set-up?
He will still run circles around you.
Old 04-11-2006, 11:53 PM
  #15  
ninefiveone
Rennlist Member
 
ninefiveone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 1,573
Received 54 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

At the limit, jturbo's ride will push pretty badly compared to a stock cayman S and have more body roll as well.

I have the same setup minus the stiffer front springs and find that you have to soften the fronts a good amount to get closer to neutral cornering. I run 245/40/17's all around as well so between the skinnier fronts and stiffer springs, I can only imagine how much more understeer there is.


Quick Reply: 944 Turbo Vs. Cayman S



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:03 PM.